• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

429 in a 1967???

  • Thread starter Thread starter EL1NOR
  • Start date Start date Oct 31, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Nov 1, 2004
#21
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #21
MDJAY:

Sadly I don't think I will complete the 4.6 dohc and 6 speed I have gotten crazy offers on the stuff that I have ready for it that it is financially good for me to sell it and drop in this 393 in it.
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Nov 1, 2004
#22
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #22
Jay: You bring up a good point about the weight, it is heavy, but for a cruiser it is fine and it is hella fast in a straight line. Eventually I want to try it ona road course or autocross. And yes, it is real quick with that much torque. Also, everyone has small block stuff, so cars with BB are rare and a sight to behold.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Nov 2, 2004
#23
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #23
Fos bummer but I guess you gotta do watcha gotta do. I wanted someone to give me some pointers next year when I get into my dohc project vert.

67 the FE's are getting more common, but there aren't many with the 429, 460 motors. FR has got a 514 crate motor based on the 460 that's suppose to be a monster.
 

351LX

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
1,007
0
0
Regina, Saskatchewan
Nov 2, 2004
#24
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #24
I noticed an ad on the Ford 429-460 forum for some mounts and headers if you are interested http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=267360&messageid=1099278199&lp=1099278199
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Nov 2, 2004
#25
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #25
Jay; I agree, there are more FE engines out there these days. When my Dad and I built the 429 a few years ago it was impossible to find an FE. Also, I don't think the Torque vs HP numbers are that far off if you compare to other FE and 385 dyno charts. Big bocks have a tendancy to make a lot more torque than stroked small blocks of equivalent displacment. But all that aside...a stroked 427W is probably a better choice for weight, fitment and accessability for engine work. However, when I open the hood people come from all around to look at the beast under the hood....and the power is amazing.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
541
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Tuesday at 2:38 PM
joeybuddy96
J
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
304
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
F
T5 transmission questions
  • Forddestroyer96
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
205
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 27, 2025
Forddestroyer96
F
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
181
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
152
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?