• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

5sp 3.55 vs 3.73

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mach428
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Mach428

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
321
0
0
Dec 7, 2003
#1
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #1
My brother owns a 88gt 5sp manual. Our next mod will be gears. My friend owns a 99 GT 5sp man and he put 3.73 into his car and I love the ratios. My question is, since the 99+ have 3.27 stock and the 5.0 have 2.73's, will 3.55 in an 88 gt have the same effect as 3.73 in a 99 gt?
 
8

86Five-0

Member
May 6, 2003
806
0
16
New Jersey
Dec 7, 2003
#2
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #2
Well if you ask people with 3.55's alot of them wished they had gotten 3.73's. The difference in cruising RPM's in 5th is only a few hundred, not even. You gotta remember that the newer "fox" Mustangs(99+) are 2-300lbs heavier than an 87-93 5.0. The 4.6 isn't a gift of tq till around 4k RPM's. So they'll generally like more gear. I'm not too familiar with the 4.6's but alot of 4.6 guys like the 4.10's even w/ a 5 speed. I'm not sure about your question since there are many other factors to accoutn for between the 2 cars(hp,tq,drivetrain,weight,etc.)
 

Mach428

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
321
0
0
Dec 7, 2003
#3
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #3
Ok forget my other question 3.55 or 3.73, it still needs to be driven on the highway.
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Dec 7, 2003
#4
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #4
3.73's for sure, I have them in my car, my friend has 3.55's in his car, it's not much of a difference, but when you get on it, you can tell and I can take him right off the line with my gears. I can cruise at 70mph at 2500rpms on the highway it's around 2300-2400rpms at 65mph
 
2

2001droptizzy

New Member
Sep 2, 2003
99
0
0
Humboldt
Dec 7, 2003
#5
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #5
I have 373 in my fox and my buddys getting 410 in his 01 droptop...both 5-speeds.99and up needs more gear.
 

ponyboy19

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,640
0
36
Dec 7, 2003
#6
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #6
I put 3.55's in my 94 and thought they were the ****, then I put a set of 3.73's in my 95 and wouldn't have done it any other way. accept maybe 4.10's go 3.73's you won't ever regret it
 

oo7thenova

Founding Member
Aug 31, 2001
342
0
0
CALIFORNIA
Dec 8, 2003
#7
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #7
it all depends on the future plans that you may have with the car. Some of my friends get 3.73's or 4.10, then later they add a supercharger and the gears are too much for traction. So they step down to 3.55's or 3.27's.

but if you have an N/A car go with the 3.73's

Good luck
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 8, 2003
#8
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #8
ive had both and the 3.73 is a better gear. highway is not an issue
 

RydeOn

Licensed to Chill
Founding Member
Sep 26, 2000
6,273
1
77
orange county, CA
Dec 8, 2003
#9
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #9
I think it depends on if its a blower car or not, or if you drive it daily or not. But I am one of those guys with 3.55s who DOES NOT wish they had 3.73s.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 8, 2003
#10
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #10
Im NA . True superchargers could handle the higher gear. But i dont like the boost. So wont have to worry about it. Roots blowers seem to love the higer gears. 3.27 and 3.55s. I have a few friends with roots blowera and there cars work better with 3.27 gears. But as far as an Auto NA car goes. 3.73-4.10s
 
C

cmozez

Member
May 3, 2003
450
0
16
Tupelo,Mississippi
Dec 8, 2003
#11
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #11
Just got some off E-bay, FMS 3.73 still in the box for $125
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Dec 8, 2003
#12
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #12
If you get 3.73s for a 5 speed, first gear goes by pretty quick. Get 4.10s and you can almost skip 1st altogether...I have a C4 so i cant compare all that much, but i'm running around 3 grand at 60mph with 4.10s, i'd imagine with a 5 speed it would drop a few hundred with 2 extra gears. I always wanted to have a tranny built with a real low 5th for cruizing and have the first 4 gears for racing.
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 8, 2003
#13
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #13
3.73s they shouldnt even sell 355s IMO...just makes pointless threads liek this lol (not meaning your post is stupid, just 355s are a waste imo) and people decisions harder for no reason
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 8, 2003
#14
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #14
also do a search or look at teh bottom of this page u will get alot of other opinions from teh past, as this comes up about every week or so. good luck
 
S

Stock89LX

Member
Apr 28, 2003
254
0
16
Wichita Falls, Texas
Dec 8, 2003
#15
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #15
BlackFox5.0 said:
3.73's for sure, I have them in my car, my friend has 3.55's in his car, it's not much of a difference, but when you get on it, you can tell and I can take him right off the line with my gears. I can cruise at 70mph at 2500rpms on the highway it's around 2300-2400rpms at 65mph
Click to expand...

Just made a 1500 mile trip in mine to Texas.... BlackFox is right on with the rpm's/mph, although I really think I was doing more than 70 when I was turning 2500 rpm's. I got the speedo gear replaced when I had the rear done, though... I sure was passin' a lot of people, but never got pulled over by the Highway Patrol.

Anyhoo, for a daily driver that sees occasional highway use, I'd recommend the 3.73's. They are a blast!
 
M

Mustang Ricky

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
102
0
0
Maryland
Dec 8, 2003
#16
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #16
i have had both 3.73's and 3.55's in my Mustang. There's not much difference except the cruising speed (for 4th and 5th) for 3.73's is at 2300-2500 rpm's and the 3.55's is at 2000-2200 rpms. I love the 3.55's but the 3.73's were not bad either. i don't think you could wrong with either selection.
 

Mach428

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
321
0
0
Dec 8, 2003
#17
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #17
Thanks for the tips, I guess we'll go with 3.73 cause we have n/a power, thanks for the advice
 

ponyboy19

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,640
0
36
Dec 9, 2003
#18
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #18
Mach428 said:
Thanks for the tips, I guess we'll go with 3.73 cause we have n/a power, thanks for the advice
Click to expand...

even with a power adder they are fine.. I ran 461 RWHP with my 3.73's, P1sc, and a few suspension upgrades and it was a total blast. Might be a bit much for a Kenne Belle blower but with any centifugal blower I wouldn't bat an eye at running 3.73's.
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Dec 9, 2003
#19
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #19
im also another person with 3:55's who wants them over 3:73's.

i drive on the freeway to go anywhere pretty much, i dont think i could take 2500+ rpms of flowmasters for an hour. right at about 2100 rpm's is where they really start speaking on the freeway, according to my 5" tach im doing 1800-2000 rpms at 70-75
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 9, 2003
#20
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #20
Why not. I take 24 hours of DYnomax Bullet when i go to florida. Loud Loud LOud. I love it. Dont be scared. My car revs 2600 when i cruise at 75. I love it
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
286
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
622
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
W
Help with 95 GT
  • waynewl34
  • Apr 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
287
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 5, 2025
Noobz347
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?