• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351w Power Potential?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wickedmach1
  • Start date Start date Feb 16, 2004
W

wickedmach1

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
376
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 16, 2004
#1
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #1
Is it possible to make 425 or more HP from a stock '69 351w without stroking it? If so, what combination of parts would you guys use? The car will be used on the street so low end torque will be needed. Thanks.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Feb 16, 2004
#2
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #2
AFR185/Comp 280H/750 Demon/Weiand Stealth/1 3/4 Headers with full exhaust would probably do it...
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 16, 2004
#3
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #3
pfft, 425hp is fairly easy with a stock stroke 351w. its when you approach the 500hp mark that you start having trouble
 
W

wickedmach1

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
376
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 16, 2004
#4
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #4
What would be your approach if you were to build a 425 + HP standard stroke 351w? Of course money is always an issue but I am willing to do what it takes. Please remeber that the car will be for the street, so I really don't need a high rev (RPM) engine. Thanks for the help.
 

dolfan87

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2000
1,242
0
0
Lake Havasu, AZ
Feb 16, 2004
#5
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #5
Sad But True gave you a pretty good starting point. I would do all the little friction reducing tricks. Roller cam, standard volume oil pump, roller rockers, electric fuel pump instead of mechanical, ect.ect.

Then I would make sure that bad boy flowed as much air as possible.

That is the best way to make power, and keep it streetable. Build it smart.

87
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Feb 17, 2004
#6
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #6
What do you use to cover the hole where the mechanical fuel pump used to be if you convert to lecky?
 
M

Mosse

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
229
0
0
Finland, Tampere
Feb 17, 2004
#7
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #7
"Fuelpump block off plate"

How about, if I may capture part of this thread, what about with stock heads, or cleaned up stock heads?
 
M

mp67

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
392
0
0
Texas
Feb 17, 2004
#8
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #8
Mosse said:
"Fuelpump block off plate"

How about, if I may capture part of this thread, what about with stock heads, or cleaned up stock heads?
Click to expand...

Usually, to have the work done on stock heads to achieve 425hp potential is the same money as buying a set of aluminum ones and getting a good weight savings to boot. Unless you are skilled to do the work on the stock ones yourself.
 

milner351

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
92
0
0
The Motor City
Feb 17, 2004
#9
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #9
I've done some of this and decided to go stroker.
First and foremost, HEADS.
I have twisted wedge, but I wouldn't buy them again because the relocated valves create piston problems with bigger cams.
I'd say for a street engine AFR185 is the way to go.
Also, if going carbureted, make sure you pick an intake that is a dual plane / modified dual plane set up, like the edlebrock rpm air gap for example, or at least a performer rpm.
I'd make sure you balance the combination, and make sure you go with a good harmonic balancer and flywheel / flexplate, and have them balanced with the crank.
USE ARP ROD BOLTS!
Get a desktop dyno program and play around until you find something you like.
You might also talk to the guys at REED cams, tell them your goals, and get their recomendations.
 

69'Elvira

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
438
0
0
Plano, Texas
Feb 17, 2004
#10
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #10
wickedmach1 said:
Is it possible to make 425 or more HP from a stock '69 351w without stroking it? If so, what combination of parts would you guys use? The car will be used on the street so low end torque will be needed. Thanks.
Click to expand...

It's pretty easy, look at my setup and put comp 280H in it and you have 450hp right in.
My cam is standart, not even mild.
 
W

wickedmach1

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
376
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 17, 2004
#11
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #11
What is the difference between Comp Cams 280H and the XE268H? Are they similiar?
 
W

wickedmach1

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
376
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 18, 2004
#12
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #12
When you guys say to use the Comp Cams 280H, is that for a '69 351w engine? Comp Cams has the retro-fit camshafts for engines that did not come as a roller from the factory. Do I need one of these retro-fits? What parts will I need for the roller conversion? After I do the roller conversion, can I use the 280H? I guess I don't understand the retro=fit camshafts. Please help.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 18, 2004
#13
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #13
there are a couple ways to do the retro-fit if you go to a roller cam.
1) you can get a reduced base circle cam and use stock roller lifters
2) use a standard cam and get retro fit lifters

the reason you would have do this is because the roller lifter's oiling hole is raised in the bore to compensate for the roller on the end of the lifter, which the OEM's fixed by using a redesigned block with taller lifter bores which is actually the best way to go, but if you go the retro-fit route either will work, but there are drawbacks to both options. with the small base circle cam the diamater of the cam is smaller so it is inherently not as strong as a standard base circle cam. with the retro-fit lifters you could compromise the oiling capability of the engine as the oil holes are not where they should be and i believe you are limited on the lift you can use because you could have a problem exposing the oil hole in the lifter body thereby losing oil pressure to lifter causing it to collapse
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 19, 2004
#14
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #14
I wont claim the "plus" in your 425+ figure. But I should get 420-425 from my stock stroke 351W. Any quality heads with a 2.02/1.61 valve setup should get there with the 278-282 cam that ya'll are mentioning. I am using a mech fuel pump since I am carbed, but I am saving even more power with an electric water pump.
 

SLIGHTLY_INSANE

Founding Member
Oct 29, 2001
1,532
0
36
SNOQUALMIE PASS
Feb 19, 2004
#15
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #15
what about throwing the paxton novi 1200 carb kit onto it.
 

69stanger

Founding Member
Oct 20, 2002
102
0
0
CA
Feb 19, 2004
#16
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #16
wickedmach1 said:
Is it possible to make 425 or more HP from a stock '69 351w without stroking it? If so, what combination of parts would you guys use? The car will be used on the street so low end torque will be needed. Thanks.
Click to expand...

do you mean with stock pistons?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
49
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
P
Repeated P2004 DTC trouble code with no apparent symptoms
  • poehitman
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
162
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Mar 12, 2026
poehitman
P
Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
92
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?