• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

302 for airplane

  • Thread starter Thread starter dgonzalez
  • Start date Start date Oct 7, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,271
17,959
224
Massachusetts
Oct 7, 2006
#21
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #21
Isn't the 5.0 also a poor performer at altitude? At sea level it has great performance but the guys at tracks located a mile or so above sea level have a lot of issues making power.

I realize a 5.0 can be built for far less than the $10K or so needed for a Lycoming engine, but i don't think it's gonna work.
 

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
Asheboro, NC
Oct 7, 2006
#22
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #22
slow95gt said:
what about like a gsr b18 vtec engine? really light, and it will go to 9k with out even thinking about it. it would get off the ground alot easier also.
Click to expand...

But when the engine kicks in the vtec, the propellor will go nuts! Lol. I dunno if they'd make the torque to get a plane off the ground, but then again I dunno crap about that stuff lol.

But seriously, good luck with your project.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Oct 7, 2006
#23
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #23
The more torque a motor has the more torque steer the plane will have. Maning, it will be harder to keep flying in a straight line. A Van's RV6 would be te perfect plane for messing around in. Vans Although, I did see one nose over when a beginner pilot started the engine with the throttle wide open.

Me, I'm much more of a puddle jumping kind of guy. I hope to end up in a Maule with STOL properties Maule Website
 

Mavrick

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
2,264
0
46
Collingwood, ON
Oct 7, 2006
#24
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #24
Mustang5L5 said:
Isn't the 5.0 also a poor performer at altitude?
Click to expand...

That's the first thing that came to my head.. I remember watching a 95 Cobra R race up Pikes Peak and it was really struggling... couldn't get the RPM's up very well at altitude!
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 7, 2006
#25
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #25
Mavrick said:
That's the first thing that came to my head.. I remember watching a 95 Cobra R race up Pikes Peak and it was really struggling... couldn't get the RPM's up very well at altitude!
Click to expand...

That's when you hang a pair of Rayjays on there......to get the intake pressure back up! What about those Allison V12s the real Mustangs had?

What does a typical 300hp aero engine ususally weigh? What about Mazda rotaries?
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,359
209
114
Ohio
Oct 7, 2006
#26
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #26
jrichker said:
I spent 11 years as an aircraft mechanic & 8 of that as a FAA licensed A&P. Believe me when I say, the 5.0 engine is not what you want in that particular experimental aircraft. You will never get the CG in limits, even with an all aluminum block & heads. You would need a reduction gear assembly to ger the prop speed down to reasonable limits. These are commonly found when automotive engines are used in airboats.That will add more weight to the engine, making it even harder to get the CG anywhere near the center of lift.
Click to expand...

I have had my A&P for 12 or 13 Years now and I agree with you as the 5.0 is Far from Ideal, I would try to find an Aircooled Flat Engine to Power the Plane.
 

mattmcdan

Member
Apr 19, 2006
176
0
19
Okeechobee, Florida
Oct 8, 2006
#27
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #27
Car engines suck on airboats let alone putting a 5.0L in an airplane. They don't hold up to the abuse and vibration from the prop. I truly think you would be better off trying to find a salvage plane or such and using the engine from it. my .02
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,271
17,959
224
Massachusetts
Oct 8, 2006
#28
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #28
65ShelbyClone said:
What about those Allison V12s the real Mustangs had?
Click to expand...



The allison's suck. The Merlin engine in the Mustang was a much better choice!




BTW, i remember a long time ago some guy tried to tell me the Ford Mustang was named the Mustang because they put all the leftover engines from the P51 Mustang into them. I looked at him like he had 3 heads.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 8, 2006
#29
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #29
What was bad about the Allisons? Not that it matters, the P-51s are awesome anyway.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,271
17,959
224
Massachusetts
Oct 8, 2006
#30
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #30
65ShelbyClone said:
What was bad about the Allisons? Not that it matters, the P-51s are awesome anyway.
Click to expand...

The allisons were poor performers at high altitudes.

The P-51 was just average until someone got the bright idea to stuff the rolls royce Merlin engine in it. Then it became a great plane
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Oct 8, 2006
#31
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #31
why not just bolt a pratt jt8d up to er!!
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Oct 8, 2006
#32
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #32
It's kind of dissappointing to realize that our favorite engine may not be a good airplane engine.

It would be fairly straightforward to get, say, 225 to 250 hp at 3000 rpm, and you could focus on that w/o worrying about having to rev higher. I have seen a few v8s converted to aircraft in magazines, but I don't remember seeing a 302. I would think there would be some engineering to work out how to have a flywheel and starter, as well as mount the prop.

All that said, I read as much as possible about aircraft piston engines, since lots of things we think are recent were tried on them a long time ago, superchargers, turbos, nitrous, water injection, exhaust gas temp monitoring, etc.

It would be interesting to see the weights and layouts of some comparable piston aircraft engines, to see how they compare.

Keep us informed on how this turns out.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Oct 8, 2006
#33
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #33
Most aircraft engines are very lightweight. They average 1 lb per cubic inch, the typical 4 cylinder Lycoming is 320-360 cubes. They also average about .5-.6 HP per cubic inch. The peak RPM on an engine without a reduction gearbox is about 2700-2800 RPM.
 

SuperStang83

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2001
1,693
0
49
Boyertown, Pa
Oct 8, 2006
#34
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #34
I don't really have much of an idea, but it sounds really cool!
 

GSP393

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
217
0
0
Orange County, Texas
Oct 8, 2006
#35
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #35
I don't know anything about sbf's in an airplane, but Corvair engines have been used successfully for many years powering aircraft.
 

Aryan15

Member
Sep 22, 2003
236
0
17
CA
Oct 9, 2006
#36
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #36
Can you actually get a supplement type certificate for this type of major alteration. I have a hard time believing that the FAA will sign off on this.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,359
209
114
Ohio
Oct 10, 2006
#37
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #37
Aryan15 said:
Can you actually get a supplement type certificate for this type of major alteration. I have a hard time believing that the FAA will sign off on this.
Click to expand...


You can pull off a few thing under the Experimental tag.
 

88Stang331

New Member
Mar 30, 2006
239
0
0
Oct 10, 2006
#38
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #38
the 5.0 works awesome in my car...but my car isn't thousands of feet in the air.
 

VG30DE

Founding Member
Sep 16, 2002
364
0
0
Dudley, MA
Oct 10, 2006
#39
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #39
Advance the cam, brings the low end power way up. And a roots supercharger would provide more than enough low end power, but may be too heavy.
 
B

BlackBaer5.0

Member
Nov 26, 2003
100
0
16
Oct 10, 2006
#40
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #40
Here Is an interesting artlicle about ht pro's and con's for automotive engines in planes...

part 1 http://www.kitplanes.com/magazine/engines/156-1.phtml

part 2 http://www.kitplanes.com/magazine/engines/155-1.phtml
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?