• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351w questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter my67stang
  • Start date Start date Aug 27, 2005
M

my67stang

New Member
Aug 22, 2005
7
0
0
Aug 27, 2005
#1
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • #1
HI. I am thinking about putting a 351w into m '67 mustang coupe since it is an easy swap with the stock 289. Anyway the guy I am buying it from says that the engine proabably has around 400 horsepower. I was wondering what mods I need to do to the rest of the car to handle that power. Can the stock c4 handle it? Do I need to upgrade to a 9" rear end. I am already planning on upgrading to front disc brakes. Anyway if you have an opinion let me hear it. Thanks
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Aug 27, 2005
#2
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • #2
If the engine is a legit 400 hp engine and you plan on driving it aggressively a 9" would be recomended. I don't think a used stock C-4 would hold up under that much power. A C4 can be rebuilt to handle more power than that. You could run the C4 until you trash it and then rebuild it or rebuild it right away. Your choice.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 28, 2005
#3
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #3
if you are not going to use slicks, then the stock driveline, as long as it is for the 289, can handle the power, though durability will be compromised. when the parts break, you can upgrade them as you replace them.
 
M

Mr_Merciless

New Member
Aug 29, 2005
12
0
0
Aug 29, 2005
#4
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #4
Is this a dynoed 400HP? Or a bench talk 400 HP? Your stock drivetrain will handle this just fine unless your doing neutral drops.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Aug 30, 2005
#5
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #5
Full throttle shifts lasted a little while for me on an AAMCO rebuild. I got the tranny with about 5k mile son it for 200 bucks. Figured what the hell. Lasted about 2 years. And a little nitrous.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Aug 30, 2005
#6
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #6
The little C4 is stronger than most folks give it credit for, and for the price of a B&M/TCI built AOD you can hold 700+hp with a C4.

But the missing gear really sucks for driving the public roads.
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Aug 30, 2005
#7
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #7
Well, my first thought is 9 times out of 10, when someone "says" that they have 400 horsepower..........it is usually 300............get the specs on the cam, heads, etc, first before you start budgeting money towards upgrades.........otherwise just put in a shift kit and you'll probably be fine............

Chris Barton


my67stang said:
HI. I am thinking about putting a 351w into m '67 mustang coupe since it is an easy swap with the stock 289. Anyway the guy I am buying it from says that the engine proabably has around 400 horsepower. I was wondering what mods I need to do to the rest of the car to handle that power. Can the stock c4 handle it? Do I need to upgrade to a 9" rear end. I am already planning on upgrading to front disc brakes. Anyway if you have an opinion let me hear it. Thanks
Click to expand...
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Aug 30, 2005
#8
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #8
Cbarton said:
Well, my first thought is 9 times out of 10, when someone "says" that they have 400 horsepower..........it is usually 300
Click to expand...
9 out of 10? Really? I guess you've been around a lot of younger enthusiasts then

On a more serious note, when I hear the 400hp number and find they have a N/A-289/302 I am also skeptical, but for folks with the big windsors I am less so, 400 is pretty easy and cheap to get even without stroking the 351W. When you get to FE/C/385 owners it is even easier. But when the claim is made and they know nothing about the specs as you mentioned my skepticism meter goes off too.
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Aug 30, 2005
#9
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #9
Yeah, I agree.........I am 42 years old, so I go back to the day when 400 hp was the 'Magic" number. EVERYBODY said their hot rod had 400 hp. Of course then when dynos became readily available.........most of those guys couldn't back it up. You are right about the 289/302's tho....I have seen so many examples of someone who builds a 302 with intake, allum heads, hot cam and intake carb only to be disapointed with sub 300hp on the dyno........SOUNDS like 400hp tho..........


Chris


Edbert said:
9 out of 10? Really? I guess you've been around a lot of younger enthusiasts then

On a more serious note, when I hear the 400hp number and find they have a N/A-289/302 I am also skeptical, but for folks with the big windsors I am less so, 400 is pretty easy and cheap to get even without stroking the 351W. When you get to FE/C/385 owners it is even easier. But when the claim is made and they know nothing about the specs as you mentioned my skepticism meter goes off too.
Click to expand...
 
B

babaker

New Member
Apr 25, 2005
21
0
0
Monroe, WA
Aug 30, 2005
#10
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #10
Other things

Besides tranny, and rear. If you are going to flog that motor you'll want traction bars of some kind, as well as subframe connectors, better shocks, better tires.

As far as the trans goes, you'd be surprised how much the stock C4 will handle, but you want to make sure and get the specs for the Cam, Intake and heads so that you can properly size the Tourque convertor. Depending on where and how the tourque curve looks will determine the stall speed of the convertor.
You don't have to change the convertor at that HP level, but it make for a much better driver.

I'm still breaking in my new 351w that I built for my 66. I put a TCI street fighter c4 in with a Jegs 2500 stall convertor. It also has CE traction bars and subframe connectors. I can cruise around just fine, even idle at a light, and when I nail it, it chirps the tires shifting in to 2nd, and maybe in third but by then I going to friggin fast to pay attention to whether the tires chirp or not.

Brent
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
What's it Worth? Considering Selling '82 Fairmont Futura Body Shell
  • DonMay63
  • Apr 5, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
0
Views
96
What is it Worth?!?!? Apr 5, 2026
DonMay63
D
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
D
351w swap shifter is not lining up
  • duckman0926
  • Aug 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
192
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 7, 2025
limp
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
603
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
G
1991 GT 5.0 running hot
  • gvanginkel403
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
154
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 2, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?