• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

2011 GT runs 10's!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tim2002GT
  • Start date Start date May 20, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

SlammedGT

Active Member
Oct 15, 2004
581
9
29
Peotone, IL.
Jun 19, 2010
#41
  • Jun 19, 2010
  • #41
dont forget this one
YouTube - 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L 4V Runs 10.58@127MPH!
 
S

sweet tooth

New Member
Jan 31, 2007
154
0
0
Jun 19, 2010
#42
  • Jun 19, 2010
  • #42
somebody just cracked that time put it into the 9 s. i will find out from my bro and post it.
 
S

sweet tooth

New Member
Jan 31, 2007
154
0
0
Jun 19, 2010
#43
  • Jun 19, 2010
  • #43
sthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZopOJ4Bd88 strictly performance out of texas just went 9.96@137 in new 5.0 here is video.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Jun 19, 2010
#44
  • Jun 19, 2010
  • #44
Like posted a few posts above...
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jun 20, 2010
#45
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #45
the 9.96 car is making 656rwhp. the motor is far stronger thn anyone knew. nobody has blown it up yet. almost impossible to hurt stock. i run it off the limiter all the time. it just revvs too easy.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jun 20, 2010
#46
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #46
rabidscoobie said:
I just dont like the area around the tail lights or the tail lights,the rest of the car isnt bad.

Yea i know it would take deep pockets now,but just wonder if its actually possible what kind of parts and enginuity its gonna take,besides after theres been a few sold and wreaked the motors might not be as pricey...
Click to expand...

it really isnt going to take a lot of money over the car itself to run 9's.



basic bolt on suspensions parts, gears, 250port injected shot, tune, slicks, a transmission that can handle it. my advice is to get an automatic if you want to run like that. the 6 speed auto is supposed to handle more power than 656rwhp.

10's is a 150shot, suspension, tune, slicks, exhaust, filter.

11's is a 100 shot, suspension, and et streets.

low 12's tune, et streets.


highest tune only car is 415rwhp/390rwtq. that's a 2000 mile car with tune only. not one single bolt on. he is gonna add a steeds CAI. im going with the steeda unit also. the car was dyno'd and tuned at livernois, so the dyno's history is well known.


the numbers just keep climbing faster than anyone could imagine.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jun 20, 2010
#47
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #47
probably only 5 -7 rwhp from the filter. its the tune that yields so much.

he should be at 420-425rwhp after he adds the filter/maf. the steeda unit has a 95mm velocity stacked maf.


he hasnt even messed with the REAL restriction. the exhaust is smaller than 1999-2010 mustangs. its 2.25 inches.


its starting to look like the limit from bolt ons is going to be 450-460rwhp.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jun 20, 2010
#48
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #48
sadly this motor IS going to require the PCM also. the engine managment is too alien from all other modulars.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jun 20, 2010
#49
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #49
scupking said:
450rwhp 05-09 with supercharger for a total cost of 22k vs 370-380rwhp on the 2011 5.0 for 40k. The 2011 will be looking at the 05-09s tail lights. Yes with basic bolt ons and a 93 oct tune the 5.0 puts down around 405 N/A rwhp (very impressive) but the 05-09 will still be passing it for a lot less money. Don't get me wrong I love the 5.0 but for me it is just to much money. Also some days I like the looks of the new stangs some days I don't. I'm sure if I put a supercharger on my car right now I would be looking at 400+rwhp and the 5.0s will be also looking at my tail lights. I just felt like putting in that last sentence to make me fell better about my car lol.
Click to expand...

tune only 415rwhp. mine is only 33k financed.

hey man i know what you mean.


but the coyote is like a full race engine ford GREATLY detuned for the mustang GT. when the first cars surpass 450rwhp on bolt ons, its only a matter of time before cams and head porting gets into them. livernois has already said more than 400CFM in a ported coyote head.

the coyote will need a race valvetrain to reliably live with 8200 rpms, but thats just rocker/springs/retainers away.


we dont even have a BOSSR intake on one yet. they are tunnel port intake manifolds.


there's just no telling how much power these coyote's will see on the street in the next year.

i do feel like stock gt500's had better watch out.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
Jun 20, 2010
#50
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #50
Bill I thought JPC hit 10s with slicks, suspension, gears and a 100 shot. Evo has a lot more mods and only goes little bit faster which imho isn't very impressive on their end. But now that strickly perform is in the 9s evo will want to top that.
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Jun 20, 2010
#51
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #51
Damn, 10s from just throwing on a bottle and some tires.
 

KBExperience

Active Member
Jun 21, 2009
466
1
49
Houston
Jun 20, 2010
#52
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #52
I know it would be nearly impossible to get one of those in a new edge, and I'm not saying I want to do it.. But if you did, it would run like a scalded dog, considering how much lighter the 96-04s are
 

SlammedGT

Active Member
Oct 15, 2004
581
9
29
Peotone, IL.
Jun 20, 2010
#53
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #53
someone on here is swaping one into a fox... its on here somewhere
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,391
3,538
233
Jun 20, 2010
#54
  • Jun 20, 2010
  • #54
KBExperience said:
I know it would be nearly impossible to get one of those in a new edge, and I'm not saying I want to do it.. But if you did, it would run like a scalded dog, considering how much lighter the 96-04s are
Click to expand...
288lbs is really not a big deal considering how the chassis is 30x the chassis the 99-04 cars were. Also that extra weight is stuff you want. Big ass 4-pot brakes, panhard bar, better interior, more gears, steeper rear gear etc etc etc.
Put the larger brakes, stronger trans, panhard on the SN and the weight will be dang near the same yet the 2011 will still destroy the SN in all categories.
Its sad but true. I LOVE 03/04 Cobras..... LOVE THEM! I had 2 and they were everything to me but now, now way in hell I would choose one over a new GT.
 

KillaKev702

New Member
Mar 26, 2009
28
0
1
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 22, 2010
#55
  • Jun 22, 2010
  • #55
LaserSVT said:
Gonna see a lot of these new 5.0's wrecked by the end of Summer.
Click to expand...


 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
552
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
1999 Mustang GT - No Start- Need help understanding the fuel pump circuit and how it works
  • 99gtGuy
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
521
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2025
04newedge-
0
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
907
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
796
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
S
Hello from Minnesota (and the ancient MustangBoards)
  • SpeedofDarkness
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
216
The Welcome Wagon Aug 24, 2025
SpeedofDarkness
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?