• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

331 w/ ported GT40s

  • Thread starter Thread starter ntstock93
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Aug 30, 2007
#21
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #21
doubtful if YOU can pull the 400 HP on a set of heads and stock cam!! probably was done though!! And yes a dyno engine in a controlled dyno room isnt real life, and there was no comparison engines run to see an apple to apple comparison..

Yes, there have been a number of 400 +HP 302s on ported heads ( 289's and 5.0's) that seem realistic and do able, however NOT but the average Joe that puts a bottom end together , tosses in a camshaft, and heads and runs it!!

ALL that being said.. the same site as mentioned.. the P's with their meager 190/127 @ .500 will allow 391-424 HP, the GT40's.. 187/129 @ .500 will support 385-417 HP or maybe the X head.. that has a 215-155 @ .500 and will support 442/480 HP!!! Not to mention the PORTED E7s and their posted numbers will allow 446/ 484 HP on their 217 / 174 @.500 !! My heads are at 219/ 154 @ .500 lift!! Looking at the .600 lift , or the .700 lift is a total waste of time on the average street/ race car!! the Low to mid are more important than the total lift , as you go thru those numbers two times , and peak only once!! Dont for get the runner CC's.. the Valve job... the FASTER the engine builds power the SOONER the car is in front!!

There is a point when the average guy and shop are surpassed in the HP game.. 320 WHP is do able on a FMS cam and ported heads!! if you pull the 16% for drive train loss.. you are in the 380-390 BHP range!! There is no reason why there cannot be 350 WHP with a 351W on the Stock GT40 heads and definitely with PORTED GT40 heads!! ( 302-302 stuff)

You push in there the experienced builder, the correct camshaft, the intake and fuel.. there are guys hitting the 400 BHP mark on STOCK SBF heads!! Just be cause it is not the norm.. it is out there , and is being done!! Again the 302-302 is too strong of a statement!! 302 parts can and do equal MORE than 302 power!! add some boost.. or Nitrous.. and you can run easy 450 to 475 WHP on the ported E7s or GT40s...

SOOOOOOooo.... can it be done!! YES!! is it done all the time...NO!! is there more power in the AFR / TF/ aftermarket heads.. HELL YES!! But is it a guarantee for that power...NO!! The aftermarket is great for the SBF, but buying and bolting on, wanting a 12 sec ride ( 11 or 10s on power adders) Save the money.. go with the modified ported parts and remember.. 302 parts DOESNT mean 302 POWER!!
( and WHAT is 302 power anyway??)
If your looking for a 10 sec N/A ride in a race car (5.0) .. then the aftermarket is a good thing !!

Just me......................................

Thumper
 
R

rednotch1234

New Member
Sep 1, 2005
9
0
0
Aug 30, 2007
#22
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #22
302 power = 225fwhp stock - 400fwhp or less modified n/a of course. I know you can make more but then streetabilty and you pocket suffers
 

ntstock93

New Member
Jul 17, 2006
18
0
1
Central New York
Aug 31, 2007
#23
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #23
thumper460 said:
doubtful if YOU can pull the 400 HP on a set of heads and stock cam!! probably was done though!! And yes a dyno engine in a controlled dyno room isnt real life, and there was no comparison engines run to see an apple to apple comparison..

Yes, there have been a number of 400 +HP 302s on ported heads ( 289's and 5.0's) that seem realistic and do able, however NOT but the average Joe that puts a bottom end together , tosses in a camshaft, and heads and runs it!!

ALL that being said.. the same site as mentioned.. the P's with their meager 190/127 @ .500 will allow 391-424 HP, the GT40's.. 187/129 @ .500 will support 385-417 HP or maybe the X head.. that has a 215-155 @ .500 and will support 442/480 HP!!! Not to mention the PORTED E7s and their posted numbers will allow 446/ 484 HP on their 217 / 174 @.500 !! My heads are at 219/ 154 @ .500 lift!! Looking at the .600 lift , or the .700 lift is a total waste of time on the average street/ race car!! the Low to mid are more important than the total lift , as you go thru those numbers two times , and peak only once!! Dont for get the runner CC's.. the Valve job... the FASTER the engine builds power the SOONER the car is in front!!

There is a point when the average guy and shop are surpassed in the HP game.. 320 WHP is do able on a FMS cam and ported heads!! if you pull the 16% for drive train loss.. you are in the 380-390 BHP range!! There is no reason why there cannot be 350 WHP with a 351W on the Stock GT40 heads and definitely with PORTED GT40 heads!! ( 302-302 stuff)

You push in there the experienced builder, the correct camshaft, the intake and fuel.. there are guys hitting the 400 BHP mark on STOCK SBF heads!! Just be cause it is not the norm.. it is out there , and is being done!! Again the 302-302 is too strong of a statement!! 302 parts can and do equal MORE than 302 power!! add some boost.. or Nitrous.. and you can run easy 450 to 475 WHP on the ported E7s or GT40s...

SOOOOOOooo.... can it be done!! YES!! is it done all the time...NO!! is there more power in the AFR / TF/ aftermarket heads.. HELL YES!! But is it a guarantee for that power...NO!! The aftermarket is great for the SBF, but buying and bolting on, wanting a 12 sec ride ( 11 or 10s on power adders) Save the money.. go with the modified ported parts and remember.. 302 parts DOESNT mean 302 POWER!!
( and WHAT is 302 power anyway??)
If your looking for a 10 sec N/A ride in a race car (5.0) .. then the aftermarket is a good thing !!

Just me......................................

Thumper
Click to expand...

"the FASTER the engine builds power" This is exactly what I am looking for. Im not looking for a high RPM screamer. Im not looking for a"total hp" number. I would like a stop light to stop light killer and something that can rip tires right off idle and pull till about 6000 rpms. More of an 1/8th mile car. So with that said (actually typed) the 331/347 stroker with ported GT-40 heads would be what I am looking for?
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Aug 31, 2007
#24
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #24
rednotch1234 said:
Sorry but those afrs are not gt-40s , And those number are flywheel hp without any access...... Put that moter in a car and it wont put out any where near 400.
Click to expand...

I know, but I only what 351hp not 400hp

I have a 351 not 302
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Aug 31, 2007
#25
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #25
ntstock93 said:
"the FASTER the engine builds power" This is exactly what I am looking for. Im not looking for a high RPM screamer. Im not looking for a"total hp" number. I would like a stop light to stop light killer and something that can rip tires right off idle and pull till about 6000 rpms. More of an 1/8th mile car. So with that said (actually typed) the 331/347 stroker with ported GT-40 heads would be what I am looking for?
Click to expand...

That is what I have now, but It will get old. Sooner or later you will want big numbers. I want more N/A power so I can run less boost and more compression.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 31, 2007
#26
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #26
rednotch1234 said:
302 parts make 302 hp period
Click to expand...

Incorrect.

I have seen so many strokers in the 350rwhp range with afr 165's, edelbrock performers with the 1.9in. valve, performer and performer rpm intakes, and custom cam. The same parts (in order to save money) were on there previous 302/347 and would dyno 30-50hp less. Do the math
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 31, 2007
#27
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #27
enyawix said:
a 400hp 302 with stock cam!


http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=588067
Click to expand...

That engine was on an engine dyno with no accessories. It does not take into account drivetrain loss (15-18%) and accessory drag (10-20% est.). Plus they used little tricks, like retarding the stock cam and this and that.

If they would have did the same test with AFR's, TW's, Edel., and an aftermarket cam, you would see the number magically jump to maybe 475-500hp
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Aug 31, 2007
#28
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #28
5spd GT said:
That engine was on an engine dyno with no accessories. It does not take into account drivetrain loss (15-18%) and accessory drag (10-20% est.). Plus they used little tricks, like retarding the stock cam and this and that.

If they would have did the same test with AFR's, TW's, Edel., and an aftermarket cam, you would see the number magically jump to maybe 475-500hp
Click to expand...

I would like the the same test part for part, but with thumper's heads.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Sep 1, 2007
#29
  • Sep 1, 2007
  • #29
dyno..

COOL... set it up!! This is now going way off course... the 302 parts for 302 power, was what I was offended with.....!! That statement is wrong and mis-leading, that's all!! What is 302 power?? Yes IF you can get the power that the heads will support, the after market heads ( Non Ford) can support more power... but you cant!! a few can, thus these articles , but the mainstream can not!! SOOooooooo..... the 302 parts will supply the power most are looking for... esp on the budget!! And you must feel kinda funny when your doors were just handed to you, and you go over to talk to the guy, he raises the hood and you see iron FORD 302 heads... just a thought!!


Just me............................................

Thumper
 

ntstock93

New Member
Jul 17, 2006
18
0
1
Central New York
Sep 2, 2007
#30
  • Sep 2, 2007
  • #30
So what would be a perfect 347 combo with GT-40 heads that would pull like crazy off the line and pull till about 6000rpms. (kind of like a LT1 350 in the mid 1990's)

I have a used Cobra upper intake that I would like to use. What headers would be ideal? What compression ratio would work?
 

ntstock93

New Member
Jul 17, 2006
18
0
1
Central New York
Oct 20, 2007
#31
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #31
68keyblr said:
Yep, I've just dropped a 331 with ported GT-40s, cobra intake, 1.6 RR, TFS-1 cam, 9.75:1 compression into my '88 GT.

If all goes well this week I'll be firing it up on Saturday. I'll let you know what kind of power it makes
Click to expand...


Any updates?
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Oct 20, 2007
#32
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #32
ntstock93 said:
Any updates?
Click to expand...

I don't have any actual dyno numbers yet...just got the first 500 break in miles on it.

I can say this though - it runs like a raped ape! I've got stock 3.08 gears on it and 1st gear is basically useless it spins so bad. Once it hooks, look out!

An '02 LS-1 Camaro found out the hard way LOL. I had 2 passengers in the car and this Camaro starts bugging us...wouldn't leave us alone so I punched it when he did and walked away from him fairly easily.

My brother in law estimates 425 HP/TQ at the flywheel but I think that's probably on the high side...I'm guessing about 380-400.

Keep in mind, I'm still running the stock MAF, injectors, and throttle body!

After I install the 24# injectors, 70MM TB and 76MM MAF I'll take it to the dyno for a tune and report back
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 21, 2007
#33
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #33
when someone comes on a forum and says the "302 parts make 302 power" it just tells me he doesn't have the knowledge/expereience to do it. Mike Washington just posted some "Factory Stock" style unported E7 & HO intake results - 11.47 @ something like 116mph. Mike knows how to make it work. This IS a 100% race engine though.

Ported stock heads and ported HO intakes have made right at 300RWHP/330RWTQ on a 302-306ci engine. If that's "302 power" I'll take it for a nice street engine. Up that to Ported GT40s and a ported Explorer and we're into the 320-330RWHP on a 302-306. These are NOT race engines.

There is more than one way to skin a cat and if you choose the aftermarket route, that's cool, but don't come in forums hatin on stock parts becasue some people know how to make it work.
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Oct 21, 2007
#34
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #34
Amen Brother T-Moss. I can testify to that

A guy that works for me has a new Dodge Daytona. I took him for a ride and he could not believe how fast my Mustang is. When I popped the hood and showed him "all stock Ford parts" he simply couldn't believe it...It was awesome.

Used '93 Cobra Intake, Polished: $250
Used GT-40 Heads, ported w/ 1.6 FMS Roller Rockers: $550
Stock MAF and 19# injectors: $50

The look on a 5.7 Hemi owner's face when my "stock" Mustang smokes his Charger: Priceless!
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 21, 2007
#35
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #35
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?p=7295125#post7295125
 

ntstock93

New Member
Jul 17, 2006
18
0
1
Central New York
Apr 11, 2008
#36
  • Apr 11, 2008
  • #36
Proven 331/347 street driven combos

Im getting ready to get the bottom end. Im still up in the air about the top end.
Can some stroker owners throw up their combos and ET's.
 

Cobra912

Active Member
May 1, 2005
1,777
11
39
Wish I was anywhere but here
Apr 11, 2008
#37
  • Apr 11, 2008
  • #37
This is what I'm throwing in my 331 that I'm buildin right now. Hope to make at least 300 at the rear:

SRP pistons
Eagle crank/rods w/arp bolts
5.0 Edelbrock heads (1.9)
Canton tall covers
Harland Sharp 1.6 stud Rockers
nitrous cam NX264HR comps cam
main stud girdle
Canton 7qt pan (15620) w/ pick-up
FMS HV oil pump w/ hardened shaft
Crane lifters
FMS indexed double roller chain
Edelbrock Performer II upper/lower intake
Edelbrock 75 mm tb/spacer
TFS 1" spacer
28oz sfi billet flywheel
28oz streetdampr balancer
Ford Racing Water pump
FRPP 30lbs injectors
Pro-M 76mm mass air
Paxton fuel regulator
JLT cold air kit
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Apr 11, 2008
#38
  • Apr 11, 2008
  • #38
the 302 loves E85!

13:1 is safe on E85 at 12 degrees base timing!
The biggest factors limiting power being the lower intake and heads
 

StinkinLincoln

Member
Dec 9, 2006
240
0
17
Louisiana
Apr 11, 2008
#39
  • Apr 11, 2008
  • #39
wow we got a real close motor.

Cobra912 said:
This is what I'm throwing in my 331 that I'm buildin right now. Hope to make at least 300 at the rear:

SRP pistons
Eagle crank/rods w/arp bolts
5.0 Edelbrock heads RPM though 2.02 (1.9)
Canton tall covers
Harland Sharp 1.6 stud Rockers
nitrous cam NX264HR comps cam xe270hr-114
main stud girdle
Canton 7qt pan (15620) w/ pick-up
FMS HV oil pump w/ hardened shaft
Crane lifters
FMS indexed double roller chain
Edelbrock Performer II upper/lower intake
Edelbrock 75 mm tb/spacer
TFS 1" spacer
28oz sfi billet flywheel
28oz streetdampr balancer
Ford Racing Water pump
FRPP 30lbs injectors
Pro-M 75mm 76mm mass air
Paxton fuel regulator
JLT cold air kit
Click to expand...
 

Cobra912

Active Member
May 1, 2005
1,777
11
39
Wish I was anywhere but here
Apr 12, 2008
#40
  • Apr 12, 2008
  • #40
Oh my............

I better go to my garage to make sure all my stuff is there.......
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved Question about Matt Farah’s Foxbody
  • Alldegree
  • Mar 11, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 16, 2024
Willybill32
First gear is too tall. Should I make it taller? Nitrous guys, help!
  • FastDriver
  • Dec 30, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 31, 2023
AeroCoupe
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
New to me Fox body. Looking for Rough HP and compression ratio
  • Halford4491
  • Oct 30, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2021
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?