• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

5.4 question

  • Thread starter Thread starter BurningRubber
  • Start date Start date May 22, 2007

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
May 22, 2007
#1
  • May 22, 2007
  • #1
Just tossing around ideas, but 2v 4.6 and 5.4 heads are interchangable correct?

So what happens if you take a 5.4 bottom end and put 4.6 heads on it? Tourqe monster? Also, would it create a problem to run a mild set of cams due to too long of a stroke from the 5.4 bottom end?

Does everything else hook up the same way? Timing chains, accessories?

Just tossing around ideas in case my engine goes south one day...
 

XtorT'r

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
381
0
0
Minnesota, YAAA
May 22, 2007
#2
  • May 22, 2007
  • #2
I often stick my foot in my mouth but I'm pretty sure 5.4 heads with the exception of navi heads are the exact same thing as 4.6 heads.

All you really have to worry about is potential romeo vrs windsor crap like valve covers and flywheels that kinda stuff.
Also that whole intake issue.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
May 22, 2007
#3
  • May 22, 2007
  • #3
Cool, thanks for the info.



If you took a 5.4 bottom end, and put 4.6 heads on it you would be able to keep the same 4.6 intake though, right?
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
May 22, 2007
#4
  • May 22, 2007
  • #4
I know I have seen adapter plates for 5.4L heads to use a mustang intake for a 5.4 swap, so I dont know if the heads are interchangale or not.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 22, 2007
#5
  • May 22, 2007
  • #5
i think the heads are the same but you need adapters since the block is different
 

BCB00GT

Founding Member
Mar 5, 2002
420
0
17
May 22, 2007
#6
  • May 22, 2007
  • #6
Heads and cams are identical. The taller block makes the engine taller and thus wider where the intake bolts on. You need adapter plates to bolt to 4.6 intake on. Lots more low end torque.
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 23, 2007
#7
  • May 23, 2007
  • #7
How tall are these "adapters"? They'd need to be ~2.75" high in order to maintain the runner's line to the valve. If it's short, the angle changes. This is bad for a number of reasons. One, the air charge must change directions twice, which kills flow. Two, the injector won't be pointing at the valve anymore, which is bad for valve cooling. Hell, just moving the injector upstream 2" or more will affect valve cooling.

Low end torque is a benefit of the 5.4, but throwing a 4.6 intake on it may kill some of what it's capable of.
 

BCB00GT

Founding Member
Mar 5, 2002
420
0
17
May 23, 2007
#8
  • May 23, 2007
  • #8
Best intake is a 4.6 intake for high rpm (boost application). This will actually great a very broad torque curve. One of the mustang magazines did it a long time ago. The stock 4.6 intake made great torque low but the engine died on the top. With a high rpm intake, the low end looses some (still MUCH higher than a 4.6) but the high end doesn't suffer.
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 23, 2007
#9
  • May 23, 2007
  • #9
When you're talking 5.4L, high end really isn't a consideration. You can't spin them like a 4.6L. Not without spending large amounts of cash.
 

BCB00GT

Founding Member
Mar 5, 2002
420
0
17
May 23, 2007
#10
  • May 23, 2007
  • #10
You're right about the high end. But if you look at the two dyno graphs, you will see the usable high end is flat/slightly increasing with the high rpm intake. "High" rpm is used as a relative term, not specific.
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 23, 2007
#11
  • May 23, 2007
  • #11
I'm pickin' up what you're layin' down.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
May 23, 2007
#12
  • May 23, 2007
  • #12
Cool, pretty much what I thought it would be, a lower revving tourqe monster.

Just tossing around ideas like I said. Doesnt sound too bad, esp. since the adapter plates are available.

I figured it wouldnt be hard to get ahold of a 5.4 bottom end, lots and lots of trucks and suv's with that engine.



Id like to get ahold of a 4v 5.4... woohooo!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Looking for suggestions and or ideas
  • PonyGTrider
  • Aug 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
646
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 7, 2026
PonyGTrider
F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
448
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
R
1994 GT 5.0L crank no start
  • Red1994MustangGT
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 19, 2025
Kurt_MO
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?