• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

4800-5300 = brick wall

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ike83
  • Start date Start date Jun 18, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#1
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #1
My car flows GREAT down low as well as all the way through the mid range rpms, but I'm trying to pinpoint why my car seems to lose horsepower just before redline.

Is this caused by my stock and unported lower intake, or are my stock heads to blame?

Keep in mind my heads ARE ported and polished, and my UPPER manifold is polished as well, not to mention I have the Competition camshaft to go along with the package, but where EXACTLY is the problem here?

I'm thinking about going with the Trickflow heads and intake, but I was just wondering if I could get by with just going to a junkyard and pulling off an Explorer intake.

Basically my question is:

Should I be more concerned with a bigger (ported lower) intake? Or should I be more concerned with getting better heads? I've always heard the ported heads are good enough, but are they what's causing my high rpm bottleneck? Or is it my stock intake? Which one is more important?
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jun 18, 2007
#2
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #2
Your stock intake...especially the lower is the biggest culprit. The stock intake is horrible and falls off dramatically after 4500 Rpm. The heads also have the same breathing problems..and also cut out at around 4500. It really depends what kind of port work was done to the heads. Bigger valves, bowl work, and a good valve job? or just gasket matching and port massaging? An explorer intake will help...but i can attest that they too will cut out at about 5000-5400 rpm. My combo seems to run out of breathe right at 5500 rpms....so i shift just below that...approx 5300.
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
Jun 18, 2007
#3
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #3
stock intake,pul it and put the explorer intakeon,mine seems to flow right up to 5500rpm with the stock heads and cam.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#4
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #4
grey5.0beast said:
stock intake,pul it and put the explorer intakeon,mine seems to flow right up to 5500rpm with the stock heads and cam.
Click to expand...

So the intake (lower) is probably the culprit? Good to know, b/c I don't want to get TOO much more fancy with the engine upgrades. I'm looking more into a new WC T5 transmission and hella suspension upgrades due to my stock suspension being almost non-existent at this point.

I DO know that the guy I bought the car from did a valve job, but I'm not really sure what all that entailed. And obviously he ported and polished the heads as well.

I guess I will go with the explorer intake and have one of my buddies match port the lower manifold, 'cause I'm sure that hasn't been done to the stock intake I'm currently running.

Now I know the 5.0 isn't the best highway runner, but MAN I hope this new intake will free up a few more hp in the highest rpms! That's really all I need at this point.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Jun 18, 2007
#5
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #5
I didn't see where you said what valve springs you have. Sounds like maybe a little valve float. Stock springs do not like to go above 5000rpm with a non stock cam in the car.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#6
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #6
2000xp8 said:
I didn't see where you said what valve springs you have. Sounds like maybe a little valve float. Stock springs do not like to go above 5000rpm with a non stock cam in the car.
Click to expand...

Ah hah! Good question. I know for a fact that the springs I'm running are completely stock. Would I have to change the rocker arms if I put different springs in, or can I keep the stock rockers?
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jun 18, 2007
#7
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #7
you could keep the stock rockers...but they are stamped steel non-roller rockers. Get a nice set of roller rockers to add a little more lift to the cam and decrease frictional losses. Rockers combined with a nice set of springs and an explorer intake and throttle body would make a real nice improvement to your car. You would probably pick up close to 25 hp with those additions...Gas mileage would also improve noticeably. good luck.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#8
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #8
ninety15.0 said:
you could keep the stock rockers...but they are stamped steel non-roller rockers. Get a nice set of roller rockers to add a little more lift to the cam and decrease frictional losses. Rockers combined with a nice set of springs and an explorer intake and throttle body would make a real nice improvement to your car. You would probably pick up close to 25 hp with those additions...Gas mileage would also improve noticeably. good luck.
Click to expand...

I already have the throttle body, but what brand rockers/springs should I be looking to get? Do I have to match them up with my cam? B/c I don't know the exact cam lift/duration I'm working with being as I didn't put the camshaft in the car, I bought it as is.

So, what type of rockers/springs am I looking for here?
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jun 18, 2007
#9
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #9
I'm running Comp Cams springs that are good to .550" lift i believe. They are dual coil springs with a damper. I'm also running the Comp Cams Pro Magnum 1.6 roller rockers. They are a real nice piece...i paid more than i wanted for rockers...actually my whole valvetrain, but i figured i would rather pay more up front and be confident in their strength and quality. The valvetrain takes a serious beating...especially if you want to run those RPM's up there frequently....so dont skimp here.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#10
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #10
ninety15.0 said:
I'm running Comp Cams springs that are good to .550" lift i believe. They are dual coil springs with a damper. I'm also running the Comp Cams Pro Magnum 1.6 roller rockers. They are a real nice piece...i paid more than i wanted for rockers...actually my whole valvetrain, but i figured i would rather pay more up front and be confident in their strength and quality. The valvetrain takes a serious beating...especially if you want to run those RPM's up there frequently....so dont skimp here.
Click to expand...

Would you assume that this same valvetrain combo would work for my setup? I mean, money is definitely NOT an issue. I just want the best for my 302, plain and simple.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jun 18, 2007
#11
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #11
Its a tough call b/c you don't know what cam you have in the car. I would give comp cams a call and talk to one of there tech guys and see what they recommend. Push rods may also be a concern depending on what was done to the heads in terms of decking and installed spring height. A length checker after you get everything assembled will be your most accurate method. Length checkers can be purchased for relatively short money and are good insurance and ensure you only go through that process once! good luck man
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#12
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #12
ninety15.0 said:
Its a tough call b/c you don't know what cam you have in the car. I would give comp cams a call and talk to one of there tech guys and see what they recommend. Push rods may also be a concern depending on what was done to the heads in terms of decking and installed spring height. A length checker after you get everything assembled will be your most accurate method. Length checkers can be purchased for relatively short money and are good insurance and ensure you only go through that process once! good luck man
Click to expand...

Now, I'm talking to some mechanic guys up here in the office who are quite familiar with mustangs, and one of them says that if the guy I bought the vehicle from did a valve job and p&p the heads, then there's no way he would have put the heads back on with the same stock valve springs.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#13
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #13
Plus he's also saying that the ported and polished heads flow very well if done right (meaning I don't need new heads), and it's the stock intake that blows ass when it comes to the Mustang 5.0. He's recommending the explorer intake, and says that I'll be very impressed with the gains in hp upon installation.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jun 18, 2007
#14
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #14
I agree that it would be strange to install the worn out springs on the newly worked heads...but trust me i have seen worse. I'm not quite sure how you could check them short of removing the springs and checking the spring pressure against the advertised spring information. Perhaps there's a part number on the springs or something so you can find some info. Again the power drop off depends on how heavily the heads were worked. You have to do a lot to get stock E7's to flow well up top. You can often get great port velocity which leads to great low end and throttle response...but getting the high RPM flow requires additional volume. good luck
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#15
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #15
I believe I will start with the intake first. Hopefully, that will fix my high rpm problem. If that doesn't work, I will take a look at the valve springs.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Jun 18, 2007
#16
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #16
Take care of the springs when the intake is off to be replaced. Kill 2 birds with one stone. Do the roller rockers too at that same time also.
Floating a valve can result in a bent valve or pushrod. Trust me, you don't want that. That means the heads have to come off.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#17
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #17
2000xp8 said:
Take care of the springs when the intake is off to be replaced. Kill 2 birds with one stone. Do the roller rockers too at that same time also.
Floating a valve can result in a bent valve or pushrod. Trust me, you don't want that. That means the heads have to come off.
Click to expand...

We might pull the valve covers while we're at it and take a look at the springs, but they may BE aftermarket springs already. I want to see what the new intake will do before I go any further. You have to understand that I DON'T know what the specs are ON my cam, therefore I'm really trying NOT to get involved with all that nonsense at this point. But we'll take a peep at the springs and I'll let y'all know.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Jun 18, 2007
#18
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #18
well you better get into that nonsence right now!! Valve float isnt fun!! Get at least a explorer intake, or have t-moss port your intake, it flows right above a gt40 and it looks stock so you have the sleeper effect!!
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#19
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #19
slow95gt said:
well you better get into that nonsence right now!! Valve float isnt fun!! Get at least a explorer intake, or have t-moss port your intake, it flows right above a gt40 and it looks stock so you have the sleeper effect!!
Click to expand...

How do we know if my problem simply isn't enough air flow due to the bottleneck in my intake?

I say let's try the intake first before we have to go searching for rocker arms and springs that match cam shaft specs I'm not even sure of.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 18, 2007
#20
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #20
slow95gt said:
well you better get into that nonsence right now!! Valve float isnt fun!! Get at least a explorer intake, or have t-moss port your intake, it flows right above a gt40 and it looks stock so you have the sleeper effect!!
Click to expand...

Wait a minute.......time out! Are you suggesting that my stock intake ported will flow BETTER than a gt40/explorer intake? If that's the case then I'll have my boy port it out for me. I mean, am I wasting my time looking for an explorer intake or should I just port the stock one I have?

Now I'm confused
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
665
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
578
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
O
Sooty/Oily Front Engine & Pulleys
  • ozenator
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
207
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Monday at 10:54 PM
Blackhawkxx
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
655
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?