• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

306 dyno results

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date Jun 19, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Jun 23, 2006
#21
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #21
tmoss said:
The Holley intake is not the best choice for that combo.........
Click to expand...
i was thinking the same thing. im also going to assume that since you didnt mention it that allong with the stock maf, the throttle body is stock too. those are 2 other things that are going to hurt the numbers on the dyno. this is yet another example of a mismatched combo hurting power output.
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Jun 23, 2006
#22
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #22
TheRedBlur said:
Loose is fast is a term referring to driving style, not sloppy engine build.
Click to expand...
Not that it matters, but check Car & Driver's long term tests. They always pick up 2 tenths of a second or more in 0 to 60 and 1/4 mile after 40k to 60k of driving. So that level of wear clearly does free up some horsepower. And I would guess that you are right that at the end of a motor's life, you probably start losing some power.
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Jun 24, 2006
#23
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #23
word, engines usually do generate more horsepower after a few miles, they have to break in, bearings gotta find their favorite place on the caps, rings as well, etc.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 25, 2006
#24
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #24
The Red Blur - You have got it twisted...go PM 25thMustang who routinely runs in those classes. Loose is less friction...we are talking thousandths of looseness, not inches. Think about it...

I am not talking about suspension, it is not related.

Tight engines eat up a bit of hp...loose engines gain a bit. It is all them little tricks...

When these guys run these cars, they aren't worried about longevity...they race them in drag racing classes.

I was talking about loose connecting rod bolts...lol.
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Jun 25, 2006
#25
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #25
I'm open to that.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New TFS top end build article
  • FastDriver
  • Feb 3, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2024
FastDriver
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Fox Am I The Only One Shocked By My Dyno Results?
  • Vinnyc1487
  • Sep 8, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2021
revhead347
F
1993 Cobra flooding
  • FireFoxCobra_SVT93
  • May 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2023
nickyb
Engine Cam idle and timing questions - big cam, little knowledge
  • Justin87
  • Jul 6, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2021
Middleagecrisis
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?