• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech

2 questions (Fuel & Air Filter)

  • Thread starter Thread starter 05BlackV6
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2005

05BlackV6

New Member
Aug 25, 2005
25
0
0
Earth
Oct 20, 2005
#1
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #1
Question 1:

I was just curious what grade fuel you fill your car with. Someone suggested filling with super for better performance. Anyone here agree and think it's worth it? ( The Stang ISN'T my daily driver. )

Question 2:

That same person suggested getting a K&N air filter to increase performance and so you can just clean it and not replace it. Anyone use these filters? Worth it? (Hell they must be. Vipers use them alot!!!!)

Thanks all
 

fazm83

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
747
0
0
phoenix, arizona
Oct 20, 2005
#2
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #2
I have a K&N and yes its worth it, because its only like 3 times more than regular filter, and u dont have to replace/clean it as often.

Fuel, they did a test on a GT a while ago, filling it with 91 without tuning it for it, gained like 2.4hp and no real gas mileage increase. So its not really worth it unless you get a tuner and do it. I have the tuner with 91 octane and its night and day.
 

66mustangg

New Member
Oct 20, 2005
59
0
0
Westchester, NY
Oct 20, 2005
#3
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #3
The high octane will only give you a performance increase when your in the high RPM range. In the low RPM range it does the same as regual. So unless your racing it, with the gas prices now... i wouldnt put the high octane in.
 
S

shooterm1

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
540
1
0
Milford, Pennsylvania USA
Oct 20, 2005
#4
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #4
66mustangg said:
The high octane will only give you a performance increase when your in the high RPM range. In the low RPM range it does the same as regular. So unless your racing it, with the gas prices now... i wouldnt put the high octane in.
Click to expand...

Ford recommends 87 Octane. That's good enough for me.

unless I have it re-tuned of course ,,,
 

05BlackV6

New Member
Aug 25, 2005
25
0
0
Earth
Oct 20, 2005
#5
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #5
Is 87 Octane regular?
 

fazm83

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
747
0
0
phoenix, arizona
Oct 20, 2005
#6
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #6
87 is regular in most places. some places 89 is regular, and some places 85/86 is regular. The regular, supreme, etc mean notin, just read the octane.
 
D

davew

New Member
Jun 15, 2005
4
0
0
Oct 21, 2005
#7
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #7
If you filled with 91 or 93 octane without tuning for it, you might even end up with late combustion (in the compression cycle). I'd reccommend against it, but I'm not a mechanic
 

Fourth Horseman

New Member
Dec 1, 2004
92
0
0
Oct 21, 2005
#8
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #8
^^^ What they said. Unless your car's tune is set up with more timing you don't need higher octane gasoline. At best you're just wasting money and at worst you're getting late detonation (as mentioned above). Higher octane fuel is not more powerful. That's a common misconception.

If you're hearing pinging or knocking when running on 87 then I'd recommend going to the mid-grade gasoline. Otherwise, just pump what the manual recommends.
 

05BlackV6

New Member
Aug 25, 2005
25
0
0
Earth
Oct 22, 2005
#9
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #9
Thanks all.

I'll stick to regular and I'll pick up the K&N air filter.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Oct 22, 2005
#10
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #10
fazm83 said:
I have a K&N and yes its worth it, because its only like 3 times more than regular filter, and u dont have to replace/clean it as often.
Click to expand...
the motorcraft air filter from ford lists around $50, so a K&N is actually cheaper......
 

Philstang

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
203
0
0
Oct 24, 2005
#11
  • Oct 24, 2005
  • #11
Fourth Horseman said:
^^^ What they said. Unless your car's tune is set up with more timing you don't need higher octane gasoline. At best you're just wasting money and at worst you're getting late detonation (as mentioned above). Higher octane fuel is not more powerful. That's a common misconception.

If you're hearing pinging or knocking when running on 87 then I'd recommend going to the mid-grade gasoline. Otherwise, just pump what the manual recommends.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
402
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
881
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
721
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
864
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?