• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

351?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2fast4u770
  • Start date Start date May 28, 2019
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

2fast4u770

Active Member
Jan 16, 2011
121
12
28
May 28, 2019
#1
  • May 28, 2019
  • #1
Been looking and looking and doing some research on what motor I want to run, either a 347 or 351 and maybe stroke it. Anyone running a 351 and if so how was the swap? Do you like it over the 302 base and why? How much power can the 351 hold? Will my stock 302 wire harness work with the 351? Aren’t most parts interchangeable. Also here is block that caught my eye? Seems legit, anyone have any experience or better knowledge

351 Windsor Short Block Engine Sale, Remanufactured 351W

Our Ford 5.8 liter 351 Windsor Short Block Engine is for Sale. Better than a rebuilt 351W, this motor is completely remanufactured with upgraded parts.
spprecision.com
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,798
6,948
214
SW Houston
May 28, 2019
#2
  • May 28, 2019
  • #2
I've done couple. you can get plenty of power out of either, the only real "swap" parts you'd need are headers, an oil pan, and an A/C bracket, should you decide to keep A/C. The intakes are different, so you'd need a 351 specific intake. There's other small differences, but those are the major ones. As far as power, it depends on your goals. What are you trying to do?
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
28,012
10,636
213
polk county florida
May 28, 2019
#3
  • May 28, 2019
  • #3
Go fast, take chances!
oh and WHEELIES!
 

2fast4u770

Active Member
Jan 16, 2011
121
12
28
May 28, 2019
#4
  • May 28, 2019
  • #4
hoopty5.0 said:
I've done couple. you can get plenty of power out of either, the only real "swap" parts you'd need are headers, an oil pan, and an A/C bracket, should you decide to keep A/C. The intakes are different, so you'd need a 351 specific intake. There's other small differences, but those are the major ones. As far as power, it depends on your goals. What are you trying to do?
Click to expand...
Goals is really a weekend car that will make passes on the drag strip every couple of weekends. My rear is pretty much built for the track now. The plan is turbo with maybe a 50 shot, and around 700hp would be great. Can a 90s 351 hold that power easy?
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,798
6,948
214
SW Houston
May 28, 2019
#5
  • May 28, 2019
  • #5
Why a 50 shot on top of a turbo? If you're thinking turbo lag, you need to do a lot more research. Have you been to the turbo forums? Spend some time in the build thread section and just read. Read several threads. You need to educate yourself on the right path, otherwise you'll chase your tail around and waste money without ever having anything to show for it. Find a build that you like and mimic what they did.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
May 28, 2019
#6
  • May 28, 2019
  • #6
The link you posted doesn't really provide any info about what has been done to the block or what parts are included. I would shy away from it.

A properly aluminum headed 351 should make 500hp without trying too much. That same motor with a turbo should well exceed 700hp without the help of nitrous. My suggestion would be to mimic a build that someone else has already done. You will know the money involved, the parts involved and get to learn from their mistakes and failures.

There was a build on corral.net a few years back of a SN95 351 with a blower. I don't remember the power numbers, but it was pretty healthy.

Joe
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
May 28, 2019
#7
  • May 28, 2019
  • #7
I built my n/a 393w 2 yrs. ago an have been very happy with the performance, just a street car never on a dyno but I would guess 450-500hp.
I thought the swap was fairly straight forward nothing too difficult, if you do the work yourself you can save a bunch of $.
Deck height on the 351w block is 9.5 " so hood clearance could be an issue, imbalance is also 28oz compared to 50oz.
I purchased my 1969 block prepped from my machinist and spent a while gathering all the parts.
Fox wiring harness plugs up fine, if you're staying efi you'll need to widen the fuel rail crossover and give some thought how
you want to tune it. I tried to build mine a budget friendly as possible, off the top of my head I would say I spent $4k - $5k on the
build...the little things add up!
Here's an article for reference
http://www.mustangandfords.com/how-to/engine/m5lp-0206-mustang-351w-swap
 
Reactions: RangerJoe

2fast4u770

Active Member
Jan 16, 2011
121
12
28
May 28, 2019
#8
  • May 28, 2019
  • #8
Steel1 said:
I built my n/a 393w 2 yrs. ago an have been very happy with the performance, just a street car never on a dyno but I would guess 450-500hp.
I thought the swap was fairly straight forward nothing too difficult, if you do the work yourself you can save a bunch of $.
Deck height on the 351w block is 9.5 " so hood clearance could be an issue, imbalance is also 28oz compared to 50oz.
I purchased my 1969 block prepped from my machinist and spent a while gathering all the parts.
Fox wiring harness plugs up fine, if you're staying efi you'll need to widen the fuel rail crossover and give some thought how
you want to tune it. I tried to build mine a budget friendly as possible, off the top of my head I would say I spent $4k - $5k on the
build...the little things add up!
Here's an article for reference
http://www.mustangandfords.com/how-to/engine/m5lp-0206-mustang-351w-swap
Click to expand...

Will a 1995 351w hold up to 70
hoopty5.0 said:
Why a 50 shot on top of a turbo? If you're thinking turbo lag, you need to do a lot more research. Have you been to the turbo forums? Spend some time in the build thread section and just read. Read several threads. You need to educate yourself on the right path, otherwise you'll chase your tail around and waste money without ever having anything to show for it. Find a build that you like and mimic what they did.
Click to expand...
yea I’ll do a lot more reading into it, most of the builds I see are older blocks and not EFI. I was looking into the 1995 351w
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,798
6,948
214
SW Houston
May 28, 2019
#9
  • May 28, 2019
  • #9
2fast4u770 said:
Will a 1995 351w hold up to 70

yea I’ll do a lot more reading into it, most of the builds I see are older blocks and not EFI. I was looking into the 1995 351w
Click to expand...
Many will argue the older blocks are better. There's plenty of guys out there tickling 4 digit power with newer blocks too. I wouldn't worry about that.
 

2fast4u770

Active Member
Jan 16, 2011
121
12
28
May 29, 2019
#10
  • May 29, 2019
  • #10
hoopty5.0 said:
Many will argue the older blocks are better. There's plenty of guys out there tickling 4 digit power with newer blocks too. I wouldn't worry about that.
Click to expand...

I found a 5.8 out of a bronco for $200. Do you think that would be a starting point and block to work with; of course after I get the block machined and everything
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
May 29, 2019
#11
  • May 29, 2019
  • #11
2fast4u770 said:
I found a 5.8 out of a bronco for $200. Do you think that would be a starting point and block to work with; of course after I get the block machined and everything
Click to expand...
What year ?
 

2fast4u770

Active Member
Jan 16, 2011
121
12
28
May 29, 2019
#12
  • May 29, 2019
  • #12
Steel1 said:
What year ?
Click to expand...
1990
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
May 29, 2019
#13
  • May 29, 2019
  • #13
2fast4u770 said:
1990
Click to expand...
With that year block easiest way to use a roller cam would be to use link bar lifters.
It would be a good block to use should support 700+
I paid $1200 for my 69 block machine work included, I would imagine you would end up
about the same amount after machine work.
 

2fast4u770

Active Member
Jan 16, 2011
121
12
28
May 30, 2019
#14
  • May 30, 2019
  • #14
Steel1 said:
With that year block easiest way to use a roller cam would be to use link bar lifters.
It would be a good block to use should support 700+
I paid $1200 for my 69 block machine work included, I would imagine you would end up
about the same amount after machine work.
Click to expand...
If the motor is carbed , now easy is it to make it EFI, the only thing stock I will be reusing is literally just the block itself
 

2fast4u770

Active Member
Jan 16, 2011
121
12
28
May 30, 2019
#15
  • May 30, 2019
  • #15
So I have a choice of a few blocks
85 that is still in the truck and runs great$700 for the whole truck
79 block $400
93 block $300
73 complete the have small scratch in cylinder wall $400
 

Wolf_Fox

Member
May 26, 2019
19
3
13
California
May 30, 2019
#16
  • May 30, 2019
  • #16
I'm no expert, but what I've heard being around my uncle who builds mustangs almost exclusively (has a 67 & a 69 in the shop right now) is that a properly built 347 will out-power a 351 9/10. However, a 347 is (safely) maxed. A 351 can still be stroked at that point. What he recommends for the lighter foxbody is a 347 because of the albeit small weight savings. A 351 will also be somewhat limited by its bearings. They're bigger and will limit rpms.

HOWEVER - you CAN build a neck snapping 356W for a hefty chunk of change less than a 347.
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
May 30, 2019
#17
  • May 30, 2019
  • #17
Any will work, the 93 block may already be a roller I know it was around 93/94 when they made them.
If you're going from carbed to efi might be easier/cheaper to use something like Holley sniper or fitech.
 

2fast4u770

Active Member
Jan 16, 2011
121
12
28
May 30, 2019
#18
  • May 30, 2019
  • #18
Steel1 said:
Any will work, the 93 block may already be a roller I know it was around 93/94 when they made them.
If you're going from carbed to efi might be easier/cheaper to use something like Holley sniper or fitech.
Click to expand...
If all I am using from the engine is the block it doesn’t matter if it was a carb or EFI motor right? I can just build it as a EFI like I would any motor correct or?
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
28,012
10,636
213
polk county florida
May 30, 2019
#19
  • May 30, 2019
  • #19
Go for the roller block.
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
May 30, 2019
#20
  • May 30, 2019
  • #20
2fast4u770 said:
If all I am using from the engine is the block it doesn’t matter if it was a carb or EFI motor right? I can just build it as a EFI like I would any motor correct or?
Click to expand...
Yeah, block doesn't care how it get's fuel/air.
General karthief said:
Go for the roller block.
Click to expand...
Not sure if 93 is a roller block, I think the casting number has to start with F4TE.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
247
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
748
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
318
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
S
Looking for input on Motor choice
  • stevedjarrell
  • May 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?