• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

2005 GT ET's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shane3232
  • Start date Start date Jan 15, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

shane3232

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
6
0
0
Jan 15, 2004
#1
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #1
Hey, does anyone have any guesses to what kind of et's or 0-60mph times we should be seeing from these things? I read in Motor Trend that it should do 0-60 in 5.2 and the 1/4 mi. in 13.9. If the current GT's are running 14 sec 1/4's i would think that we should see better times than this . What does everyone think?
 

Zinc001

New Member
Oct 27, 2001
410
0
0
Jan 15, 2004
#2
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #2
shane3232 said:
Hey, does anyone have any guesses to what kind of et's or 0-60mph times we should be seeing from these things? I read in Motor Trend that it should do 0-60 in 5.2 and the 1/4 mi. in 13.9. If the current GT's are running 14 sec 1/4's i would think that we should see better times than this . What does everyone think?
Click to expand...
I agree. With the improved weight balance it should be quicker off the line. With a good driver I think we'll see about 13.7 times.
Doug
 
S

shane3232

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
6
0
0
Jan 15, 2004
#3
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #3
Yeah, i believe the current gts have a 57/43% distribtion compared to the 2005's 52/48. I think the autos should be considerably faster too because of the lower gears in the new 5 speed trans. Maybe they will even aproach 14 flat compared to something like 14.4 for the current ones? Does anyone have any real #'s for the 03's, i cant seem to find where it was i saw their times.
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Jan 15, 2004
#4
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #4
13.7? when stock 99-04GTs are running 13.9's or better? I say professionally driven 13.4 or so. Were talking about atleast 30 more rwhp and torque to back it up.

kirkyg
 
O

Omegalock

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
616
0
0
Jan 15, 2004
#5
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #5
30? More like 40
I'm betting mid 13s on average with a great driver dropping it to low low 13s.
And if a magazine is GUESSING 13.9 I think those numbers might be accurate.
 
S

shane3232

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
6
0
0
Jan 15, 2004
#6
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #6
I am about as big of a mustang supporter as there is, and as much as i want to believe that the 99-04 gts run a 13.9 or better 1/4 mile, i just dont think its true, not for a bone stock gt anyway. I have heard rumors of this, but ive never seen any proof of it. But if u have some real #'s i'd love to see them being i have 01 gt vert. Also the Mach's with the same gear ratios and nearly the same hp/tq as the 05's only run 13.4 stock and i have a feeling that their hp/tp curve is much more level than the 05's will be so i dont think that the 05's can match that.
 
S

shane3232

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
6
0
0
Jan 15, 2004
#7
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #7
Omegalock said:
30? More like 40
I'm betting mid 13s on average with a great driver dropping it to low low 13s.
And if a magazine is GUESSING 13.9 I think those numbers might be accurate.
Click to expand...
Omega, what kirkyg said was "Were talking about atleast 30 more rwhp and torque to back it up." the 05 will have 40 more hp and 15 more ft/lbs at the crank, which if u figure in a reasonable 15% loss through the drivetrain, gives u 34 more rwhp and 12.75 more ft/lbs at the wheels.
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Jan 15, 2004
#8
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #8
shane3232 said:
I am about as big of a mustang supporter as there is, and as much as i want to believe that the 99-04 gts run a 13.9 or better 1/4 mile, i just dont think its true, not for a bone stock gt anyway. I have heard rumors of this, but ive never seen any proof of it. But if u have some real #'s i'd love to see them being i have 01 gt vert. Also the Mach's with the same gear ratios and nearly the same hp/tq as the 05's only run 13.4 stock and i have a feeling that their hp/tp curve is much more level than the 05's will be so i dont think that the 05's can match that.
Click to expand...

13.9 has been acheived with fairly good consistancy. I ran a 14 flat first time ever to be at the track. I did not push my car quite to its limits. My 60 ft. was 2.16 which can be improved upon as well as humidity was 95% and temperatures were not very cool. 13.9 with perfect driving could have DEFINITELY been acheived by my car bone stock.

Another thing to note is in most of fords vehicles now a days the higher hp vehicles atleast are being slightly underrated. I would not be surprised if the new stang will put out more like 315-320 flywheel hp.

kirkyg
 

yellow5.0cobra

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2002
2,849
0
0
In the garage, On the floor.
Jan 16, 2004
#9
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #9
I have WITNESSED a 2002 GT, 5spd, with nothing but a K&N drop in filter run a 13.8...

I also ran my old 2002 GT, AUTOMATIC with an OFFROAD H pipe + KN and hit 14.1@100mph.
 
S

shane3232

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
6
0
0
Jan 16, 2004
#10
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #10
yellow5.0cobra said:
I have WITNESSED a 2002 GT, 5spd, with nothing but a K&N drop in filter run a 13.8...

I also ran my old 2002 GT, AUTOMATIC with an OFFROAD H pipe + KN and hit 14.1@100mph.
Click to expand...
Wow, thats an awesome time for just droppin in a K&N. Maybe its just one of those FF's or somethin?
 

holler

Founding Member
Dec 5, 2000
332
0
0
Chicago
Jan 16, 2004
#11
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #11
there are multitudes of stock 99-04 GTs that have gotten sub 14 sec times. it is not unusual at all. I am sure someone will eventually post a time slip. there is a huge difference between 13.4 and 13.9 time btw. a 1/2 second is a long time and it just grows exponentially the further down you go...
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
Jan 16, 2004
#12
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #12
shane3232 said:
Wow, thats an awesome time for just droppin in a K&N. Maybe its just one of those FF's or somethin?
Click to expand...

No. Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords took a bone-stock 2003 GT, and ran a 13.7.
 
J

joey8656

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
273
0
0
NJ
Jan 18, 2004
#13
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #13
i4power said:
No. Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords took a bone-stock 2003 GT, and ran a 13.7.
Click to expand...


NO, read the article. That car was not bone stock.
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Jan 18, 2004
#14
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #14
Its easy to say it wasn't...since you know so much about it what modifications were done to the mustang?

kirkyg
 

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Jan 18, 2004
#15
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #15
I watched a 2002 GT Auto go 13.66, then 13.67! Stock as a rock except for Magnaflow mufflers (welded in). The next weekend he went 13.77 at a different track. Since then I have not seen him go better than 14.0xx.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Jan 18, 2004
#16
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #16
The best test that I have seen of a BONE STOCK Mustang GT was in 5.0 Mag.

They took a good driver and ran multiple passes with a truely BONE STOCK 2002 GT Coupe. The times they got were:

14.986 @ 94.47
14.557 @ 97.09
14.684 @ 96.42
14.450 @ 97.82
14.218 @ 98.06

Then they started modding the car: They disconnected the front sway bar, removed the spare tire & jack, removed the air intake filter housing (& silencer), pumped the front tires up to 46 PSI and iced the intake manifold:

13.960 @ 99.02
13.721 @ 101.8

So you are not going to see 13's on a bone stock 99 - 04 unless you have a big tail wind.
 
J

joey8656

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
273
0
0
NJ
Jan 18, 2004
#17
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #17
I'll go get the article tomorrow. From what I remember the sway bar was taken out, the intake was iced down for over an hour before the 13.7 run and the front tires had around 40psi in them ad afew other things were done.
Like I said, I'll post the exact info later....but I don't recall an ice bag option or sway bar delete option on any 03 at my local dealership.

P.S.- Obviously it all comes down to what you mean when you say "bone stock". I think saying an 03 GT goes 13.7 "bone stock" is just misleading becasue even MM&FF couldn't pull it outta the show room and do it, they had to prep the car. Of course some people may disagree with me.
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Jan 18, 2004
#18
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #18
351CJ said:
The best test that I have seen of a BONE STOCK Mustang GT was in 5.0 Mag.

They took a good driver and ran multiple passes with a truely BONE STOCK 2002 GT Coupe. The times they got were:

14.986 @ 94.47
14.557 @ 97.09
14.684 @ 96.42
14.450 @ 97.82
14.218 @ 98.06

Then they started modding the car: They disconnected the front sway bar, removed the spare tire & jack, removed the air intake filter housing (& silencer), pumped the front tires up to 46 PSI and iced the intake manifold:

13.960 @ 99.02
13.721 @ 101.8

So you are not going to see 13's on a bone stock 99 - 04 unless you have a big tail wind.
Click to expand...

I ran a 14.0 @ 99.5 with 0 track experience first time out with my bone stock car. You can say whatever you want but my car was easily capable of a 13.95 or 13.9 + the weather was humid and not very cool.

kirkyg
 
J

joey8656

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
273
0
0
NJ
Jan 19, 2004
#19
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #19
The car in MM&FF ran over 101 mph in addition to running 13,7x. That mph shows what the weight reduction, super cold/ iced down intake and less rolling resistance (from 40 psi in the front tires), and evan smith's driving all come into play.
 
Z

Z28x

New Member
Sep 19, 2003
644
0
0
Albany NY
Jan 19, 2004
#20
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #20
Since we won't agree on a 1/4mi. time, how about we guess "how much" faster it will be.

I bet the '05 will be .2-.3 sec. quicker in the 1/4mi than the '99-'04
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Will I feel a difference
  • 90Stanger302
  • Mar 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
214
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
Noobz347
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
815
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
F
2004 Mustang GT – Fuel Pump Not Priming
  • Fayio
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
178
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2026
n0v8or
N
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
147
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
L
1997 V6 Starting issue
  • leanzik04
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
205
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Mar 20, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?