• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

2010 Mustang Concept thoughts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caldwell
  • Start date Start date Nov 16, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Nov 16, 2006
#1
  • Nov 16, 2006
  • #1
Wow, i'm shocked to see me being the first to post this especially that the 2010 stang concept is on the main splash page.



and I understand that it's only a concept, possibly completely off base of what may happen.

I'm putting my $0.02 in right now

this thing looks wicked.
the tails are a bit 'unique'... i know i can't see the front, or the interior...
and again, it's only a concept done by someone other than ford.

but i'm gonna start hoping beyond a hope now...
that they stick with this, tweek it, and release this puppy as the new 2010.

if so...
my next car will be another stang
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Nov 16, 2006
#2
  • Nov 16, 2006
  • #2
Looks like an eclipse.
 

69clark

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
731
7
18
Ravena, NY
Nov 16, 2006
#3
  • Nov 16, 2006
  • #3
I think it might look okay. Need more pics but they may be in the right direction.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 16, 2006
#4
  • Nov 16, 2006
  • #4
Although looks are important to me, I just hope that they bring the weight back down to the low low 3000lb range and up the power and/or cubes.
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Nov 16, 2006
#5
  • Nov 16, 2006
  • #5
it does look like an eclipse...

i don' tknow... next Mustang i buy is probably either gonna be a terminator or a Cervini's s197 c500. these few concepts of the next body style haven't really tickled me.
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Nov 17, 2006
#6
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #6
that concept is badass period. i love the modern curves + classic shape. Those tails are awesome.

I too thought the new stangs were heavy, but the gt500 is pushing 800rwhp with a kb? As for straight line I dont see the point of making it lighter as long as there is enough power going through it.

you know what would be sick would be a 2 seater mustang roadster built on a lighter platform but then I guess it would be a corvette
 

94gts

Member
Jul 4, 2004
873
0
16
Carmel, New York
Nov 17, 2006
#7
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #7
the way the mustang game is right now, the only one made after 95 i would care to own would be an 03/04 cobra. the rest dont appeal to me at all.
 

donkey_punch

New Member
Jan 16, 2004
565
0
0
northern****ingjersey
Nov 17, 2006
#8
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #8
they pay someone to design this crap? thats awefull, i thought the camaro looked like stomped dog ****, i guess we have a new winner.
 
9

95Mustang302

Member
Mar 30, 2005
302
0
16
Nov 17, 2006
#9
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #9
that car is not the concept, its not even a picture from the us from what I understand from other sites.
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Nov 17, 2006
#10
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #10
95Mustang302 said:
that car is not the concept, its not even a picture from the us from what I understand from other sites.
Click to expand...

it's 'a' concept yes, but no, it's not guaranteed that 'this' concept will forward the new 2010 platform.

from what i've read, even to spin off from what paul was saying earlier... naturally, the new release is supposed to have more power than the s197 platform... do i think they'll ever bring back the 5.0? doubtful.

they should make something new...
there's a 'concept' that hasn't been done.

make a 6.0L
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 17, 2006
#11
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #11
Engel said:
I too thought the new stangs were heavy, but the gt500 is pushing 800rwhp with a kb? As for straight line I dont see the point of making it lighter as long as there is enough power going through it.
Click to expand...


Which would you rather have?

A 3900lb GT500 with 800hp can run approx. a 9.88 at 138 in the 1/4.

A 3000lb car with 800hp can run approx. a 9.05 at 150.

The lighter car will be less likely to break things as well.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 17, 2006
#12
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #12
Caldwell said:
it's 'a' concept yes, but no, it's not guaranteed that 'this' concept will forward the new 2010 platform.

from what i've read, even to spin off from what paul was saying earlier... naturally, the new release is supposed to have more power than the s197 platform... do i think they'll ever bring back the 5.0? doubtful.

they should make something new...
there's a 'concept' that hasn't been done.

make a 6.0L
Click to expand...


IMO Ford will almost HAVE to either:
1. Add some sort of forced induction if they intend to stick with the little 4.6L in the base GT model.
2. Up the cubes to a 5.4L at a minimum if they want to play NA.

I say this based on what GM and Dodge have planned for their soon to be released pony cars. I hope ford doesn't miss the boat this time around.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Nov 17, 2006
#13
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #13
I like it, but I don't like the tail lights at all. Is it possibly a hatchback/fastback??? If it is, I want one!
 

Kornnut

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,999
48
108
Tulsa
Nov 17, 2006
#14
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #14
Reason cars have gotten heavier over the past few years is because of the upped hp. That slows them down thus making them safer. Safer=cheaper to insure. If they stay at the 3000 pound mark it will be the 70's all over again and companies will charge outrageous premiums on these cars. I am not a fan of the added weight either. Its just a trade off I guess.
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Nov 17, 2006
#15
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #15
3 points...

1. I agree with cars being light... it has proven to be a good bonus and helps for performance, however... if the elise and new audi ktm roadster is any indication (an extreme one at that) but my point is... if the car tries to be TOO light, it will cost $$$

2. I completely agree with the engine size. I was being a bit facetious with my 6.0L comment, however you caught my point. the 4.6, as strong, and good as it has proven itself through time, is not THE staple of the pony car.

3. I don't like the tails either, but much like almost every concept car I've ever seen, the tail lights are always changed... odd.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Nov 17, 2006
#16
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #16
Ford has always underpowered there cars
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Nov 17, 2006
#17
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #17
Killercanary said:
Which would you rather have?

A 3900lb GT500 with 800hp can run approx. a 9.88 at 138 in the 1/4.

A 3000lb car with 800hp can run approx. a 9.05 at 150.

The lighter car will be less likely to break things as well.
Click to expand...


I would take the faster one but 9.88 is pretty damn fast too man
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 17, 2006
#18
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #18
Engel said:
I would take the faster one but 9.88 is pretty damn fast too man
Click to expand...


I'm with you on that one!
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Nov 17, 2006
#19
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #19
Extra weight has its good features too. I think that think looks like a 350z, but its not bad.
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Nov 17, 2006
#20
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #20
Engel said:
I too thought the new stangs were heavy, but the gt500 is pushing 800rwhp with a kb?
Click to expand...


Was that bull**** posted on here too??? Can you send me the link?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
250
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
640
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
G
1983 GLX Convertible 5.0 5-Speed 4BBL 'Barn Find' - 82,000 original miles - Restoration Motivation Needed
  • Grande Luxe X-Factor
  • Oct 7, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 31, 2024
Mac131
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
6K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?