• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

2v 5.4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frankenstang838
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
F

Frankenstang838

Member
Oct 31, 2005
37
0
7
Tell City, Indiana
Sep 12, 2009
#1
  • Sep 12, 2009
  • #1
I was with my dad test driving a truck today. It was an 01 F-150 Crew Cab 2WD with a 5.4L. That thing was a beast. What are the do's and don'ts if i decided to change directions and do a 5.4 swap out of a truck? Are the intakes the same? will my computer run it? Will my tranny bolt up? Have any of you guys done this? Just wanting some input, cause i think it wouldn't be a bad idea if it wouldn't require changing alot of stuff.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Sep 12, 2009
#2
  • Sep 12, 2009
  • #2
Frankenstang838 said:
Are the intakes the same?
Click to expand...

I don't believe so.

will my computer run it?
Click to expand...

You'd probably need a custom tune to get it running right.

Will my tranny bolt up?
Click to expand...

Yes.

Keep in mind that the 5.4L uses a different, taller block to allow for the longer stroke. This moves the cylinder heads up and outward making things a tight fit. A standard 4.6L intake manifold won't work as the cylinder head ports end up further apart due to the taller deck height. You might find some adapter plates to make it work but this will just move the intake even higher. There may be hood interference issues then. There's probably enough slack in the wiring harness or it can be made by customizing loom and wire-management components.

The exhaust won't just bolt up since the manifolds are higher and further apart so some customization will be needed there too.
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Sep 12, 2009
#3
  • Sep 12, 2009
  • #3
Not really worth it IMO. You don't get much more HP (although the TQ increase is nice). If you were going to swap the 4.6 for a 5.4, I'd make sure it was a DOHC 5.4
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Sep 12, 2009
#4
  • Sep 12, 2009
  • #4
a navigater 5.4 is the ****z, i wanna do it to mine but its time consuming and rite now my mustang is my dd, my other dd is being borrowed by my sister and law
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Sep 12, 2009
#5
  • Sep 12, 2009
  • #5
You'll either need intake adapters (cramps power, bad gas mileage), or the HPS 4.6 to 5.4 intake manifold (about $600?), your 4.6 computer will run the 5.4 with a tune, you need to widen your mid-pipe so it can fit to the exhaust manifolds. That's the jist of it, but there is some other stuff to address.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Sep 13, 2009
#6
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #6
I know a guy who did the swap. his is in an 02 gt, stock truck manifolds, he went with the adapter plates for the pi intake. everything else was stock, and he laid down 250hp but 376ft! but as soon as it hit 4500rpm the power fell straight off. I wonder what his car could really make if it was set up right. but he said it was noticeably faster with the 4.6 cause it would make more hp and rev out longer.
 

Pearl02

Member
Nov 27, 2004
496
0
16
Kansas City
Sep 13, 2009
#7
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #7
Mr. Rustypwnz said:
I know a guy who did the swap. his is in an 02 gt, stock truck manifolds, he went with the adapter plates for the pi intake. everything else was stock, and he laid down 250hp but 376ft! but as soon as it hit 4500rpm the power fell straight off. I wonder what his car could really make if it was set up right. but he said it was noticeably faster with the 4.6 cause it would make more hp and rev out longer.
Click to expand...

I'm not surprised. The cam profiles are different for the truck. It's designed for low end torque which is what a truck needs to pull and haul. It's not designed to spin up to 6 grand. The owner of a local Mustang tuning place here in KC transplanted a V10 from a F250 or 350 into his 97 Stang. I don't know how he did it. It's very inpressive. When I last talk to him, he was trying to find a cam that performed better past 4500 rpm's. Pearl02.
 
F

Frankenstang838

Member
Oct 31, 2005
37
0
7
Tell City, Indiana
Sep 13, 2009
#8
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #8
humm...i think i'll just stick with my lil 4six for right now. it just sounded like a neat idea. lol thanks guys.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Sep 13, 2009
#9
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #9
First off, the 5.4 2V and 4.6 2V have the EXACT SAME CAMSHAFTS.

Second off, the 5.4 2V is not a performance engine. Even with the best parts and setup properly, it is out of breath by 5000 RPM. I am tired of explaining why the 5.4 2V is not a performance engine and never will be, do a search on the subject or accept the 5.4 2V for what it is, a truck engine...
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Sep 14, 2009
#10
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #10
TGJ said:
First off, the 5.4 2V and 4.6 2V have the EXACT SAME CAMSHAFTS.

Second off, the 5.4 2V is not a performance engine. Even with the best parts and setup properly, it is out of breath by 5000 RPM. I am tired of explaining why the 5.4 2V is not a performance engine and never will be, do a search on the subject or accept the 5.4 2V for what it is, a truck engine...
Click to expand...


Where is our favorite friend to chime in on this topic? I heard he gave up and went FI.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Sep 14, 2009
#11
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #11
Winters98GT said:
Where is our favorite friend to chime in on this topic? I heard he gave up and went FI.
Click to expand...

Last I read on Bill was that he gave up on his 5.4 3V N/A project and has a running 4.6L 4V FI car. I haven't read any updates after that.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Sep 14, 2009
#12
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #12
^ ive seen some of those threads........

yeah, 5.4's are low end tq monsters, great if you towing a boat, or mudding, but in a car you want high rpm power..........
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 14, 2009
#13
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #13
Pearl02 said:
I'm not surprised. The cam profiles are different for the truck. It's designed for low end torque which is what a truck needs to pull and haul. It's not designed to spin up to 6 grand.
Click to expand...

As far as I know, all of the factory PI heads use the same cam profiles. What hurts you is when you try to make 330ci breath through the same intake as that was originally designed for 281ci. The 4.6L car engine has a long runner, small diameter intake that is made to promote torque in the lower and mid regions to make of for the loss recognized with its small displacement. Going with addapter plates adds another inch to the already long runner length, which increases the problem. Plenty of torque down low, with no gain in horsepower.

Also, the 5.4L still sufferes from the small bore and makes up for its displacement with a longer stroke. Great for torque, but really isn't going to do anything to promote deep breathing at high RPM. Unless you're running some form of forced induction on the 5.4L engine, you're not going to see any substantial gain in usable horsepower.

But...when you do add forced inductions, you're rewarded with plenty of both. The Roushcharger kit for my 5.4L 3V engine promotes 445hp and 500lbs/ft with only 5-6psi....and that's one of the more conservative Positive Displacement kits on the market. That's unheard of power levels for a 4.6L....it doesn't matter how many valves its sporting.
 
F

Frankenstang838

Member
Oct 31, 2005
37
0
7
Tell City, Indiana
Sep 14, 2009
#14
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #14
TGJ said:
First off, the 5.4 2V and 4.6 2V have the EXACT SAME CAMSHAFTS.

Second off, the 5.4 2V is not a performance engine. Even with the best parts and setup properly, it is out of breath by 5000 RPM. I am tired of explaining why the 5.4 2V is not a performance engine and never will be, do a search on the subject or accept the 5.4 2V for what it is, a truck engine...
Click to expand...

Cool, i really haven't planned on a power adder other than Nitrous, or a swap for that matter. But appearently a 5.4 swap isn't a good idea for a car unless ya plan on boosting. I really like the whole pos/neg thing goin on....puts things into better perspective. i like TGJ's the best tho.....he's clearly fed up with puttin his .02 in on this subject....but blunt is good.
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Sep 14, 2009
#15
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #15
OTOH...how often do you hit 5000+ RPM in a daily driven street car?

sure a 5.4 won't make the dyno numbers to impress the internet experts, but all that very usable, low end torque could make for a pretty entertaining street car...

now I've never driven a 5.4 Mustang (and I suspect that's true for most folks here)...but 'back in the day' I had a Galaxie with a 400M and that has the same "not as much horse power as the 351" rep as a 5.4 has...but in real world, day to day driving, that car surprised the heck out of people with all it's torque
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Sep 14, 2009
#16
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #16
mransr said:
OTOH...how often do you hit 5000+ RPM in a daily driven street car?

sure a 5.4 won't make the dyno numbers to impress the internet experts, but all that very usable, low end torque could make for a pretty entertaining street car...

now I've never driven a 5.4 Mustang (and I suspect that's true for most folks here)...but 'back in the day' I had a Galaxie with a 400M and that has the same "not as much horse power as the 351" rep as a 5.4 has...but in real world, day to day driving, that car surprised the heck out of people with all it's torque
Click to expand...

In the real world, races are won with higher HP/weight and better drivers... on the street, torque is mostly irrelevent within reason. A small V8 at the same power level as a big v8 with more torque won't really feel any slower when driven well. I used to have a '74 Camaro (~4000 lbs) with a 460 big block... about 375-400 Hp and ~500 ft-lbs of torque. The thing was a monster, but all that torque really did for it was burn the ever loving piss out of the tires. I'm sure it was marginally faster than my Mustang, probably a mid 13 car... not enough of a difference to really be felt.

What I'm trying to get at is that it had a good 200 ft-lbs of torque on the mustang (8 lbs per lb-ft versus 10.67), but it was only marginally faster, and when you get down to it, both cars could launch just about as hard as each other... the '74 would burn the tires if you punched it @ 40 MPH in 2nd (TH350), but that's really the only difference...
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 14, 2009
#17
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #17
mransr said:
'back in the day' I had a Galaxie with a 400M and that has the same "not as much horse power as the 351" rep as a 5.4 has...but in real world, day to day driving, that car surprised the heck out of people with all it's torque
Click to expand...

Surprised people with it low end torque I don't doubt, but in the end it was still an 18-second car.

The point is, you need to strike a balance of both in order to make a fast car. My car makes diesel like torque (465lbs/ft....430lbs/ft of which, is seen as low as 2,000RPM) but relatively sedate horsepower levels by comparison, which is why it runs high-12's/low-13's instead of low-11's.
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Sep 15, 2009
#18
  • Sep 15, 2009
  • #18
again...there isn't much doubt that a built 4.6 is faster than an equivalent 5.4 on the track...but for a car that is seldom, if ever, on a track, I'm just saying that a 5.4 might be a reasonable choice for someone interested just having a fun, low-buck street car...

and I know the 5.4 trucks are faster than the 4.6 trucks...


(BTW some guy named Carroll Shelby once said: "Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." ...although it should probably have been "a broad powerband wins races", rather than just torque, but that wouldn't have been as catchy a quote )
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 15, 2009
#19
  • Sep 15, 2009
  • #19
mransr said:
again...there isn't much doubt that a built 4.6 is faster than an equivalent 5.4 on the track...but for a car that is seldom, if ever, on a track, I'm just saying that a 5.4 might be a reasonable choice for someone interested just having a fun, low-buck street car...
Click to expand...

I guess it all depends on your definition of fun. If burning tires and sliding the rear end around is your thing, then yes....I'd say a 5.4L under the hood would be a lot of fun.

If getting walked by bolt on 4.6L cars after the first 500ft and adding unnecessary weight to the nose of your vehicle (negatively affecting braking and handling) isn't your bag, then I would probably advise against it.
 

wmburns

SN Certified Technician
Aug 14, 2009
5,892
514
204
Houston Texas
Sep 15, 2009
#20
  • Sep 15, 2009
  • #20
For the average joe, installing a 5.4 is a LOT of work. Sure it can be done. I have read several post regarding it. I also think it is telling that the cars are SOLD after doing sooo much work.

If it was up to me, I spend the $$'s on a name brand super charger kit. It will bolt up and will work as advertised.

If you had $$'s to burn, I suspect the breathing problem could be solved by a supercharger. But then way not build a stroker 4.6? If that is not enough, add a supercharger. Again, not tons of custom work with the possibility of a less than desireable outcome.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Supercharger Options 5.4 32V Intech
  • Germangazguzzler
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Apr 23, 2025
RaggedGT
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
576
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
425
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 16, 2024
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?