• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

5.0 vs LS1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gumby84
  • Start date Start date Jun 8, 2009
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Next
First Prev 9 of 10 Next Last

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jun 26, 2009
#161
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #161
Come on, whats wrong with you TQ guys!? I thought everyone drove around the street at 4000rpm all the time?

I mean, that's why I bought my v8 instead of a s2000 you know, so I can revv it to 6000+ and launch it on drag radials at every light to get into my power band!!

Of course, I do a burnout 1st at every single light to heat up my tires so they stick on WOT and Nitrous because God forbid anyone ever pass my high revving falic symbol!

And I certaintly drive around in traffic with the RPM's 4000 and up fer sure - constantly - just so I can show everyone my V8 is FAST FAST FAST!!!! Doesn't everybody do that? I love all the gas and rubber I burn and the constant loudness of the engine! It's a great 8:30-5 car!!
 

rock4451

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 30, 2004
12
2
29
New Baden, IL
Jun 26, 2009
#162
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #162
rofl....
my car isnt that fast but i know i still torch 'em at every light, it means a lot to me to show the driver of a geo prism that my car has balls compared to his
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,289
1,632
214
Acworth, GA
Jun 26, 2009
#163
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #163
Well, basically I have enough torque that unless it's in 4th gear, if I put the throttle down the tires spin. If I am in 4th gear, and I put the throttle down, it's above 3000rpms almost immediately.

Kurt
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 26, 2009
#164
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #164
Like I said, you don't understand unless you have a fast car. Which from what I have seen no one has except revhead.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 26, 2009
#165
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #165
Gearbanger 101 said:
My torque hits hard and heavy almost instantly If I want it to and continues to carry all the way to red line.
Click to expand...

So you make peak torque all the way to red line? Wait.............if you want it to.

?????????????
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 26, 2009
#166
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #166
rock4451 said:
rofl....
my car isnt that fast but i know i still torch 'em at every light, it means a lot to me to show the driver of a geo prism that my car has balls compared to his
Click to expand...

You're cool. I bet all 257rwhp out of your car is a chore to keep on the road. Roast the tires at ANY speed!
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jun 26, 2009
#167
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #167
All those extra engine rotations just suck more gas

Then again i do have some pretty good car based conversations at gas stations.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jun 26, 2009
#168
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #168
Stopsign32v said:
You're cool. I bet all 257rwhp out of your car is a chore to keep on the road. Roast the tires at ANY speed!
Click to expand...

 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 26, 2009
#169
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #169
Pokageek said:
Click to expand...

Hey, little man shouldn't dish it out if he can't take it back.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 26, 2009
#170
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #170
Stopsign32v said:
So you make peak torque all the way to red line? Wait.............if you want it to.

?????????????
Click to expand...

Reading comprehension isn't one of your strong suits, is it?

I said nothing about making peak torque all the way to redline if I want to.

I'll break it down for you. I control how fast, or how violent my torque comes on based on how hard I plant my right foot. Its there when I want/need it and isn't RPM, gear ratio, or exhaust pressure dependant like a centrifugal, or turbo and I certainly don't need to downshift 2-gears to feel it.

At WOT, my engine is putting out about 430lbs/ft at the crank by 2,000RPM where it continues to increase to a peek of 465lbs/ft by about 3,800RPM. At this point the horsepower has been and continues to climb strait as an arrow until the two meet at a peek 5250RMP.....all while the torque figure remains above 420lbs/ft until said point. The torque starts to drop off abruptly from there and the horsepower carries until about 5,500RPM. This is all accomplished with a very small 90ci blower. It provides an intensely gratifying sensation and makes my nearly 4,200lb (with me in it) Luxobarge feel as nimble as a car nearly 1,500lbs lighter. I can loaf along at just off idle if I want to, with no one being the wiser, or blow the tires off at 70km/hr coming out of high gear and make my Eaton scream for mercy. I do all this will maintaining perfect idle, drivability and street manners and while knocking down 25mpg.

I’m limited at this point only by the breathing capability of my 3rd Generation Eaton M90S. Its quite frankly a very small blower for this application and the reason my torque and horspower drop off so quickly at red line. It would be comparable to an A-Trim or a Novi1000 as far as capability is concerned. Were I to have upgraded to an MPX case, or a larger MP112 or Screw Type compressor unit the numbers would be more impressive still.

But in any case, it still makes for a very potent street car.

More clear now? And while we're at it....why are you wound so tight all the time? You'll have to accept that opinions are going to differ and you're isn't always going to be taken as gospel all the time, you know?
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Jun 27, 2009
#171
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #171
Pokageek said:
Come on, whats wrong with you TQ guys!? I thought everyone drove around the street at 4000rpm all the time?

I mean, that's why I bought my v8 instead of a s2000 you know, so I can revv it to 6000+ and launch it on drag radials at every light to get into my power band!!

Of course, I do a burnout 1st at every single light to heat up my tires so they stick on WOT and Nitrous because God forbid anyone ever pass my high revving falic symbol!

And I certaintly drive around in traffic with the RPM's 4000 and up fer sure - constantly - just so I can show everyone my V8 is FAST FAST FAST!!!! Doesn't everybody do that? I love all the gas and rubber I burn and the constant loudness of the engine! It's a great 8:30-5 car!!
Click to expand...

Keith you are my hero:SNSign:
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jun 27, 2009
#172
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #172
revhead347 said:
This is actually totally incorrect. Torque is actually a meaningless number in determining acceleration. The saying Torque = ET, HP = mph is a myth. The myth comes from the fact that cars with higher peak torque numbers generally generate more average power. So a car with 300rwhp and 400rwftlb will remain closer to peak power throughout the rpm band. While a car making 300rwhp, and 200rwftlb doesn't have much power until it approaches that peak rpm. From a mathematical standpoint, power is the only value that is of importance. Power = Work/Time. The Work to move a car of a given weight 1/4 mile doesn't change. By the relation above, you can see how Power is value you have to change in order to change the time.

Also, I'm not saying low end torque is of no importance, just that torque below 3000 rpms is of no importance. Power = torque x rpm. So yeah, just like I said above, having lots of low end torque facilitated by a bad ass big cube motor is important to get that average power value up. But in the real world, just about every race engine stays well above 3000 rpms for the entire race. So why would I care what the torque is at 3000 rpms when I launch at 6000, and the car stays above 4500rpms for the whole race.

Kurt
Click to expand...

um, i'm not following your argument.

power is defined to be torque*rpm/5252. one can't measure power, one measures torque and then calculates the power based on the rpm when the torque was measured. so mathematically, the higher the torque at whatever rpm you care to look at, the higher the power. isn't it obvious that power is 100% dependent on torque? so how can you say that power is the value that is important and say torque is meaningless? when in reality, torque is the ONLY number that matters, whether you are talking about acceleration, power or et.

i guess what you are really trying to say is that YOU personally don't care about the torque below 3000 rpm, because you are rarely below that because you race at the track. and that is fine by me. we clearly want different things from our cars.

i am (and have been all along) coming from the other perspective ... i never go to the track, i always cruise around town. i always launch from idle and rarely go above 4000 rpm. a high revving bottle fed monster is not even close to what i want from my car.

and now for something completely different ...

want massive low rpm torque?

Leno?s Tank Car Gets Twin Turbos - Popular Mechanics

810hp at 2800rpm and 1560 torque at 2400rpm

and it is now twin turboed ...
 
Y

Yellow2002GT

New Member
Feb 20, 2006
148
1
0
Raeford, NC/ FT Bragg
Jun 27, 2009
#173
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #173
PTW ratio, is the key to winning races, HP is great to brag about on the dyno, and TQ is king if you can get it to the ground..........a well ballanced car with all 3 is what is needed.....You can make any car fast.......the LS1 is ok in stock form but add in some H/C/I and they are nasty........the 5.0 was great for its day but the 4.6 is a much more efficient engine.....the new 5.0 modular engine is rumored to have 402hp/398tq from the factory....but we shall see...that is equivelent to the LS2 engine.....when the aftermarket catches up with that engine H/C/I it shouldn't be hard to get it to compete with the LS7......thats why ford went the blower route in most cases......I for one am more impressed with a badass N/A build over a blower.....but that is just me....

"ED"
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jun 29, 2009
#174
  • Jun 29, 2009
  • #174
Yellow2002GT said:
PTW ratio, is the key to winning races, HP is great to brag about on the dyno, and TQ is king if you can get it to the ground..........a well ballanced car with all 3 is what is needed.....You can make any car fast.......the LS1 is ok in stock form but add in some H/C/I and they are nasty........the 5.0 was great for its day but the 4.6 is a much more efficient engine.....the new 5.0 modular engine is rumored to have 402hp/398tq from the factory....but we shall see...that is equivelent to the LS2 engine.....when the aftermarket catches up with that engine H/C/I it shouldn't be hard to get it to compete with the LS7......thats why ford went the blower route in most cases......I for one am more impressed with a badass N/A build over a blower.....but that is just me....

"ED"
Click to expand...


Now you may be able to teach me something when it comes to this, but the 4.6 modulars (including the 5.0) never really responded that well to h/c/i....atleast in comparison to the LS-series and how they respond. Has this changed since the 3Valve came out? Do you really think outside of a blower/turbo that there is a lot of power to be made?


What does a cam swap on the 05+ GT's result in?
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jun 29, 2009
#175
  • Jun 29, 2009
  • #175
I also think 5.0 mustangs are the meanest sounding cars. 4.6's are neck and neck too. My Z28 sounded pretty cool too but I originally chose mustang cuz the sound.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jun 29, 2009
#176
  • Jun 29, 2009
  • #176
LS1 H/C/Stockish intake




Stock exhaust vs. open cut out
 

rock4451

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 30, 2004
12
2
29
New Baden, IL
Jun 29, 2009
#177
  • Jun 29, 2009
  • #177
Stopsign32v said:
You're cool. I bet all 257rwhp out of your car is a chore to keep on the road. Roast the tires at ANY speed!
Click to expand...


haha i never once claimed my car was a speed demon, because there is a such thing as a cruiser. you've tried to pick an argument with every comment in this thread. you think because you have a fast car that it proves that you know your ****? give me a break. you've obviously no idea what i've driven before my 87 daily driver cruiser...

and you still look like just as much of an idiot as you did a page ago
 

rock4451

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 30, 2004
12
2
29
New Baden, IL
Jun 29, 2009
#178
  • Jun 29, 2009
  • #178
Stopsign32v said:
Hey, little man shouldn't dish it out if he can't take it back.
Click to expand...

yes your car would obviously obliterate mine in a race. but little man? little as in my engine? yes. but i would beg to differ on the man part. i'd bet the bank that i'd be the one callin you little man not trying to be tough...just watch what you say before you talk without knowing for sure...
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jun 30, 2009
#179
  • Jun 30, 2009
  • #179
rock4451 said:
yes your car would obviously obliterate mine in a race. but little man? little as in my engine? yes. but i would beg to differ on the man part. i'd bet the bank that i'd be the one callin you little man not trying to be tough...just watch what you say before you talk without knowing for sure...
Click to expand...

I just realized you had a notchback. NICE. I have always wanted one of those. I have seen many weighed under 3000# too. That's a 500-700# weight advantage on me and good for .5 -.7 10ths at the track or 40-70HP on motor. So if you are at 260 or whatever rwhp, that brings you right up to stock LS1 before mods. I wouldn't call that slow at all and a car to be proud of. Let the other peeps drive themselves crazy chasing numbers as there will always be a faster car. It comes down to what YOU like. Its way faster than most cars, slower than others. What are we supposed to do have the fastest car on the planet? Where does it end? :SNSign:
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jun 30, 2009
#180
  • Jun 30, 2009
  • #180
holy e-thuggin in here now LOL


 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Next
First Prev 9 of 10 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
148
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
G
Front Sway bar HELP
  • Grabberblueguy77
  • May 28, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
357
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 28, 2025
gkomo
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
549
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
D
Foxbody Misfire 5.0 Swap
  • DPORTER0729
  • May 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
569
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 13, 2025
90sickfox
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?