• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

351W heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackVert
  • Start date Start date Dec 27, 2004

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 27, 2004
#1
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #1
Is anyone running vintage 351W heads? Are they compatible with our engine blocks and intakes?

I got myself an engine building book for christmas, and it says that the vintage 351W heads provide a very good combination of low end torque and high end air flow. After a certain year (1972 I think), the 351Ws started getting the same heads they were using on the 302s, so they are no better.

- Chris
 
O

One Wicked SVT

New Member
Nov 30, 2004
91
0
0
Dec 28, 2004
#2
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #2
D8 heads are good and yes they fit, you may need 1/2 reducer washers to fit those heads on the 302.

Your intake and all will bolt up as well as the heads will bolt up to the block with no problems.
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Dec 28, 2004
#3
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #3
The best 351W heads are the C9 & D0 heads (69 & 70). There are better heads out now, the newer E7 heads will be comparable to the 351's. And yes the mid 70's 351 & 302 heads are the same. The 351 heads have larger head bolt holes.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Dec 28, 2004
#4
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #4
The Boss 302 used 351 cleveland heads. So I would assume you could use them.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 29, 2004
#5
  • Dec 29, 2004
  • #5
94CobraPace said:
The best 351W heads are the C9 & D0 heads (69 & 70). There are better heads out now, the newer E7 heads will be comparable to the 351's. And yes the mid 70's 351 & 302 heads are the same. The 351 heads have larger head bolt holes.
Click to expand...
so you are saying that my ported stock heads are similar to the vintage 351s, right? if so, then i will stop thinking about finding 351s.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 29, 2004
#6
  • Dec 29, 2004
  • #6
wytstang said:
The Boss 302 used 351 cleveland heads. So I would assume you could use them.
Click to expand...
yes, but i hear that the valves are so big that you lose torque down low. mine is a 100% daily driver, so i want the low end.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
813
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
2
Running very very rich
  • 2esoteric
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
305
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?