• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

306cid camshaft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Black95GT_Kid
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2006

Black95GT_Kid

Member
May 3, 2005
57
1
8
Cochranville PA
Apr 10, 2006
#1
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #1
im building a 306 with stock heads and intake port matched or possibly a cobra intake and i put a thread on here sayin that i was goin to use a e303 cam and was told to use a different cam so i found a crane cam with a Duration of 276/ 282, and a Lift of .513/ .529 is this better?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Apr 10, 2006
#2
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #2
Black95GT_Kid said:
im building a 306 with stock heads and intake port matched or possibly a cobra intake and i put a thread on here sayin that i was goin to use a e303 cam and was told to use a different cam so i found a crane cam with a Duration of 276/ 282, and a Lift of .513/ .529 is this better?
Click to expand...
Those are the advertised duration numbers. What are the duration numbers @ 0.050"?

Joe
 

Black95GT_Kid

Member
May 3, 2005
57
1
8
Cochranville PA
Apr 10, 2006
#3
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #3
the duration at .050 inch is 214/220
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Apr 10, 2006
#4
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #4
That cam would work pretty well by the sound of it. What is the LSA?

It has decent ramp rates with 1.6 rockers, but if you wanted more performance, you could throw on 1.7 rockers. The only problem is that you are going to need a GOOD spring. Probably something with about 130-140 on the seat and 360 open. They are probably going to be kind of hard to find because I believe the spring pockets for the E7 heads aren't that wide....

Joe
 

Black95GT_Kid

Member
May 3, 2005
57
1
8
Cochranville PA
Apr 10, 2006
#5
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #5
i already have cobra rocker and new springs i put on a few months ago but thanks for the advise. im not entirely sure what the LSA is but i think it is 112
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Apr 10, 2006
#6
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #6
better put a cobra on it or you are gonna slow down with a cam and stock intake/stock heads

I would just leave your stock cam in there and maybe retard it 4 degrees with the cobra intake

of course i ran a stock piston 302 with stock e7s and an e cam 1.7s and cobra and rpm intake. it worked well for me, but you will have much less headaches and the same results with a stock cam
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Apr 10, 2006
#7
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #7
95snoozer said:
better put a cobra on it or you are gonna slow down with a cam and stock intake/stock heads

I would just leave your stock cam in there and maybe retard it 4 degrees with the cobra intake

of course i ran a stock piston 302 with stock e7s and an e cam 1.7s and cobra and rpm intake. it worked well for me, but you will have much less headaches and the same results with a stock cam
Click to expand...
This is true!

I was assuming that he had all the supporting junk too....may have been a bad assumption on my part.

Joe
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Apr 10, 2006
#8
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #8
Im a big believer in the stock cam. Im running afr 165's, 1.7 rr, ported cobra intake, and accufab 70mm, and a tune, all with the stock cam. great manners, no computer issues, and pushing close to 290 at the wheels. this is all on the stock 302 bottom end. just a thought. people dont give the stocker much credit, but it can save alot of headaches and is pretty darn good for a street driven car.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Apr 11, 2006
#9
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #9
84convertablegt said:
Im a big believer in the stock cam. Im running afr 165's, 1.7 rr, ported cobra intake, and accufab 70mm, and a tune, all with the stock cam. great manners, no computer issues, and pushing close to 290 at the wheels. this is all on the stock 302 bottom end. just a thought. people dont give the stocker much credit, but it can save alot of headaches and is pretty darn good for a street driven car.
Click to expand...
did you ever retard your cam?
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Apr 11, 2006
#10
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #10
95snoozer said:
did you ever retard your cam?
Click to expand...
Nope. What would that do?
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Apr 11, 2006
#11
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #11
IIRC advancing the cam gives more top end power (or moves the power curve forward) while retarding it moves the power back for more lowend grunt. I could have this backwards so don't take it to heart, hopefully some one will correct or confirm this.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Apr 11, 2006
#12
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #12
wytstang said:
IIRC advancing the cam gives more top end power (or moves the power curve forward) while retarding it moves the power back for more lowend grunt. I could have this backwards so don't take it to heart, hopefully some one will correct or confirm this.
Click to expand...

You do indeed have it backwards. That's why Snoozer suggested you retard the cam. Its a common and effective trick used by those limited to the stock cam in class racing.

Retarding the cam RETARDS when events occur, thus making them occur later then they "should," higher in the RPMs.

The reverse is true.

Camshafts are retarded for higher horsepower, advanced for low end.

Adam
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Apr 11, 2006
#13
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #13
84convertablegt said:
Nope. What would that do?
Click to expand...


move your powerband a lil higher. It will pull higher, peak higher and make more power. you could see 300 rwhp

I would definitely do it
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Apr 11, 2006
#14
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #14
If you want you can pick up a "STOCK" cam

one that is made by crower or AFM to the maximum tolerances of a stock cam.

This is what class racers use to maximize every bit of hp
 

Black95GT_Kid

Member
May 3, 2005
57
1
8
Cochranville PA
Apr 11, 2006
#15
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #15
i dont want to use my stock cam and i also do not have it. the car came with a cam but i dont know what it is that is why i am putting a new one in when i rebuild it
 

SVTCobra306

New Member
Oct 22, 2005
170
1
0
Ft. Bragg, NC
Apr 11, 2006
#16
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #16
Black95GT_Kid said:
im building a 306 with stock heads and intake port matched or possibly a cobra intake and i put a thread on here sayin that i was goin to use a e303 cam and was told to use a different cam so i found a crane cam with a Duration of 276/ 282, and a Lift of .513/ .529 is this better?
Click to expand...

Crane 2031 cam is what you listed. I have this cam. Very very drivable untuned. Caused really no issues with the computer.

Few facts: This was originally designed as a blower cam. It will hurt you compared to a custom or even some off the shelf cams with an N/A car. However add a power adder and the wide LSA brings the car to life (I saw nearly 200 RWHP and over 220 RWTQ on a 150 HP shot of nitrous with this cam). The exhaust valve closes earlier on this than an E cam, but the lope is very very similar to the E cam. It's really kinda in between the E and F cams.

This grind was designed for 1.7 RR's (was actually designed with the '93-'95 Cobra motor in mind). It will also typically require longer pushrods, somewhere between 6.300 and 6.310" pushrods.

As for springs Crane sells a cam/spring kit with this cam and specific springs for it. IIRC the closed pressure was like 117 or 120, open around 350. . I personally run FRPP springs on mine, shimmed to a higher spring pressure (don't remember specifics but it was kinda high). No issues with valve float.
 

SVTCobra306

New Member
Oct 22, 2005
170
1
0
Ft. Bragg, NC
Apr 11, 2006
#17
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #17
http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brow...=302 C.I.&partNumber=444225&partType=camshaft

Here's crane's link. I was a bit off on the valvespring specs...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
673
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
638
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?