• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

347...best carb question....

  • Thread starter Thread starter synthartist69
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2011
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 5, 2011
#1
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #1
Hey guys,

I am having a 347 built and I wanted to get some opinions on what carb to run. I bought a new Holley 750CFM vac sec but am starting to question if it will be too much for this set up. Should I have went with a 650 vac sec instead. I plan on staying under 6,500 rpm.

This will be a street/highway racer....no dragstrip. Here is the set up...

1965 mustang GT350 tribute

347 block
Ford Racing F303 Cam
Hipo manifolds...for now (headers later)
Pro Comp castings
2.02 exhaust 1.90 intake
Performer Rpm intake
3.00 rear end
T5Z 5 speed

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • user130948_pic28188_1270455708.webp
    58.9 KB · Views: 217

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 5, 2011
#2
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #2
650 would probably be better suited I'd think.
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 5, 2011
#3
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #3
blown65 said:
650 would probably be better suited I'd think.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the opinion!
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Apr 5, 2011
#4
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #4
Have you got any plans for a rear end gear change, to match the cam? In regards to the carb question, I agree, smaller usually is better. If you can return the 750 and try to get the 650, I'd say try that.
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 5, 2011
#5
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #5
Hey Woodsnake,

I am doing a t5z conversion with this 347 right now. It will have a higher 5th gear (.63) than the normal T5 (.68). Therefore this will give me a little room to go with a lower rear gear at some point. At the same time I want to keep my RPMS at 70 under 2300. Right now with the 4 speed and 3.00 they are 2600 at 70mph.
 

S-Car-Go

Member
Mar 25, 2003
332
0
16
San Jose, CA
Apr 5, 2011
#6
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #6
2600 rpms (at 70) x .63 = 1638 rpms with the new trans.

I'd go 3.55 or 3.40 at minimum
 

robbz28

Member
Sep 23, 2009
775
5
19
Epps, LA
Apr 5, 2011
#7
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #7
I agree with everyone else, 650 would be better.....but I would like to throw in there that a step to a double pumper would just be oh so fun with that 5 speed
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
Apr 5, 2011
#8
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #8
When I got my 347 I asked e engine builder to suggest a carb and they (Coast High Performance) recommended the Holley Street Avenger 670 cfm, which is what I went with. I haven't dyno tuned the car yet, but runs very strong and the vac secondaries don't need much fussing. You will love the T5 also, best upgrade to date!
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Apr 5, 2011
#9
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #9
in my 68 I have a 3.50 geared rear end, and the car feels like it needs more gear. I'm planning the upgrade to a 3.73 here in the next month or two. The lower highway RPM's are a good idea, until you have to kick into 4th every time you need to get around somebody. With that motor and trans, you might be happier with a slightly taller gear....
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 6, 2011
#10
  • Apr 6, 2011
  • #10
670 street avenger?

What about a 670 street avenger for my set up? Pros and cons....
 

robbz28

Member
Sep 23, 2009
775
5
19
Epps, LA
Apr 6, 2011
#11
  • Apr 6, 2011
  • #11
Thats a good carb....why the oddball CFM who knows, but its a good carb, and you get a quick change secondary spring kit and its less (in many cases) than a standard 650 carb. I had one in my camaro with a 400 horse 350 in it, worked great streeting around...but I stand by my original post, a double pumper is more fun
 

NMEMJCM

Member
Nov 10, 2009
83
2
6
Long Beach CA
Apr 6, 2011
#12
  • Apr 6, 2011
  • #12
I have a 347 with overdrive in my car too. I have a eddy 650 carb with 370 end gears. Perfect for freeways, and the car will still get out of its own way if need be. I have no problem goung to 6500. I prefer it over the 750 for street driving (the 750 is a bit much for the street, the car seems to run better with the 650). If your going to the track more than the street, bump er up to a 750 fwiw.
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 6, 2011
#13
  • Apr 6, 2011
  • #13
NMEMJCM said:
I have a 347 with overdrive in my car too. I have a eddy 650 carb with 370 end gears. Perfect for freeways, and the car will still get out of its own way if need be. I have no problem goung to 6500. I prefer it over the 750 for street driving (the 750 is a bit much for the street, the car seems to run better with the 650). If your going to the track more than the street, bump er up to a 750 fwiw.
Click to expand...

I have never given an Edelbrock much thought, but you now have me looking at the 650. This may be the way to go...
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 6, 2011
#14
  • Apr 6, 2011
  • #14
I really don't think with his setup a 750 would be faster at the strip anyways.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
711
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
R
Bad Vibration at 2000-3000RPM
  • Rona
  • Apr 16, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2023
85GTStangGuy
W
Advancing Timing for 100 octane fuel
  • Wellzy55
  • Oct 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 29, 2020
Wellzy55
W
I
68 289 2V Budget Build Advice
  • iaff284
  • Jan 21, 2020
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jan 21, 2020
iaff284
I
7
73 mustang blower build info needed
  • 73stang347
  • Sep 20, 2018
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2018
rbohm
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?