• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

460 and handling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter undercnstrction
  • Start date Start date Feb 2, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
U

undercnstrction

New Member
Nov 10, 2009
312
0
0
Feb 2, 2010
#1
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #1
i think i'm retarded because i'm sure there are many posts on here regarding the use of big blocks in fox body mustangs. but when i put in 460 or big block i can't come up with anything.

are any of you guys running big block mustangs for other than drag racing? if so, what is the handling like? i realize they are HEAVY, but is it possible to still have a good handling car with that much motor in the nose??? other than moving the battery to the back, how else can some weight be transferred to the rear?
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Feb 2, 2010
#2
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #2
460 is teh suck for handling.

but i'm not speaking from experience.. i could be wrong...

but i just don't see how it could handle well.
 

rpk

New Member
May 18, 2008
42
0
0
Belle River, Ont
Feb 2, 2010
#3
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #3
had one in my 78 Fairmont. It was street only,so I didn't care,but it handled OK. Thinking of putting one in my 90 coupe, or a 351W(different thread). With aluminum heads and intake weight comes down to a stock 351W. Again if it's a street car, I don't care.
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Feb 2, 2010
#4
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #4
A 351 would be totally different than 460.
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
Feb 2, 2010
#5
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #5
your better bet if you want big cubes is to build a 351 thats bored and stroked to a 408 or 427. a 460 in a fox is a lot of work and even more weight
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Feb 2, 2010
#6
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #6
Is there a "best" 351 to get?
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Feb 2, 2010
#7
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #7
fiveohwblow said:
Is there a "best" 351 to get?
Click to expand...

69-70 have the strongest blocks and deck height of 9.48" & more desirable of the blocks..71-74's are also very good choices and very strong 351's but with a deck height of 9.50".

IMHO keep any stock block 351w below 650fwhp and it will be fine.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Feb 2, 2010
#8
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #8
They make motor mounts for a 460 to go into a fox. They aren't too expensive. But like above said, a 351W with a blower or N20 would be better.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Feb 2, 2010
#9
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #9
They make motor mounts for a 460 to go into a fox. They aren't too expensive. But like above said, a 351W with a blower or N20 would be better.
 

Jaym14

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
296
1
0
Long Island, N.Y.
Feb 2, 2010
#10
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #10
a 460 in a Fox is awesome for drag racing but if you care anything about carving corners then its not a good choice. The weight distribution on a stock V8 fox is horrible to begin with.. then add an extra 200lbs to the nose with a stock iron headed 460 and its that much worse. Best bet is to build a nice 393/408 stroker and call it a day... best of both worlds IMO..
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Feb 2, 2010
#11
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #11
greensvt21 said:
69-70 have the strongest blocks and deck height of 9.48" & more desirable of the blocks..71-74's are also very good choices and very strong 351's but with a deck height of 9.50".

IMHO keep any stock block 351w below 650fwhp and it will be fine.
Click to expand...

Thanks!
 
U

undercnstrction

New Member
Nov 10, 2009
312
0
0
Feb 2, 2010
#12
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #12
what transmissions would be able to hook up to the 460? could i still use a tremec 5-speed or would i need to switch to a something else? i'd like to stick with a manual?

the reason the big block came up is that i might have the chance to get into a nice 460 for a very good price. the motor is reportedly putting out 480hp as is. can you guys direct me to any good writeups for this type of swap?

all of the input is much appreciated....as always...
 

rpk

New Member
May 18, 2008
42
0
0
Belle River, Ont
Feb 2, 2010
#13
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • #13
460 in a Fox Body Mustang - 460 Ford Forum

this site has lots of info
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Feb 3, 2010
#14
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #14
uhm you want to up the nose weight of a fox by 250lbs+ and still think you're gonna have handeling ability? the engine is longer so figure the added dressed weight will be pucshed even further forward on the car, plus good luck getting got acerman and anti dive with all that extra weight and modded k member to get that bitch to fit, if you're looking for big power and handling then an aluminum 427 is what you're gonna want, fully dressed weight would be less than a 302 and make 3 times the power, but hey just IMO i dont carve much
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Feb 3, 2010
#15
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #15
there is a member here by the name of xplodinggopher or exploding gopher, anyway something like that. He has a very well done 460 swap. He hasnt been active for a while, but look him up and send him a pm.
 

faststang90

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2007
522
16
49
baytown texas
Feb 3, 2010
#16
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #16
if u are wanting the car to handle i would not do a bbf in it. i have a 93 coupe
i was doing a bbf and a turbo just for drag racing. my car with out a motor or tranny is only 1860 pounds. so the bbf would not be a problem
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Feb 3, 2010
#17
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #17
i don't even know what that means ^^^

wtf?
 
U

undercnstrction

New Member
Nov 10, 2009
312
0
0
Feb 3, 2010
#18
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #18
Shaolin Crane said:
uhm you want to up the nose weight of a fox by 250lbs+ and still think you're gonna have handeling ability? the engine is longer so figure the added dressed weight will be pucshed even further forward on the car, plus good luck getting got acerman and anti dive with all that extra weight and modded k member to get that bitch to fit, if you're looking for big power and handling then an aluminum 427 is what you're gonna want, fully dressed weight would be less than a 302 and make 3 times the power, but hey just IMO i dont carve much
Click to expand...

i was wondering if you were going to post on this thread, and if so, just how bad the "flame" would be for even thinking about a 460

the ONLY reason i considered this option was because a good opportunity came up for a good motor at a good price. but i talked with a guy at MM last night and after i got him to stop laughing he finally said...."oh we could definitely get it to handle. BUT, the car would weigh 4000lbs when it was done. because of the extra weight in the front, we'd actually have to add lead weights to the back of the car to get the balance put back to where it needs to be. the simple answer is to use a different motor"

so to make a long story short, i will NOT be using this motor.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Feb 3, 2010
#19
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #19
undercnstrction said:
i was wondering if you were going to post on this thread, and if so, just how bad the "flame" would be for even thinking about a 460

the ONLY reason i considered this option was because a good opportunity came up for a good motor at a good price. but i talked with a guy at MM last night and after i got him to stop laughing he finally said...."oh we could definitely get it to handle. BUT, the car would weigh 4000lbs when it was done. because of the extra weight in the front, we'd actually have to add lead weights to the back of the car to get the balance put back to where it needs to be. the simple answer is to use a different motor"

so to make a long story short, i will NOT be using this motor.
Click to expand...
4,000 lbs........wait, like the GT500, Terminator, Auto pervertible 05+.....
 
U

undercnstrction

New Member
Nov 10, 2009
312
0
0
Feb 3, 2010
#20
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #20
fiveohwblow said:
4,000 lbs........wait, like the GT500, Terminator, Auto pervertible 05+.....
Click to expand...

that's the same reaction i had! looks like it's back to the world of small blocks worst part is, just by dropping that motor in, i'd be sitting on 500hp (it's not a complete stocker 460 ). that's alright, i'll trade some HP for the ability to actually turn the car
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
1984 roller….. need advice!!!
  • Fivepointeasy84
  • Dec 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
153
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
481
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Big Posi and Neg wire from Starter to Battery and Alt wires..........
  • from6to8
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
192
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
454
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?