• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

3:73 vs 4:10

  • Thread starter Thread starter RsStanG1987
  • Start date Start date Sep 22, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
S

Sir Hacksalot

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2001
363
0
0
Ankeny, IA
Sep 27, 2004
#41
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #41
huskerpower02 said:
AND WHO THE HELL BUYS A MUSTANG TO WORRY ABOUT GAS MILAGE?!?!?!
Click to expand...

The same one's that buy a mustang with a V6!

Hax
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Sep 27, 2004
#42
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #42
If you're careful guys - you can have good performance and reasonable gas mileage from an efi V-8. Only to those with limited thinking does it have to be an either/or situation.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 27, 2004
#43
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #43
Michael Yount said:
If you're careful guys - you can have good performance and reasonable gas mileage from an efi V-8. Only to those with limited thinking does it have to be an either/or situation.
Click to expand...

Exactly...the ls1 engines have gotten 30-31mpg on the highway w/ a 6spd...and they dyno just under 300rwhp stock (average)...some higher...
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Sep 27, 2004
#44
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #44
And that's just one example; I'm sure there are many newer Mustangs out there that get reasonable mileage. I remain amazed that the 3000 lb. 'aero-brick' I drive has great performance, and consistantly knocks down 19 mpg around town, and 24-26 on the road. Every now and then even a blind squirrel finds an acorn...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 27, 2004
#45
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #45
Michael Yount said:
And that's just one example; I'm sure there are many newer Mustangs out there that get reasonable mileage. I remain amazed that the 3000 lb. 'aero-brick' I drive has great performance, and consistantly knocks down 19 mpg around town, and 24-26 on the road. Every now and then even a blind squirrel finds an acorn...
Click to expand...

I remember that last quote...must be your favorite

Yeah there have been a few cases where the 99+ Gt got 29-30mpg out of the 5spd (327 gear ratio)...and the ls1 that I mentioned above has 342's thru a T-56...
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Sep 27, 2004
#46
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #46
I think it all has to do with relativity. A v8 puts out more torque then a 4 banger period. So in turn these things can do more work with less of a load on the engine and do it in a more efficient manner by not having to turn such a high rpm to get a respectable amount of power on the pavement. When my mustang was completely stock I did 90% highway driving and got roughly 25 mpg - yet I got grief on how that shouldn't be so from a few friends that had 4 cylinder trucks and others with v6 cars because I either barely beat them or matched them overall. However it also relates back to those numbers for rpms while cruising. Many were humming along at the 3000-3500 rpm range on the highway while I was churning a mere 1400. I gaurantee you however though if I had to buzz along at the same 3000-3500 range (that is to compare in a fair way) that I most definitely would be getting some considerably worse gas mileage - 18 to be exact when I actually did it with no o/d one tank full.

The lessons are there for everything and this is like all the others, but rest assured your gas mileage will always suffer to some extent when the final drive ratio is raised.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Sep 27, 2004
#47
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #47
Just returned on a 700 mile round trip to-from Augusta in my wife's 4-cylinder powered car. We ran in the 70-80 mph speed range, where the car revs in the 3400-3800 rpm range - and we averaged 37.7 mpg for the trip. The 4 banger can make the required power more efficiently even at the higher revs - and the car's better aero/lighter weight don't hurt either.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
442
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
609
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
333
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?