• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

24 lb injectors with stock maf?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tbird187
  • Start date Start date Apr 24, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

tbird187

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
392
1
0
Indiana
Apr 24, 2009
#1
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #1
anyway to make this work and run alright??? what fuel pressure?
 
W

West Texas Z

Member
Apr 2, 2009
71
0
6
Thornton, Colorado
Apr 24, 2009
#2
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #2
I'm doing this change too and was curious if it would work or should we go to 94-95 Cobra MAF?
 
M

Mike in Texas

New Member
Nov 7, 2005
121
1
0
Apr 24, 2009
#3
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #3
Stock maf

Well I don't think the stock maf will work with the 24# ers. I went with a C&L 73mm when I changed Injectors and had to go with a PMAS when I put the supercharger on to get decent low rpm performance. Assuming that you had other mods that required the 24# inj, then you need to change out that undersized stock MAF anyhow.
 
Reactions: michaelgt

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,932
224
Massachusetts
Apr 24, 2009
#4
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #4
You need a tune or an aftermarket MAF calibrated for 24's.

Ford doesn't have MAF's set for 24's...the tune is in the EEC


Best way to do it is a tune. Look at a calibrated MAF as a temporary measure
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 24, 2009
#5
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #5
Mustang5L5 said:
You need a tune or an aftermarket MAF calibrated for 24's.

Ford doesn't have MAF's set for 24's...the tune is in the EEC


Best way to do it is a tune. Look at a calibrated MAF as a temporary measure
Click to expand...

Don't 93 Cobra's have 24lbs injectors?
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Apr 24, 2009
#6
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #6
GTOreturns said:
Don't 93 Cobra's have 24lbs injectors?
Click to expand...

The computer is tuned for the 24's, not the MAF.
 

89 LX 5.0

New Member
Apr 16, 2009
14
0
0
Apr 24, 2009
#7
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #7
i'm runnung 24lb, but they were in it when i got it. don't really know much about the MAF or the computer
 
W

West Texas Z

Member
Apr 2, 2009
71
0
6
Thornton, Colorado
Apr 24, 2009
#8
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #8
Mustang5L5 said:
You need a tune or an aftermarket MAF calibrated for 24's.

Ford doesn't have MAF's set for 24's...the tune is in the EEC


Best way to do it is a tune. Look at a calibrated MAF as a temporary measure
Click to expand...

Crap. So I can keep my 19's and get a bigger MAF and be good?
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 24, 2009
#9
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #9
bubba-dough said:
The computer is tuned for the 24's, not the MAF.
Click to expand...

Huh?
 
T

thebullschmidt

New Member
Dec 12, 2008
65
0
0
Apr 24, 2009
#10
  • Apr 24, 2009
  • #10
the 93 cobra is equiped with 24lb injectors but only a 19lb "stock" maf. however the computer is equipped with conversion tables that make the maf work with the injectors. so if one were to get their hands on a 93 cobra computer and some 24lb injectors they could still use a stock maf... may b easier to go C&L tho
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Apr 25, 2009
#11
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #11
GTOreturns said:
Huh?
Click to expand...

The EEC is what is Calibrated to the Injectors.
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Apr 25, 2009
#12
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #12
West Texas Z said:
Crap. So I can keep my 19's and get a bigger MAF and be good?
Click to expand...

Yes, but the maf has to be calibrated for the 19's
 
S

SetofAces

New Member
Jan 22, 2009
103
0
0
SF Bay Area
Apr 25, 2009
#13
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #13
West Texas Z said:
Crap. So I can keep my 19's and get a bigger MAF and be good?
Click to expand...

You should be good with the stock injectors anyways . . . unless you have enough other mods to make well over 300 hp . . .
 
W

West Texas Z

Member
Apr 2, 2009
71
0
6
Thornton, Colorado
Apr 25, 2009
#14
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #14
SetofAces said:
You should be good with the stock injectors anyways . . . unless you have enough other mods to make well over 300 hp . . .
Click to expand...

Not that I'm doubting you guys but why do they sell the MAF's to match the injectors?

Mustang 75MM Mass Air Meters for 24Lb Injectors at LRS - Same Day Shipping!
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 25, 2009
#15
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #15
The reason for all this confusion is that the aftermarket MAF manufacturers have totally FUBARED the meaning of 'Calibrated' (<--- Notice the intentional use of ' ', as what the aftermarket does isn't technically a Calibration... it's more of a Skewing of output. I will refer to aftermarket meters as 'Calibrated', and to Ford meters as Calibrated. Ford did it right, and the aftermarket does it the lazy way.)

A MAF meter measures intake air. Air flow is the input, and the voltage output is solely dependent on air flow.
ONLY an aftermarket meter is 'Calibrated' for use with a specific Injector size AND ecu combination.

For example -
A MAF meter 'Calibrated' for use with 30Lb Injectors on a 93 Cobra (X3Z ecu) is not the same as a MAF 'Calibrated' for use with 30L Injectors on a 90 GT (A9L ecu).

When using aftermarket meters, all three things need to be in harmony.


Ford did things a little different... Actually, you could call it the 'Right Way'
Ford Calibrated the stock ecu to read the output of the MAF meter used on that vehicle series. This is done with a setting called the MAF Transfer, which can be thought of as a way to translate MAF voltage output back into an air flow number (CFM or Kg/Hr).
There are 2 settings in the ecu for the Injector size, called the Injector High Slope and Injector Low Slope. Basically, this setting tells the ecu how much fuel will flow from the Injector for each millisecond the Injector is open.


The problem with the aftermarket MAF meters is that they skew the output for air flow, in order to trick the ecu into adding the right amount of fuel. This would be fine if ONLY the injector duration were changed based on MAF output.
However, the ecu uses LOAD to decide how much fuel and Ignition Advance to run, in addition to deciding what strategy to run. Load is calculated based on MAF meter output.
Introduce error into the MAF output, and you are introducing error into the LOAD calculations. Error in the LOAD calculations is carried over into the Fuel and Ignition Timing.


With the availability of the QuarterHorse from Moates and Binary Editor software, there isn't any reason why anyone should be running a 'Calibrated' MAF meter these days.
For roughly $300 you can be ready to tune & datalog nearly every parameter on your Fox Mustang. Changing injector sizes involves changing roughly 5 parameters in the ecu settings, and doesn't involve BUYING a new MAF meter.
Just my opinion though...


jason
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Apr 25, 2009
#16
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #16
The aftermarket MAFs modify either the MAF sensor or the airflow across the sensor. That tricks the computer into metering the
correct amount of fuel for the "measured" airflow. This isn't as good as the Ford method, but it is portable and will work
across a number of different engine combinations.

Ford used a much more sophisticated method in the 93 Cobra by writing the computer's fuel to airflow lookup tables to match
the fuel delivery of 24 lb injectors.
 
W

West Texas Z

Member
Apr 2, 2009
71
0
6
Thornton, Colorado
Apr 25, 2009
#17
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #17
jrichker said:
The aftermarket MAFs modify either the MAF sensor or the airflow across the sensor. That tricks the computer into metering the
correct amount of fuel for the "measured" airflow. This isn't as good as the Ford method, but it is portable and will work
across a number of different engine combinations.

Ford used a much more sophisticated method in the 93 Cobra by writing the computer's fuel to airflow lookup tables to match
the fuel delivery of 24 lb injectors.
Click to expand...

ok, so if I install the 24's in my car (reason is that I'm getting a GREAT deal on a set) which MAF and throttle body would be a good combo for me that would get the best HP? 70mm throttle body + 76mm mass air?

Sorry for all the questions. ????
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 25, 2009
#18
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #18
West Texas Z said:
ok, so if I install the 24's in my car (reason is that I'm getting a GREAT deal on a set) which MAF and throttle body would be a good combo for me that would get the best HP? 70mm throttle body + 76mm mass air?

Sorry for all the questions. ????
Click to expand...
Yes, or bigger...

the point of my long winded post was that 'calibrated' MAF meters are OLD technology, and not the best option available.
A 90mm LMAF will satisfy your current needs, and 'almost' any future upgrades.
They can be found for less than $100, shipped...
$250 for tuning hardware from Moates.
$110 for the Software to tune it from EECAnalyzer.

Roughly $460, and you will also be able to manipulate Fuel Tables, Timing Tables, Disable Emissions, Adjust Decel Fuel ShutOff, Account for Displacement Increases, Tune for best acceleration, etc......
But the coolest thing is... you would NEVER have to buy another 'calibrated' MAF meter again!!!

Long term the cost effectiveness of a tuner is worth it...
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Apr 26, 2009
#19
  • Apr 26, 2009
  • #19
vristang said:
Roughly $460, and you will also be able to manipulate Fuel Tables, Timing Tables, Disable Emissions, Adjust Decel Fuel ShutOff, Account for Displacement Increases, Tune for best acceleration, etc......
Click to expand...

Yup, I agree.

But, as I often say, I deal with reality. And, in reality, there are total idiots like the one that posted a "for trade/sale" in the tech forums today. Sigh! IMHO, that's reality. Also, in reality, people want simple ricer answers, they do not want to learn or think.

So, let people slam their cars 2+" and adjust their TPS. Yup, their car will out handle and out run my car.


That's also why, if/when I give a rat's *ss , I tell people that want to go to 24's to get a 93 Cobra EEC and 93 Cobra MAF, keep the stock air box, and be done with it! It works, it's correct, it's simple, and it's cheap.

Of course, people run their POS C&L with their ricer cone filters and love it! So, if they are happy, that's what really counts.
Well, off the soapbox #1.


Okay, on soapbox #2.
If anyone really gives a rat's *ss about how real-life EFI control systems work, then I strongly suggest the following articles:

IMHO, the following two articles are a must read for anybody that wants to talk about MAFs.
http://www.fordfuelinjection.com/files/How_MAF_works.doc

Ford Mustang | MustangWorks.com - EEC-IV Adaptive Control. Your best friend or your worst nightmare?

BTW: Mike Wesley was well known in the racing circles (late 80's) and created the first "tuner software/chip of the EEC by reverse engineering the code.


Also, check out,
Ford Fuel Injection Strategies

A Quick Overview of the Inner Workings of the EEC (Mustang Fuel Injection Computer), by TMoss:
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/EECIVInnerWorkings.pdf

Technical Reference for the EEC IV.
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/eec-IV-Tech98.zip

Well, off the soapbox #2.



As some people know, I've been designing, specifying, and doing the architecture for critical precise control/response systems for a over a dozen years. I have my MS in CS/EE/CE (with a minor in ME) and I used to teach Control Systems engineering and DSP classes.

So, I know how even some engineering students and many engineers have a hard time understanding control systems.


IMHO, in reality, the vast majority of people that read this thread, and go to bigger injectors, will throw on some POS setup. I hope they don't forget to adjust their TPS to 0.9999v. This year, I went the whole winter with only one tank of gas with my Stang (I never had to add any gas at all!).

Oh yea, did I mention that people like simple ricer answers and do not like to think. HONESTLY, I didn't have to add any gas to my Stang this winter! Do not think, it will hurt!
 
Reactions: PlayboyRacer
W

West Texas Z

Member
Apr 2, 2009
71
0
6
Thornton, Colorado
Apr 26, 2009
#20
  • Apr 26, 2009
  • #20
That's also why, if/when I give a rat's *ss , I tell people that want to go to 24's to get a 93 Cobra EEC and 93 Cobra MAF, keep the stock air box, and be done with it! It works, it's correct, it's simple, and it's cheap.
Click to expand...

I cant get a Cobra EEC becuase I have an automatic.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
192
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
Blown88GT
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
244
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
K
88 speed density misfire and bucking
  • kush
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
203
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2026
DadLife0724
K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
541
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
229
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?