• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

302 - 306

  • Thread starter Thread starter LxVert
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jul 31, 2008
#21
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #21
I would highly......very highly suggest you go with the 331/347 combo I listed for you. Deck the block at 0 and run flat top pistons. With a 331 decked to 0, flat top pistons, and a 60cc chambered head you should be right at 10.1:1.

Forget the damn 306!!!!!!!!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 31, 2008
#22
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #22
Stopsign32 - A 306 is a cheaper option.

There are pros and cons to each.

A camshaft plays an often overlooked role to compression and octane rated needing.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jul 31, 2008
#23
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #23
5spd GT said:
Stopsign32 - A 306 is a cheaper option.

There are pros and cons to each.
Click to expand...

Ofcourse it is a cheaper option. But for basically $500 more than what his 306 will cost what other mod could you do to the car for the same amount of money that will give the same performance all the time as a 331 or 347?

Also what are the pros and cons?
 
L

LxVert

Member
Dec 26, 2003
80
0
6
Aug 1, 2008
#24
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #24
I want to do a 331 or a 347 but as of right now that extra 500 would break the bank, I was figuring that this cheap 306 build would hold me over until I'm out of school. Once I'm done with school and dont have to worry about sending in a $10,000 check every semester I'm going to build up a nice stoker motor out of my other block.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Aug 1, 2008
#25
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #25
Well then get a set of flat top pistons with valve reliefs in them, deck the block at 0, and figure out what you need to mill your heads to to get 10.1:1 compression. Somewhere around 56cc I'd guess.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 1, 2008
#26
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #26
5spd GT said:
Stopsign32 - A 306 is a cheaper option.

There are pros and cons to each.

A camshaft plays an often overlooked role to compression and octane rated needing.
Click to expand...

Right. However, dynamic compression ratio, though important, I think is beyond the scope of this thread. But if boost was ever introduced, a different cam and altered ignition timing could be looked at. But I don't know if getting that deep into power making on boost makes any sense if the foundation starts with hypereutectic pistons... Like he said, right now its all about getting the car back on the road for cheap.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 1, 2008
#27
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #27
I have a 10.5:1 engine I daily drive and it runs great at 89 octane, and I have ran 87 octane.

This was with a camshaft for a 9.2-9.4:1 engine.

You could run a 10.8:1 static compression engine (BDC divided TDC volume) and have no issues with 89 octane. You could run a 9.5:1 static compression engine (BDC divided TDC volume) and have issues with 93 octane.

The camshaft is big. The intake valve closing point ABDC becomes key here.

By the way, I was speaking on N/A terms, not boost as was mentioned.
 
L

LxVert

Member
Dec 26, 2003
80
0
6
Aug 13, 2008
#28
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #28
So when I had been going back and forth with the machine shop they said if they could get them in my price range they would get a set of forged pistons for me, other wise it was going to be hypers. Well I never remembered to ask the other day when I picked up the motor what pistons they got. The pistons that came in the box were Speed Pro pistons, how can I tell just by looking at them wether they are forged or hypers?
The machine shop is a small mom and pop kinda place and they are closed for the next 2 weeks for vaca so I can't call them up to ask.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 14, 2008
#29
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #29
I doubt there is any real distinct difference in the appearance of material between the two different pistons. Your best bet would be to have markings on the pistons or part numbers from the boxes they came in. Do some homework online and see if you can find any info from the part numbers. If not, I'd say give Speed Pro a call.
 

backfocus

Member
Sep 3, 2004
254
3
18
Little Rock, AR
Aug 14, 2008
#30
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #30
Ofcourse it is a cheaper option. But for basically $500 more than what his 306 will cost what other mod could you do to the car for the same amount of money that will give the same performance all the time as a 331 or 347?
Click to expand...

More like a $1000 buy the time you also add a balancer and new flywheel, along with getting it all balanced. LxVert as stated early your best bet for your stated budget is the 306. As far as the pistons forged or hypers, many times it will have forged stamped on the pistons, but some manufacturers may not, the best way is to look up the number or call Speed Pro. They were very helpful to me when I was trying to identify some pistons, they no longer made.

As 5sp stated the cam is where you can make your motor better. You might want to look into a custom cam, so you could get the powerband you want and really setup the combo to work together. Although you will be above the $1000 dollars of your budget, as a custom will run around $300 and up, plus new lifters etc. but it would help you get to most out of your small cube combo. Just a thought!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 14, 2008
#31
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #31
Some people will argue this, but the stock 5.0 cam is actually pretty decent in a street motor with stockish heads. I've seen N/A motor build-ups where the cam wasn't installed and dynoed until the heads and intake had already been, and the motor only saw 15 more hp at the flywheel with the aftermarket cam over the stock one. I say just get the car moving then save money for big mods down the road.
 

backfocus

Member
Sep 3, 2004
254
3
18
Little Rock, AR
Aug 14, 2008
#32
  • Aug 14, 2008
  • #32
For some reason I was thinking he already non-stock heads and intake, but after reading, its all stock, so no on the cam, as NikwoaC stated it won't yield you enough yet. I would only suggest it if you were changing heads and intake both. The stock cam is a fairly good cam what the component it had from the factory.

If your goal is to just get it back to running you are on the right track.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
880
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Motor given to me and I’d like to rebuild it what do I need to do
  • Creomod
  • Dec 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
345
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 16, 2024
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
709
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
421
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Thursday at 8:57 AM
TPony
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?