• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

2009 Camaro leaked image

  • Thread starter Thread starter StangCollecter
  • Start date Start date Jan 7, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

Szlachcic

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
168
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Jan 18, 2006
#61
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #61
Berserker said:
The only reason the Camaro didn't hold the same kind of appeal as the mustang is because as usual GM burplpuked on itself in 1970 and destroyed a really great car. The first gen is the only real camaro and the only camaro to ever have serious appeal equal to the mustang. I agree the mustang is the best package for the money and the sweetest looking ride to come along in a very long time.
Click to expand...

I agree, 1st gen Camaros are f#$%ing hawt.
 

Blk05Retro

Member
Mar 31, 2005
99
0
6
Katy, TX
Jan 19, 2006
#62
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #62
When you see the 2008 Challenger, you instantly think modern 1970 model. I don't see that in the camaro. Are they trying to get styling ques from many years. The front end looks like a 69, but the rear looks like an early 1970's style. I don't think they knew what they wanted. I sort of like the front from the doors forward, but can't stand the rear. The rear is way to short and I don't like the fastback roof-line. Just my two cents!!!!
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jan 19, 2006
#63
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #63
Blk05Retro said:
When you see the 2008 Challenger, you instantly think modern 1970 model. I don't see that in the camaro. Are they trying to get styling ques from many years. The front end looks like a 69, but the rear looks like an early 1970's style. I don't think they knew what they wanted. I sort of like the front from the doors forward, but can't stand the rear. The rear is way to short and I don't like the fastback roof-line. Just my two cents!!!!
Click to expand...

It's kinda hard to tell. What kind of retro look they were going for. Perhaps if I saw it in front of a mobile home. I would have a better opinion.
 
S

shooterm1

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
540
1
0
Milford, Pennsylvania USA
Jan 19, 2006
#64
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #64
SVTdriver said:
It's kinda hard to tell. What kind of retro look they were going for. Perhaps if I saw it in front of a mobile home. I would have a better opinion
Click to expand...



Well one thing we can count on here is that GM will NEVER produce that car the way that's its shown here




Its a pure concept, and unlikely to see ever the light of day in this form

>>> just wait until the bean counters have their way with it
 
B

Berserker

New Member
May 27, 2005
7
0
0
Jan 19, 2006
#65
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #65
Blk05Retro said:
When you see the 2008 Challenger, you instantly think modern 1970 model. I don't see that in the camaro. Are they trying to get styling ques from many years. The front end looks like a 69, but the rear looks like an early 1970's style. I don't think they knew what they wanted. I sort of like the front from the doors forward, but can't stand the rear. The rear is way to short and I don't like the fastback roof-line. Just my two cents!!!!
Click to expand...
The front end does not look like a 69. The hole problem is that it doesn't take enough from the first gen. The back looks corvettish. The rear 3 quarter is perfect. The fenderwells are arched like the 67' and 68' which I like much better than the flattened top of the 69' camaro but the arch should be brought forward at the bottom to bring in that camaro look.
 
B

Berserker

New Member
May 27, 2005
7
0
0
Jan 19, 2006
#66
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #66
SVTdriver said:
It's kinda hard to tell. What kind of retro look they were going for. Perhaps if I saw it in front of a mobile home. I would have a better opinion.
Click to expand...
The last time a saw that was in the 80's and man I wish I could go back and grab them up.
 

tylers65

I've got your tool right here!
Jan 7, 2001
3,278
0
57
Tacoma, WA
Jan 19, 2006
#67
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #67
www.planetcamaro.com

 
S

shooterm1

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
540
1
0
Milford, Pennsylvania USA
Jan 19, 2006
#68
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #68
tylers65 said:
www.planetcamaro.com
Click to expand...

that's a familar looking profile!


- - ​
 

SinCityVogel

New Member
Aug 4, 2005
118
0
0
Las Vegas
Jan 20, 2006
#69
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #69
It looks like a brick with wheels... Its too bad they should be building this car.
 

Attachments

  • 2007CamaroNew2.webp
    17.3 KB · Views: 148
  • 110309phr-5camaro05_z-med.webp
    8.3 KB · Views: 145
B

Berserker

New Member
May 27, 2005
7
0
0
Jan 20, 2006
#70
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #70
shooterm1 said:
that's a familar looking profile!


- - ​
Click to expand...

Must I do everything for GM...

They had the right idea with the front end and then went the wrong way to fix the problem. Idiots.
 
S

shooterm1

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
540
1
0
Milford, Pennsylvania USA
Jan 20, 2006
#71
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #71
Berserker said:
Must I do everything for GM...
They had the right idea with the front end and then went the wrong way to fix the problem. Idiots.
Click to expand...

please! dont feed the GM dolts any ideas ~
 
B

Berserker

New Member
May 27, 2005
7
0
0
Jan 20, 2006
#72
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #72
shooterm1 said:
please! dont feed the GM dolts any ideas ~
Click to expand...
As if they would EVER do the right thing. I would love to see a camaro done right so I'm not going to not say anything. The mustang is secure for eternity period. No worries.
 

concreteman

New Member
May 7, 2005
21
0
1
Snohomish, Wa
Jan 20, 2006
#73
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #73
I like the rear third of the car, but the front two thirds just looks like a squashed redone cadillac, inside does nothing for me either, and yes I have owned GM cars before so I'm not just being a "homer", the challenger is awesome, if I was to buy another new retro car I would seriously look at it. Even though the 05 GT isn't pushing over 300 hp, the looks are what made me want it in the first place. Frankly I don't care what a car comes from the factory with as far as power because the aftermarket is offering so much better parts and addons.
 
S

shooterm1

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
540
1
0
Milford, Pennsylvania USA
Jan 21, 2006
#74
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #74
SVTdriver said:
It's kinda hard to tell. What kind of retro look they were going for. Perhaps if I saw it in front of a mobile home. I would have a better opinion.
Click to expand...

until then >>>> take a look at this < link
 
B

Berserker

New Member
May 27, 2005
7
0
0
Jan 22, 2006
#75
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #75
I Just watched coverage of the Detroit auto show. The Camaro was barley mentioned with doubt that it will be produced. But the Challenger was looked at more seriously with direct mention that they hoped it makes it to production. For a car that has been out of the picture for a few years and that has a large following, this Camaro concept should have garnered more attention. This car as is will not be built. It’s a loser unless they get serious about it. Can’t believe they actually started with the S197 to build a retro Camaro. GM sucks.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Jan 22, 2006
#76
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #76
shooterm1 said:
until then >>>> take a look at this < link
Click to expand...
from the link:

the camaro IS a burnout machine!!
Click to expand...
 
M

Mike06_10pm

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
98
0
0
Jan 22, 2006
#77
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #77
damm might have to do some research and find out where that girl in the white is from

daumm
-mike
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 22, 2006
#78
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #78
T4B said:
The front end looks a bit funny to me but otherwise I really like it.
Click to expand...
the front end reminds me of the 88 monty carlo ss. been there done that i think the new challenger looks better then this car. looks like it is going to cost a bunch of money too which was its downfall in the first place. they keep competeing with there own corvette. idiots
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 22, 2006
#79
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #79
bigcat said:
from the link:
Click to expand...
looks like it was time to get the posi rebuilt in that car.
 

Bloody Guts

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
23
0
0
Metro Detroit
Jan 22, 2006
#80
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #80
couldn't let this go on forever without getting my opinions out there

I've been looking at all the pictures of the challenger and camaro, I thought the challenger looked nicely done and the camaro was a little off the mark.

Today I went to the auto show.

I think you HAVE to see both of these cars in person to make a decision.

I was very unimpressed with the challenger - quite plain in concept form, a little clunky, and it'll look horrible with regular sized wheels.

The camaro on the other hand was hot. The front end doesn't protrude nearly as much in person, it's got really nice hips, the profile is damn near perfect, and the roofline is strong without directly copying the older car (like the challenger does)

you really need to see the camaro before you pass judgement.... but, that was the concept, I only hope that the production car, if there is one, retains the strength and sexiness that they were able to create with the concept

that's what i have to say

j
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
High idle issue and leaking after running.
  • PHoffman
  • Dec 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
469
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2024
General karthief
Engine Coolant leak from throttle body
  • 91GTstroked
  • Oct 9, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2024
91GTstroked
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
She's a runner
  • limp
  • Jul 26, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 26, 2023
limp
B
1992 Airbag Module
  • bicknell
  • Aug 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2024
jeremyzcook82
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?