JimF65 said:What do you mean "swapped the body work"? The Probe was a Mazda, just with a few sheet metal differences. Yes, not a bad car, but definitely not a worthy successor to the Mustang name. True, we don't have the authorative documentation from Ford, but it's pretty clear, and many mags speculated the above with nary a denial from Ford when it was happening.
As for the Cougar: poor styling, too close a copy of Asian cars, not a worthy successor to that name, in my humble opinion. You don't get ahead by imitating.
Yup, they do listen to consumers..... sometimes. :o)
30AnnivStang said:somebody should photochop a new cougar based off of the new mustang. i'd do it, but i ain't that good. I can tint windows and lower cars, but not change the grilles and tailights.
I looked, that is one goodlookin' car. Interesting that they put the little "kickup" on the rear fenders that the original Mustang had but the new one doesn't.30AnnivStang said:
63_Fairlane said:The Probe always looked like a nock off of the RX7 with its pop-up headlights and whatnot.
The Cougar was definately not the right car/design for Mercury.
Back on topic, Mercury needs a "grown up" version of the Mustang... maybe with suicide doors so folks can get into the back seat, more trunk space, etc. A GTO fighter if you will. That would make the Mustang doubly damaging to Chevy by sharing platforms and covering a wider market segment.
mustang50v8 said:i was having the same sort of thought. nissan did it with the 350z and the infiniti G35 coupe, they have the "sports car" and the luxury "performence car for the more grown up" and both cars seem to do very well in 2 seprate segments of buyers
fly2low said:Actually, Ford does offer that kind of upscale coupe; they call it Jaguar XK series
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?