• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351W 400hp??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Z06killinSBF
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Oct 26, 2008
#41
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #41
One of the mags supposedly made 400hp with a stock 5.0L (including stock cam) and a set of AFR 165s and 1.7 rockers. Take away the fancy shmancy heads and add in 49 cubic inches, and I dont see why 400hp would be so hard. A TFS stage 1 cam and a set of retro roller lifters would make for a really nice combo. Maybe a little short of 400 ponies, but still a great combo on the cheap.

Has anyone used these retro lifters? Id like to get a set, but they almost seem to cheap to be any good.
Crower 66335-16 - Crower Roller Lifters - JEGS
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 26, 2008
#42
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #42
Decurion said:
One of the mags supposedly made 400hp with a stock 5.0L (including stock cam) and a set of AFR 165s and 1.7 rockers. Take away the fancy shmancy heads and add in 49 cubic inches, and I dont see why 400hp would be so hard. A TFS stage 1 cam and a set of retro roller lifters would make for a really nice combo. Maybe a little short of 400 ponies, but still a great combo on the cheap.

Has anyone used these retro lifters? Id like to get a set, but they almost seem to cheap to be any good.
Crower 66335-16 - Crower Roller Lifters - JEGS
Click to expand...



according to the crower catalog those are for late model roller blocks. the retro-fit rollers are part number 66337-16

and here's jegs page on them

Crower 66337-16 - JEGS
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Oct 26, 2008
#43
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #43
bnickel said:
according to the crower catalog those are for late model roller blocks. the retro-fit rollers are part number 66337-16

and here's jegs page on them

Crower 66337-16 - JEGS
Click to expand...

Hmm... the page I posted says this- "...can be retrofitted for earlier-style blocks." So whats the difference, besides an additional $360?
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Oct 26, 2008
#44
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #44
Z06killinSBF said:
get a set of Windsor Jr's
Click to expand...

I was just looking at flow numbers for a whole slew of aftermarket heads compared to stock, and stock gt40s will outflow the JRs on the intake under .400" lift, which is where the valve is most of the time anyway. With porting Im sure the JRs would, or at least should, blow the gt40s away, but speaking stock for stock they suck. Plus the relocated spark plug angle may severely hamper your exhaust options.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 26, 2008
#45
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #45
Decurion said:
Hmm... the page I posted says this- "...can be retrofitted for earlier-style blocks." So whats the difference, besides an additional $360?
Click to expand...



well they can retro-fitted if you use a small base circle cam.....otherwise it's just a misprint.

i did find a set of link-bar retro roller lifters from Cat power parts for $275 though.

C.A.T.

part number LRH-302B. ignore the part where it says solid cam, they actually should have put flat tappet, not solid. i just downloaded the catalog and it is correct in the catalog.

i've heard ok things about them and really nothing negative but then again i haven't gone out searching for anyone having problems with them either. for $275, though, i just might be willing to give them a try anyway.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Oct 26, 2008
#46
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #46
Decurion said:
I was just looking at flow numbers for a whole slew of aftermarket heads compared to stock, and stock gt40s will outflow the JRs on the intake under .400" lift, which is where the valve is most of the time anyway. With porting Im sure the JRs would, or at least should, blow the gt40s away, but speaking stock for stock they suck. Plus the relocated spark plug angle may severely hamper your exhaust options.
Click to expand...
Good info. Are these the "P" heads or just the GT40?
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Oct 26, 2008
#47
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #47
I don't think you aren't getting 'support', I think you are getting some decent advice.

Again, I recommend S B F T e c h d o t c o m, all they do over there is build racing engines, and for them saving a few tenths at the quarter is better than money in the bank.

If you already have a running car, sell off the stuff you aren't going to use, SAVE some money, and build the power plant you really want.

Why do **** three or four times?
If you want aluminum heads, save and shop around. I have two pairs in my living room right now. A brand new never- even- seen a block pair of Trick Flows,( I bought new) and a set of Comp Roller rockers, and a pair of rebuilt/ported Edelbrocks,( I bought used for 1K) and a set of Lunati roller rockers for that pair of heads.
I bought the Trick Flows when I got back from Germany/Qatar in 05. We are pushing 09, and they are still in my living room.
Why? Because I don't have the means yet to pull my W out of my 69, and do teh machine work, and buy the 408 stroker kit that I want.
Most people have more time than money, and that's why when you see an "old" guy driving a new Vette, you know he's really, really enjoying the fruits of his time and labor.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Oct 26, 2008
#48
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #48
Z06killinSBF said:
Good info. Are these the "P" heads or just the GT40?
Click to expand...

I was referring to the early gt40 non-P heads, but they both flow about the same with the Ps being slightly better.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
219
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
704
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
688
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
853
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
393
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?