• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

347 intake suggestions (carb'ed)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Freemans5oh
  • Start date Start date Nov 13, 2005
F

Freemans5oh

New Member
Apr 13, 2005
4
0
0
Nov 13, 2005
#1
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #1
Hello all,

I searched and couldn't really find what I needed....so any of you carb'ed guys that can help, I would really appreciate it.
I am getting rid of all my FI stuff (TFS-R, 24lbs, cai, MSD, etc) and going with a carb. My setup consists of a 347, XE274 cam, 1.6's, Edelbrock heads, 5 speed, 3.73's....
This car is only a sunny day driver and/or strip car...

Which carb'ed intake would you suggest for this combo. I have it narrowed down to the following:
Ede Performer RPM: Not sure if it will flow enough
Torker II: I know nothing about them, other than Edelbrocks pitch
Victor Jr.: Higher RPM, but no lower...

Anybody running these that can offer pro's or con's?

Thx in advance
JOhn
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Nov 13, 2005
#2
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #2
Victor JR for the track, Performer or Performer RPM are good streetable carb intakes.
 

bufrd

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2001
159
0
0
midwest
Nov 13, 2005
#3
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #3
Edelbrock Performer RPM Dual Plane Aluminum Intake

Pro-Form Race Series 750cfm Carburetor

what i got dont take it to the strip much but i like it
 

STANGateURlilSS

Founding Member
May 2, 2002
716
0
16
USA & SANDBOX
Nov 13, 2005
#4
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #4
i woudl say if its just a strip car go victor jr but if you still do drive it a bit on the street on the weekends.. the rpm.. the torker is a old design.. and the rpm flows better then it does and keeps the low end you want..
 
F

Freemans5oh

New Member
Apr 13, 2005
4
0
0
Nov 13, 2005
#5
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #5
Thank you guys...that is the info I was looking for. I was definately concerned about the Victor on the street.

John
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Nov 13, 2005
#6
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #6
With a stroker you can get away with a Victor Jr. even for street use, unless you're running bone stock heads. GT40Ps work well on the street with a Victor Jr. Personally i wouldn't over look the Wieand Stealth, it's cheaper than an RPM intake and it outflows it both at the top and bottom of the RPM range.
 

aleborjas

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
610
0
0
Nov 14, 2005
#7
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #7
victor JR is too big for your cam run edelbrock RPM air gap (part #7521) and 750 CFM double pumper maybe proform,speed demon, holley HP and if you got money get Da vinci.......
get the air gap with wilson 4 holes spacer to improve air flow velocity!
 
F

Freemans5oh

New Member
Apr 13, 2005
4
0
0
Nov 14, 2005
#8
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #8
Thx again guys,

Do the "air gap" intakes really make that much of a difference?

John
 

timewarped1972

Member
Jun 17, 2004
642
0
16
mesa, az
Nov 14, 2005
#9
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #9
personally i have issues with the performer series manifolds for fords...i have a 65 stang, built 302 with an old school shneider 288h cam, ported iron heads with 194 160 valves, 355 gears and a c-4 auto. it had an old dual plane on it, a ported f4b, i switched to a victor jr knock off ( professional products) and i swear, i gained power everywhere.....i've had several 302 other that this and used either performers or performer rpms and not been happy with them.....maybe it's just me...only my opinion......
although i can guarantee you though, with a stick, 373's, and a 347, your not gonna be soggy on the bottom end no matter what you run..lol....note- if you have the hood clearance messing with 2 inch spacers can make a big diff with some of these manifolds too..
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Nov 14, 2005
#10
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #10
Freemans5oh said:
Thx again guys,

Do the "air gap" intakes really make that much of a difference?

John
Click to expand...


Yes. The opening does basically the same thing that the Victor Jr. intakes do, that being let air in under the intake runners to help cool the intake. This is the only reason i'd consider one over a Stealth intake, but when i was shopping it came down to RPM range and value. If you ask most hardcore carb guys they'll tell you, probably 8 out of 10 guys opt for the Stealth on street/strip cars. For you car though, i still say the Vic Jr.
 

aleborjas

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
610
0
0
Nov 14, 2005
#11
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #11
i would run air gap or professional products intakes i think is called crosswind a friend has it and he loves it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SOLD 1993 Mustang Cobra / 114K miles / Modified / Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Naja
  • Oct 4, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 26, 2025
Naja
347 Stroker Intake And Carb Suggestions
  • RNally
  • Jan 30, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 31, 2018
Davedacarpainter
T
Fox No Boost And Stumped
  • TWEECD
  • Aug 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2017
TWEECD
T
Engine Thinking About Buying A Used Engine, Need Advice
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Feb 21, 2014
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2014
84Ttop
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?