• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

4cyl Springs + new weight

  • Thread starter Thread starter Obsol3te
  • Start date Start date Aug 21, 2005

Obsol3te

Member
Jun 29, 2005
106
0
17
Aug 21, 2005
#1
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #1
More than likely nabbing some 4cyl fox springs tomorrow.
Had my car weighed(each wheels weight)
And I believe it was around 900-950+ per front wheel
And around 600something for the rear.

Currently have 1.5" lowering springs in there, and some polyurethane spring isolators to try and jack up the front a little.
Don't have much clearance as it is right now, so if anything these can't fall any lower than the current springs i have in there now.

Any help?
 
L

luckythirteen13

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
648
0
0
Anaheim, CA
Aug 21, 2005
#2
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #2
are you asking if the 4 banger springs will lower the front more then it is already?
if so, then no they wont. when i did mine, the front dropped about an inch. if you have 1.5" drop springs in there now, the clearance will be the same or maybe even a little more since the 4 banger springs are only slightly shorter then the stock springs
 

Obsol3te

Member
Jun 29, 2005
106
0
17
Aug 21, 2005
#3
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #3
I am because I can't have it drop anymore.
Unsure on how the stock stang really weighs in at too.
So I gave some weight figures.

Reason being is a heavier block, rims, tranny, bellhousing.
But lighter internals, heads, tubular k, fiberglass hood some accessories gone, and elec fan.
Battery in back too.
Bah ****it
Just going to get em, 30 bux aint ****
 
L

luckythirteen13

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
648
0
0
Anaheim, CA
Aug 21, 2005
#4
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #4
the 4 banger springs will be longer then the drop springs that you have in there now are. i have no idea what my car weighs so i cant help you there. it will depend a lot on the spring rate of the 4 bangers and the drop springs you have
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Aug 21, 2005
#5
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #5
I am in a little confusion about the weight issue you are adressing. Lowering or raising the car isn't going to effect the weight a whole lot, and the weight of the springs isn't going to be much difference. If you are so concerned with ride hight and weight, and considering getting a tubular K-member, why don't you just convert to coil overs?

What you want to change is weight transfer to the rear. The softer springs will help. So would a swaybar delete and some 90/10 struts. There is so much you can do to reduce nose weight.
 

Obsol3te

Member
Jun 29, 2005
106
0
17
Aug 22, 2005
#6
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #6
I'm not saying it's going to add weight or whatever you're trying to say.
I'm saying I don't have much wheel clearance as it sits right now, because of my k-member swap.
And I can NOT have it sit any lower.
And i only said the weight figures to give you guys an example of how heavy my front end is incase it's "too much" for those springs. And makes it drop any further.
 

rsw007

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
469
1
0
Lexington,SC
Aug 22, 2005
#7
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #7
4cyl should lower 1 inch. you are going to leave the lowerering springs in rear right?
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Aug 22, 2005
#8
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #8
Obso3t3, make a damn sig already!
I just dropped $100 on a new alternator today
and $30 on a new fan clutch...
crappy...
11's on Wed. night?!?!?
 

Obsol3te

Member
Jun 29, 2005
106
0
17
Aug 23, 2005
#9
  • Aug 23, 2005
  • #9
rsw007 said:
4cyl should lower 1 inch. you are going to leave the lowerering springs in rear right?
Click to expand...

Yeah, leaving the lowering springs in the rear.
Will they be too stiff to make any difference even if I did swap the fronts?
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Aug 23, 2005
#10
  • Aug 23, 2005
  • #10
Obsol3te said:
Will they be too stiff to make any difference even if I did swap the fronts?
Click to expand...
My opinion, "no". Any weight transfer will be better than none, I would think.
I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. If you pull the swayber, put the springs, skinnies (OK, 4 cyl wheels ), I think it will help out big0time, esp. w/ those beefy new Mickies!!!
 

rsw007

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
469
1
0
Lexington,SC
Aug 23, 2005
#11
  • Aug 23, 2005
  • #11
you want the rear stiff so the tires will stay planted and the car wont roll over as bad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Hello from Minnesota (and the ancient MustangBoards)
  • SpeedofDarkness
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
216
The Welcome Wagon Aug 24, 2025
SpeedofDarkness
S
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
873
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
562
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
160
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?