• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

2nd Race with LS1 tonight

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazykid2056
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
C

crazykid2056

Banned
Apr 27, 2005
46
0
0
Jun 15, 2005
#1
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #1
Yesterdays, I just got the SLP loudmouth exhaust installed on my '05GT, but this is really the only mod (besides the free mods).

The first time I raced my friends '99 Trans Am (stock with just Flowmaster, 115,000 miles) he destroyed me . I was about a car length behind till about 70mph when his Trans Am started pulling hard.

How will my '05GT do tonight with the SLP Loudmouth against the same LS1?



______
2005 GT
SLP loudmouth exhaust
 

BrutalStang

New Member
Aug 2, 2004
261
0
0
PA
Jun 15, 2005
#2
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #2
i wouldnt think much better with just the exhaust, try launching at a higher RPM
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Jun 15, 2005
#3
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #3
The ole 3rd gear pull with the LS1s, many of Mustangs have kept up until 3rd gear. 350 cubes is difficult to overcome. I'd think u'd at least need a CAI and a tune with the catback also great driving to get the job done but good luck.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 15, 2005
#4
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #4
crazykid2056 said:
Yesterdays, I just got the SLP loudmouth exhaust installed on my '05GT, but this is really the only mod (besides the free mods).

The first time I raced my friends '99 Trans Am (stock with just Flowmaster, 115,000 miles) he destroyed me . I was about a car length behind till about 70mph when his Trans Am started pulling hard.

How will my '05GT do tonight with the SLP Loudmouth against the same LS1?



______
2005 GT
SLP loudmouth exhaust
Click to expand...
one car length doesn't sound like getting destroyed to me. I mean on the street how long is it taking to get to 70mph, 6.5-7 seconds maybe. How quickly did they pull on you, was it from the line then you held it even pace from then on upto 70, or was it gradual all the way upto 70. Or was it dead even until the other side of 60mph when they suddenly pulled hard on you.

This all will have a bearing on how easy it will be to stick with them in the future.
 
C

crazykid2056

Banned
Apr 27, 2005
46
0
0
Jun 15, 2005
#5
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #5
I was behind a car length till about 70mph. T

Then his LS1 pulled hard (I fell behind about three car lenghts between 70mph and 100mph) and I gave up.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 15, 2005
#6
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #6
crazykid2056 said:
I was behind a car length till about 70mph. T

Then his LS1 pulled hard (I fell behind about three car lenghts between 70mph and 100mph) and I gave up.
Click to expand...
in that case as they were not pulling ALL of time uptp 70mph then it should be easier to match them. As they must have got a jump on you somewhere along the line, probably from the launch which could be driver as much as it is car related.

A new exhaust is unlikely to make any real difference but if you can perhaphs get them a bit better of the line you may be able to stock with them to about 80mph, which is where you want to call it quits. Well atleast until you get more mods.

Good luck.
 

Doc GTO

Member
Oct 23, 2004
610
0
16
Ocala, FL
Jun 15, 2005
#7
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #7
The exhaust will give you a few ponies but I say that a CAI and a good tune is what you will need to hang. If you want to put some distance on him then LTs, X/H pipe, gears and you should be good. That's of course he doesn't do any more mods himself!
 
C

crazykid2056

Banned
Apr 27, 2005
46
0
0
Jun 15, 2005
#8
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #8
After 70mph, he really took off. I think it might take all of those mod's to hang with the LS1 at those higher speeds.

I didn't realize how much faster the Trans Am's were compared to us in third gear.
 
R

ruffy

Member
Apr 10, 2003
314
0
16
Skopje, Macedonia
Jun 15, 2005
#9
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #9
The best thing you can do is get a CAI and a good tune. The stock tune and air box is too conservertive <sp>
 
K

kystang1889

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
199
0
0
ky
Jun 16, 2005
#10
  • Jun 16, 2005
  • #10
his is car stock or what? ws6 regular t/a? ram air just curious
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 17, 2005
#11
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #11
kystang1889 said:
his is car stock or what? ws6 regular t/a? ram air just curious
Click to expand...
Maybe this will help:
crazykid2056 said:
The first time I raced my friends '99 Trans Am (stock with just Flowmaster, 115,000 miles)
Click to expand...

WS6 or Ram Air will have no real bearing on its potentail as the engines produce the same BHP, as long as you don't beleive the GM quoted figures.
 
W

Wsmatau

Member
Nov 30, 2004
93
0
6
Jun 17, 2005
#12
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #12
300bhp/ton said:
WS6 or Ram Air will have no real bearing on its potentail as the engines produce the same BHP, as long as you don't beleive the GM quoted figures.
Click to expand...

In theory, but in reality a SS Camaro will beat a WS-6 firebird every time and they have identical engines.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 17, 2005
#13
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #13
Wsmatau said:
In theory, but in reality a SS Camaro will beat a WS-6 firebird every time and they have identical engines.
Click to expand...
well I own neither, but I am a member of a few fbody boards.

Post that there and it'd probably crash the server. The only real difference between the Z and the TA is the aero package, but it is unlikely to have any real affect the low side 120mph, and from what I've read not a great deal at higher speeds either.

RAM air is a pretty pointless mod and always has been (although still rather cool, but that won't alter the physics behind it).
 
C

crazykid2056

Banned
Apr 27, 2005
46
0
0
Jun 17, 2005
#14
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #14
Ram-Air is excellent for inducting colder air quicker into the throttle body.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 17, 2005
#15
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #15
crazykid2056 said:
Ram-Air is excellent for inducting colder air quicker into the throttle body.
Click to expand...
no its not and has been covered lots of times. FI in the form of a turbo or supercharger is the only way to force more air into the engine of a road car.
 
2

2MFF-Z28

New Member
May 1, 2005
30
0
0
Jun 17, 2005
#16
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #16
The ram air on the SS or WS6, although functional, does nothing except look cool.
 

ragu1585

Member
Jul 22, 2004
152
0
16
Spring, TX
Jun 18, 2005
#17
  • Jun 18, 2005
  • #17
ram air aka another form of "CAI" which we all know how that is. the 2 cars are identical in every single way that i can remember, except looks, rated hp, and $$$ with the ss and ram air having a "performance (cai) & handeling package". All Similar times between the ss, ws6, t/a and z28! it is def a drivers race to see who will win!
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF&gt;...
Jun 18, 2005
#18
  • Jun 18, 2005
  • #18
Ram Air is only a concept to most of us. Dont believe it will ever show any performance gains with any of your cars in your life unless you plan to reach "felony related speeds" or want to be like "Johny".

-Dan
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 18, 2005
#19
  • Jun 18, 2005
  • #19
Wsmatau said:
In theory, but in reality a SS Camaro will beat a WS-6 firebird every time and they have identical engines.
Click to expand...
I asked this on a fbody site (so as to be completly unbiased), click here to see what they thought of that statement
 
J

JMAN311

New Member
Jun 17, 2005
6
0
0
Jun 18, 2005
#20
  • Jun 18, 2005
  • #20
Wsmatau said:
In theory, but in reality a SS Camaro will beat a WS-6 firebird every time and they have identical engines.
Click to expand...

Although they are the same identical engine if anything I believe that in my experience the WS6 were always just a bit faster than the SS's. Even in the C&D and R&T magazines from the 99-00 model years the mustang cobra vs. ss vs. ws6 tests the trans ams were always a little bit faster 0-60 and 1/4 mile than the SS. (i'm sure i still have the magazines in my basement if anyone wants me to check the numbers)

Also the 00 SS that I owned I raced a 99 WS6 that only had a Magnaflow cat-back system (so he claimed at least). It took all my upgrades to edge him out by about a yard when we hit 120mph. His nose was around my front tire.....I was quite disapointed. Hopefully he was just lying about his mods.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
692
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
K
Project Ideas (2006 S197)
  • Kitsune187
  • Apr 22, 2019
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2019
Kitsune187
K
S
SOLD 2003 Mach 1 in Black - 60k Miles - T56 - Street/Road Course Setup
  • Seikenfreak
  • Oct 3, 2018
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 8, 2019
Seikenfreak
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?