• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

3in exhaust worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95conv5.0
  • Start date Start date Jan 15, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
9

95conv5.0

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
184
0
0
Jan 15, 2006
#1
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #1
im building a 347 stroker with victor jr heads, prolly around 420rwhp maybe more, should i just go with 2.5 or should i go ahead and go with 3in?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jan 15, 2006
#2
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #2
3" if you need to buy a new exhaust.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Jan 15, 2006
#3
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #3
do you think a stroker alone will make 450hp na?
 

boostaddict5_0

New Member
Oct 24, 2003
37
0
0
Jan 15, 2006
#4
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #4
Sounds about right 480hp flywheel
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jan 15, 2006
#5
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #5
GreenMustangGt said:
do you think a stroker alone will make 450hp na?
Click to expand...


He made 445rwhp. http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2005/02/YellowFever/index.php Its easy with the right parts!
 
9

95conv5.0

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
184
0
0
Jan 15, 2006
#6
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #6
yes and thats exactly what i bought just about everything he has on his car, shows those no believers it can be done
 
9

95conv5.0

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
184
0
0
Jan 15, 2006
#7
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #7
GreenMustangGt said:
do you think a stroker alone will make 450hp na?
Click to expand...
dont be a sore looser just because your twin turbo monster makes about the same hp as a h/c/i stock block 302 "331 HP"
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 15, 2006
#8
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #8
With those parts a 3 inch exhaust is worth it. I have one on mine.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Jan 16, 2006
#9
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #9
95conv5.0 said:
dont be a sore looser just because your twin turbo monster makes about the same hp as a h/c/i stock block 302 "331 HP"
Click to expand...

He's running 5 psi.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jan 16, 2006
#10
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #10
95conv5.0 said:
dont be a sore looser just because your twin turbo monster makes about the same hp as a h/c/i stock block 302 "331 HP"
Click to expand...

Yea just like the guy said above, hes only at 5psi. Wait till he ups the boost...you wont be talking **** then.

I'd wonder what his dyno graph looks like. Others would comment about his lack of power steering and a/c too lol. Its definately a phenominal combo that doesnt get put together every time and work that well. Thus why most people think that power level isnt possible.
 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
1,249
3
39
EVERETT,PA
Jan 16, 2006
#11
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #11
i'm really not sure on the size thing. i have seen a lot of guys run 10's with 2 1/2 inch exhaust. the 3 inch will hurt you down low, but help up top , its all a trade off
 
9

95conv5.0

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
184
0
0
Jan 16, 2006
#12
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #12
Black Stampede said:
He's running 5 psi.
Click to expand...
true, but he also told me i couldnt make 420rwhp with a 347 its been done millions of times,
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jan 16, 2006
#13
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #13
95conv5.0 said:
true, but he also told me i couldnt make 420rwhp with a 347 its been done millions of times,
Click to expand...


I dont know if its been done a million times. I wouldnt say its the "regular" for a stroker to make that much power...you would come across many more 347's under 400rwhp than you would with over 400rwhp. Thus i think the reason for his response.

Has his dyno sheet ever been posted? I would like to see what it looks like.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Jan 16, 2006
#14
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #14
95conv5.0 said:
dont be a sore looser just because your twin turbo monster makes about the same hp as a h/c/i stock block 302 "331 HP"
Click to expand...

Im not a sore loser.....Just like said above its not everyday that a stroker motor makes that kind of power...my buddy's 347 with afr85's makes about the same as my car.

Also, there is no need to knock anyone's car on here...I'de like to see you make power numbers like my car can for under $1800.
 

94Blue302GT

Member
Oct 20, 2003
704
3
19
Chicago
Jan 16, 2006
#15
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #15
Turbo, 3" is great. If you're goin N/A, 2 3/4 would be perfect.... uhhh, good luck with that.
lol
 

bill302

Active Member
Nov 2, 2005
2,131
1
46
alabama,gadsden
Jan 16, 2006
#16
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #16
VibrantRedGT said:
With those parts a 3 inch exhaust is worth it. I have one on mine.
Click to expand...

Mr. VibrantRedGT do you have a tail pipe or is it dumped before axles because i thought anything over 2.5 in. causes problems clearing axle (rattle problems) and even a 2.5 in tail pipe rattles at axle area unless you buy a good brand 2.5 in tail pipe. reason asking is, if a 3 in exhaust is run and a tail pipe is added it will probably have to be a 2.5 in which will cost about $160-$300
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 16, 2006
#17
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #17
My exhaust is a full 3 inch system (collector to tips). No rattles that I've heard. Its not an easy exhaust system to install though. It took 3 people a few hours to get everything straight.





As soon as photobucket comes back up I'll post pics of the exhaust system off the car.
 

Attachments

  • MustangTailPipes.webp
    34.9 KB · Views: 154
  • MustangRear.webp
    30.3 KB · Views: 142

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 16, 2006
#18
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #18
Photobucket back up.

MAC full 3 inch.





 

Attachments

  • headers.webp
    58 KB · Views: 129
  • 3inchprochamber.webp
    48.9 KB · Views: 133
  • 3catback.webp
    50.1 KB · Views: 130

95cobraguy

Member
Dec 23, 2005
637
11
19
Concord, NC by way of LI, NY
Jan 16, 2006
#19
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #19
how does that mac cat back sound? i assume those headers are ceramic. i'm waiting to get mine back from a local guy here, hopefully they look as good as that.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 16, 2006
#20
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #20
The ceramic is really nice. Plus I installed them with the motor out and tubular k member which means they don't have a single sratch on them from a normal installation. One scratch on ceramic is painfull on the eyes.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Exhaust set up
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
526
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2025
AeroCoupe
C
347 advice
  • CRonaldo773
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
268
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
2000xp8
3
393W Stroker with Boost - Need Spark Plug Recommendations
  • 387lx
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
263
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2026
HotFox
Fox Help
  • 93fox85
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2026
Noobz347
R
Engine Evap and charcoal cannister leak
  • ryan1994stang
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
406
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?