• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

4 Point Seat Belt without Harness Bar?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scudly
  • Start date Start date Sep 29, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Jan 10, 2010
#21
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #21


 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 10, 2010
#22
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #22
gonzothegreat said:


Click to expand...



yes you're correct but those belts aren't designed to bolt into the factory mounting points, the Corbeau's i posted are designed to use the factory 3-point mounting locations.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jan 10, 2010
#23
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #23
Cobra5.0Jeep said:
Are those for Classic Mustangs that are only lap belts? i don't have a 3rd point...
Click to expand...

It's a simple matter to add the overhead anchor point in 64-67 Mustangs, and of course 68-73 had them from the factory. A skilled shop knowlegeable in Mustangs can add the overhead anchor without destroying your headliner, too.
Then you can easily add 3-point belts, and keep your face out of the steering wheel.
 

Cobra5.0Jeep

Member
Nov 4, 2005
159
0
17
Grass Valley, CA
Jan 11, 2010
#24
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #24
2+2GT said:
It's a simple matter to add the overhead anchor point in 64-67 Mustangs, and of course 68-73 had them from the factory. A skilled shop knowlegeable in Mustangs can add the overhead anchor without destroying your headliner, too.
Then you can easily add 3-point belts, and keep your face out of the steering wheel.
Click to expand...

Mine is a 68 and i didn't have a 3rd point on the headliner area
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jan 11, 2010
#25
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #25
Cobra5.0Jeep said:
Mine is a 68 and i didn't have a 3rd point on the headliner area
Click to expand...

Yes you do, federal law mandated it. Someone has covered it up. No 68 could be manufactured without a shoulder belt. However, shoulder belts were new in 68, and Ford basically used two seat belts, meaning you would have two buckles bolted to the trans tunnel for each front seat. Many "creative" things have been done over time to this oddball setup.
 

Cobra5.0Jeep

Member
Nov 4, 2005
159
0
17
Grass Valley, CA
Jan 11, 2010
#26
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #26
2+2GT said:
Yes you do, federal law mandated it. Someone has covered it up. No 68 could be manufactured without a shoulder belt. However, shoulder belts were new in 68, and Ford basically used two seat belts, meaning you would have two buckles bolted to the trans tunnel for each front seat. Many "creative" things have been done over time to this oddball setup.
Click to expand...

My 68 Must be a beginning of the year car cause i just looked at the pictures of the car torn down and theres no holes anywhere for a belt to bolt down to along the headliner and i remember when i got the car the interior was complete and there was no 3rd point seatbelt.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Jan 11, 2010
#27
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #27
you brought this back to life after like 2.5 months of no posts. :|. but the fact is no rollbar/midbar/harness bar broken back.. i think i could live with a horrible accident with a big scar on my face rather than possibly never walking again.
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jan 11, 2010
#28
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #28
I have 4 point belts now and would go with 3 point for street set up. 4 point belts really need a 5th crotch belt to work properly. if you pull the shoulder belts tight, it pulles the lap belt up on your stomach. The crotch belt is needed to prevent this. Unless you wear the belts so tight that they are unfortable for a street cruise, they are not as good as a 3 point.
 

Cobra5.0Jeep

Member
Nov 4, 2005
159
0
17
Grass Valley, CA
Jan 12, 2010
#29
  • Jan 12, 2010
  • #29
i think i might just stick with lap belts.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Jan 12, 2010
#30
  • Jan 12, 2010
  • #30
you don't need to mount the 3rd point on the roof, there are tons of kits that use the door jamb to secure a third point like the picture 6stang7 posted on the first page.
 

atomicpunk

Member
May 15, 2005
80
0
6
Rocky Mountains
Jan 18, 2010
#31
  • Jan 18, 2010
  • #31
rebel65 said:
you brought this back to life after like 2.5 months of no posts. :|. but the fact is no rollbar/midbar/harness bar broken back.. i think i could live with a horrible accident with a big scar on my face rather than possibly never walking again.
Click to expand...

That's why I ultimately decided to stick with 3 points ... sounds like the best compromise by far between implanting your skull into the wheel and needing to build out a roll cage and harness bar to prevent your back from being crushed with anything else ...
 

kylehamilton79

Member
Feb 2, 2009
66
0
6
Lubbock, TX
Jan 18, 2010
#32
  • Jan 18, 2010
  • #32
I was watching Hot Rod TV the other day and Kenny Wayne Sheppard was building a '72 Charger and he put Chrysler Sebring Convertible seats in it with the built-in seat belts at the top of the seat. Would this work in a classic if you could get the seat mounted to the floor properly? I know my '03 Chevy truck has the built-in seat belts too, and they have worked good so far for me.
 
S

suki243

Member
Dec 19, 2006
662
0
19
Southern California
Jan 21, 2010
#33
  • Jan 21, 2010
  • #33
I was watching Hot Rod TV the other day and Kenny Wayne Sheppard was building a '72 Charger and he put Chrysler Sebring Convertible seats in it with the built-in seat belts at the top of the seat. Would this work in a classic if you could get the seat mounted to the floor properly? I know my '03 Chevy truck has the built-in seat belts too, and they have worked good so far for me.
Click to expand...

I believe it's been done. You'd have to search around in the myriad 3 pt belt threads and you'll find it.
 
M

MitchGT

Member
Apr 1, 2005
204
0
17
Feb 5, 2010
#34
  • Feb 5, 2010
  • #34
I think having the mounting points on the floor behind the seat would only be dangerous if the rear of the seat is lower than your shoulders ( the stock seats would certainly have that problem). if the back of the seat is higher than your shoulders, then the belts would be compressing the seat, not your back. I have a 2008 mustang with leather seats, and I love them. I might look into seeing if they would fit in my 68.
 

70vert

New Member
Dec 31, 2004
722
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Feb 5, 2010
#35
  • Feb 5, 2010
  • #35
That behind-rear-seat/wheelhouse-and-trans-tunnel mount has me thinking

Gonzo,
Thanks! For a convertible, those look interesting. The behind-the-rear-seats mounts, I mean, for a harness. They straps could be tucked nicely out of the way . . it would help keep from having to do a crossbar high up behind the rear seat where the convertible top folds . . and be a lot safer than 40 year old lap belts. I might end up doing that. It's either that, or custom-make a removable, bolt-in roll cage for those times when I don't trust my fellow drivers or want to hit the drag strip.

gonzothegreat said:


Click to expand...
 

Cobra5.0Jeep

Member
Nov 4, 2005
159
0
17
Grass Valley, CA
Feb 8, 2010
#36
  • Feb 8, 2010
  • #36
Hey anyone know where i can get Shelby style harnesses that came in the gt350s and gt500s that goes to the rollbar without the cross bar?
 
S

Scudly

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
168
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 8, 2010
#37
  • Feb 8, 2010
  • #37
I ended up doing 3 point belts, after talking to a lot of people I realized how dangerous it really was. I'll get a cage at some point if I do 4 points
 

Cobra5.0Jeep

Member
Nov 4, 2005
159
0
17
Grass Valley, CA
Feb 9, 2010
#38
  • Feb 9, 2010
  • #38
Thats good i don't have any seatbelt and the only ones i can install are lap belts and i don't want those so i would like to get the ones Shelby put in the GT350s/GT500s that bolted or mounted to the roll bar above your head.
 
N

N/A 2 valve

New Member
Oct 30, 2017
6
0
1
Nov 16, 2017
#39
  • Nov 16, 2017
  • #39
classic boost said:
4pts won't work (except for show) with out a harness bar. where would the the shoulder straps anchor to?
Click to expand...
the shoulder straps anchor to the rear seat anchor points jdm cars do this sometimes but the straps are supposed to go through the racing seat shoulder holes
 
N

N/A 2 valve

New Member
Oct 30, 2017
6
0
1
Nov 16, 2017
#40
  • Nov 16, 2017
  • #40
N/A 2 valve said:
the shoulder straps anchor to the rear seat anchor points jdm cars do this sometimes but the straps are supposed to go through the racing seat shoulder holes
Click to expand...
some say not to cuz it can cause submarine effect in a crash and have more downward pressure on neck vertabrae region the shoulder strap harness point should be close to shoulder height or higher ive read makes sense just something to think about takata website had some info on it once
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine Belt routing with supercharger and smog/ac/ps delete
  • Steve6482
  • Jul 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
50
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 15, 2026
Steve6482
S
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
171
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
414
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
91 Convertible Light bar
  • Blueinfan
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2024
foxbodybill89
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?