• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

2005 Press kit...

  • Thread starter Thread starter tylers65
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

ryanrule

impotent
Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,355
0
0
Madison, WI
Dec 15, 2003
#21
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #21
steve94 said:
i dont get it, are u supporting or dissing V6's?
It took twin turbos to get into the 11s, how impressive

and i thought fords plan was to eventually have the 3.0 in the stangs, but that it juts wasnt ready yet?

Either way, i hope the 4.0 is not an indication of weight, but ive heard they will be slightly heavier.
Click to expand...
he did it for 4600 with stock engine and an auto, i think its is pretty good, how much to get a gt into the 11's?
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Dec 16, 2003
#22
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #22
TrueBlueCajun said:
Well the '04 Ranger's 4.0l specs are this:

Base Number of Cylinders: 6
Base Engine Size: 4 liters
Base Engine Type: V6
Horsepower: 207 hp
Max Horsepower: 5250 rpm
Torque: 238 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 3000 rpm

Remember, the '03 F-150 had the 4.6l like the GT, but had these numbers....

Base Number of Cylinders: 8
Base Engine Size: 4.6 liters
Base Engine Type: V8
Horsepower: 231 hp
Max Horsepower: 4750 rpm
Torque: 293 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 3500 rpm

So, the 4.0l '05 Mustang may actually have around 225+ hp in it. It seems they can get more out of the engine in a car.
Click to expand...

No. Notice how the 4.6L had less HP, but more torque. They just used a different cam in the 4.6L for the F-150, as they should have. The cam itself is made to produce more low end torque because you want more torque in a truck then HP, as torque decides how much you can carry and towe. So the 4.0L in the 05 may have less torque, but more HP. I also think that it will carry the torque high into the RPM band then the Rangers 4.0L

-Shaun
 

JadeFalcon

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2002
1,924
0
0
Arlington, TX
Dec 16, 2003
#23
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #23
It's a 3 valve 4.6L in the GT, it will make about 280-300hp.
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Dec 16, 2003
#24
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #24
Thanks for posting that Tyler. Interesting about the 4.0 V6. What kind of reputation does this engine have for durability, tweakability, etc.?

For someone like myself considering picking up a 05 used, the V6 (which is considerably cheaper to begin with, depreciates faster than the GTs, is much more plentiful in terms of cars to choose from, and is less likely to have been abused by previous owners) is a good option. Also, if the new 4.6 3v turns out to be problematic, a proven 4.0 V6 would be even more appealing.
 
D

davis181

New Member
Nov 28, 2003
28
0
0
Dec 16, 2003
#25
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #25
i hope it at least will have 325 for the gt model and 270 for the v6 model.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Dec 16, 2003
#26
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #26
Good luck on the 270hp V6. I don't think Ford has the balls for that yet.
 
B

Boomer v3.8

New Member
Mar 13, 2003
127
0
0
Dec 17, 2003
#27
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #27
The 4.0 can push it, but you won't ever see it come from the factory like that.

What IS nice to know is the fact that its a got some great potential.
 
D

davis181

New Member
Nov 28, 2003
28
0
0
Dec 17, 2003
#28
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #28
or 240 hp v6 model and gt model 325 hp
 
S

Spectre382

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2002
54
0
7
Villanova Univ. or York, PA
Dec 17, 2003
#29
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #29
I for one am sort of excited about the possibility of the Ranger's 4.0L going into the Mustang. It means there's likely going to be a trickle-down of performance parts for us Ranger and Explorer owners. I've got an Explorer with the 4.0 SOHC in it, and I've been saying for ages that it would make an excellent car motor. It works okay in Rangers and Explorers, but they're just too heavy for it. It really needs the manual trans like in the Ranger to get up and go, as the five-speed auto in my Exploder is too sluggish in downshifting for my tastes. Even with 4.10 gears, the low end punch is sort of weak, but over 3K RPMs, it hauls.

Thus far, there has been a dearth of aftermarket parts development, because it's just not that high profile of an engine. Some people have been working on superchargers, but boost isn't easy to come by due to the high compression ratio. I remember a while back one guy custom fabbed a Roots-style supercharger and intake manifold setup for his Ranger, but he had to use water injection to get more than just a couple pounds of boost without detonation. I don't think I'd ever seriously consider buying a V6 Stang, but my Explorer might need a new engine in a couple years......
 

Stang2Man

Founding Member
May 16, 2000
363
0
17
In the Hood of Newbern Beyotch
Dec 20, 2003
#30
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #30
Doesn't Powerdyne make a bolt on kit for the Ranger/Explorer 4.0? And in turn wouldn't that come pretty close to bolting right on to a Mustang
 
S

Spectre382

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2002
54
0
7
Villanova Univ. or York, PA
Dec 21, 2003
#31
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #31
Stang2Man said:
Doesn't Powerdyne make a bolt on kit for the Ranger/Explorer 4.0? And in turn wouldn't that come pretty close to bolting right on to a Mustang
Click to expand...

There are two different 4.0L engines that were offered over the years in Rangers and Explorers. The old one was the OHV, which has some aftermarket support. That's the one you're thinking of. The newer one is an SOHC engine, with no support.
 
M

Mr. Jack

New Member
May 23, 2003
68
0
0
Dec 22, 2003
#32
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #32
davis181 said:
i hope it at least will have 325 for the gt model and 270 for the v6 model.
Click to expand...



That would be great...2005 Mustang V6 owners spanking pre-2005 GT owners...
 
P

PhantomGT

Founding Member
May 4, 2002
469
0
0
Austin Texas!
Dec 22, 2003
#33
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #33
I stand corrected.. Nice work buddy
 

tylers65

I've got your tool right here!
Jan 7, 2001
3,278
0
57
Tacoma, WA
Dec 22, 2003
#34
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #34
PhantomGT said:
Where did you get this Information?
Click to expand...

Is this directed at me?

My info comes form various reliable sources. Ask anyone here on this forum, I have yet to give bad info.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
5r55s auto to TR3650 Manual swap 4.0 V6
  • Ceskz
  • Feb 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Mar 27, 2025
89ripper
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
719
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
C
Fabio from Italy!
  • Ceskz
  • Feb 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
222
The Welcome Wagon Feb 24, 2025
Ceskz
C
D
supercharging my v6 4.0
  • dreamerv6stang
  • Jan 12, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Jul 21, 2025
tovlux6
T
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?