• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

2003 4.6 Rear end gears

  • Thread starter Thread starter yelladawg351
  • Start date Start date Jul 12, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
Y

yelladawg351

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
22
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#1
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #1
My friend advise me not to change my 03 GT(3.27) rear end gears cause the motor responds to the stock setup. He said it would hinder performance and cause my ride to be sluggish. Is this correct. Please expain.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jul 12, 2009
#2
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #2
I'm guessing this friend has a somewhat quick car and doesn't want you to be faster.
The car will feel much quicker and will probably be easier to launch out of the hole with steeper gears. The downside is higher rpms on the highway and normally slightly worse gas mileage. The only time gears would not be benifitial to you, is if you plan to run a power adder on street tires. Then, it is too easy to overwhelm the traction of the street tires.
 
R

ran260gt

New Member
Sep 7, 2005
365
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#3
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #3
Your friend is sooo wrong ! especially if you have an automatic !
 
Y

yelladawg351

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
22
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#4
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #4
No. I have a 5 speed. But he said Ford really did the research and put the correct gears in the GT. He told me it would be a waste of money.
 
Y

yelladawg351

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
22
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#5
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #5
The car is stock. I had a Fox body that responded to the gear change perfect. Also a 1995 GT. I'm new to the 4.6 mod motor and want to spend money wisely.
 
Y

yelladawg351

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
22
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#6
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #6
I'm not a newby to this. Just wanted more than two opinions. This car might see a cam upgrade. Possibly a supercharger if the bank robbery goes well.
 
R

ran260gt

New Member
Sep 7, 2005
365
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#7
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #7
yelladawg351 said:
No. I have a 5 speed. But he said Ford really did the research and put the correct gears in the GT. He told me it would be a waste of money.
Click to expand...


Just like when ford did the research to put the correct gears in the fox mustangs 2.79 , 3.03 , Ford only picked 3.27 gears for a even split in Gas Mileage and Performane !
 
F

FordTaurusSHO94

Member
Apr 14, 2003
110
0
16
Jul 12, 2009
#8
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #8
My 03 was easier to launch and a lot faster once I changed to 4.30's. With the stock gears, you have to balance it between bogging or spinning. With 4.30's, launch soft and stab it and it just goes. It was rare that anyone got the jump on me.
 
Y

yelladawg351

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
22
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#9
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #9
I was really thinkin about 3.55 caus it seems to be the perfect gear. Gas mileage and performnce. What u think? I had 3.90 on my my 95 393 ci. set up and it was pefect but just a lil steep. It was a 5 speed also,
 
Y

yelladawg351

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
22
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#10
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #10
Thanks for da replies. 3.55 seems to be the best upgrade.
 

V_Eight

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
617
1
0
ATL
Jul 12, 2009
#11
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #11
3.55 is pathetic. I've had 4.10s with a blower and a t56 and I would've gone higher. This isn't an econo car, no need to be weak with it.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jul 12, 2009
#12
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #12
I would consider 3.73s to be mild for a 4.6. When you say 3.55, I'm thinking why bother.
 
Y

yelladawg351

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
22
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#13
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #13
The only reason I post this is becaus my 95 with the 393ci. set up was tuned into a track monster with the 3.90 gears. I'm tryin to pick a balance. Those Chevrolet guys are tearin us up on the street cause we can not get the right combos. I know from expeirience. My main goals is a cam upgrade cause it is cheaper than supercharger and will kiss me every day I turn it on. Love those Cam Exhaust sounds.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jul 12, 2009
#14
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #14
bhuff30 said:
I would consider 3.73s to be mild for a 4.6. When you say 3.55, I'm thinking why bother.
Click to expand...

I'd agree. I've got 3.73s in my 02 and find them perfect for my combo and driving style. Top gear highway revs are still quite low but it's much livelier around town. I can see why guys would go as high as, say, 4.10s though I personally wouldn't. To each his own.

But 3.55s are just too close to stock, being just 8.6% shorter (versus the 14% shorter that 3.73s are) that it makes me say "why bother?"

The mod motor doesn't mind the additional revs (in fact, it relishes them) and at just 281 cubes it really does need more torque multiplication than it got from Ford.
 

eliteJAE

Member
May 29, 2007
0
1
16
Stanford University
Jul 12, 2009
#15
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #15
The thing is, the 393 probably had alot of low end, our mod motors do not. Our engines scream up top, which is why gears are do beneficial and improve SOTP the most. 3.90 on a 393 might have been too much, but even 4.10 on our modular 281's can be insufficient. You say you want to be wise about buying parts, and if you go with 3.55's you won't feel much of a difference and you'll wish you'd gone with steeper gears.

Just look around here, most n/a setups are running steeper than 3.55, I usually only see those gears on blower/turbo setups that have alot of lowend and do not benefit from a steeper gear (like your 393).
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Jul 12, 2009
#16
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #16
Not enough difference between 3.27's and 3.55's to make any difference. Unless your getting them for free, I would ditch that idea. 3.73's, 3.90's, or 4.10's would be your best bet. From the way your talking it sounds to me like you should go with 3.73's.
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Jul 12, 2009
#17
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #17
LOL your friend has no idea what he's talking about.

The 4.6 mod motors make the majority of their power in the higher RPM's (unlike the torque monster 5.0's). So the faster you can get up into the upper RPM range, the quicker your will feel/be. Gears (especially 4.10's) accomplish this quite well.
 
Y

yelladawg351

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
22
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#18
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #18
Damn. Excuse my English. I respect all u guys opinion and prolly go with 3.90 only because it seems to be right in the middle. Only problem is Ford Racin does not make it but Motive gears does. But Motive is a great choice cause I had them in my 95. Love that combination. Thanks again for your input. Money will be well spent wisely .
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Jul 12, 2009
#19
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #19
yelladawg351 said:
No. I have a 5 speed. But he said Ford really did the research and put the correct gears in the GT. He told me it would be a waste of money.
Click to expand...

Than explain to me why ford is now offering the GT with 3.73 track pack, and I could be wrong but the 2010 GT500 comes with 3.55 or 3.73 stock...ford got wise to what performance enthusiasts wanted and actually listened for once.
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Jul 12, 2009
#20
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #20
ran260gt said:
Just like when ford did the research to put the correct gears in the fox mustangs 2.79 , 3.03 !
Click to expand...

2.73, 3.08. I think 3.73's or even 3.90's would be good. I've got 3.55's stock and if I ever do a gear change I'm gonna go with 3.90's. Very few people do, but I think it's a nice middle of the road gear.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
408
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
538
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Tuesday at 2:38 PM
joeybuddy96
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
848
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
252
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
255
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?