• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

65-66 guys with 351w swap... got a question

  • Thread starter Thread starter ratio411
  • Start date Start date Aug 3, 2004

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 3, 2004
#1
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #1
What headers work best for this swap?
What are my choices for large tubes or step tubes?
Is anyone using Hooker pn:6208?
I like the specs on that header.

I am NOT interested in shortys, tri-y, or 1 1/2" primary headers. I would consider 1 5/8" tubes if they got rave reviews and larger tubes, like 6208, are shown to have problems with this swap.

Thanks!
Dave
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Aug 3, 2004
#2
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #2
just want to say, I have NEVER seen you ask a question. This is pretty amazing Wish I had an answer for you
 

RajunCajun

New Member
Nov 26, 2003
180
0
0
Aug 3, 2004
#3
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #3
Im also in this boat in header selection for my 393 Ive talked to there techs over the phone a few times and they assured me it would fit long as you meet the specs they specified under footnotes on the other hand a uncoated set runs u around 400$ where as a coated runs in the 600s

Have you checked out Hedman?
They have Coated Swap headers part#(88666) for around 360$
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 3, 2004
#4
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #4
Not interested in coated tubes.
Overrated IMO.
Also, they say not to put coated tubes on a new engine until it is thoroughly broken in.

I have checked on Hedman. They have several LTs that fit this swap. I am disappointed that they only offer 1 1/2" and 1 5/8" tubes.
They have a step header also for this swap, but again, it is stepped 1 1/2" to 1 5/8"...

Any other comments?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 9, 2004
#5
  • Aug 9, 2004
  • #5
3t
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Aug 9, 2004
#6
  • Aug 9, 2004
  • #6
I ran super comps on my 66 and the only thing I had a problem with was the z-bar I just made my own. I also remember hooker saying you had to use a 66 specific motor mount with these headers because clearance is obviously at least horrible
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 9, 2004
#7
  • Aug 9, 2004
  • #7
That was the 6208 part number?
Super Comp swap headers with 1.75" primarys?

Thanks for the info!
Dave
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Aug 9, 2004
#8
  • Aug 9, 2004
  • #8
Yes
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Aug 10, 2004
#9
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #9
My heddmans fit very nice and definitely made some extra topend pop, even with my limited power range (stock cam, performer intake). I imagine if I winded my engine out another 1000 rpms it would have been even more noticeable. Only complaint is there is a persistent exhaust leak, but usually the exhaust drowns that out anyway. Can't beat the price either.
 
M

mr-fixit

Founding Member
Jul 19, 1999
466
0
17
Malvern,Pa.
Aug 10, 2004
#10
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #10
I have JBA headers on mine. Took a little dimpling to clear the lakewood bell housing, other then that, no problem. BUT, I bought them back in '89 before the price went through the roof.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Aug 10, 2004
#11
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #11
Have you looked at Fordpowertrain.com ? They made the headers I used for my 351c swap and I think they are quite nice.
 

meanroy

Member
Jul 8, 2004
103
0
16
Aug 10, 2004
#12
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #12
re:headers

I used the Headman Shorties, they're specifically for the 351W-> '65-66 swap.

The shorties are nice because they dump right into a 3" collector so the tube size isn't too restrictive. I used a 3" pipe with Dr. GasX crossover.

You will find there is NOT a lot of space between the header and the shock tower! But I actually was able to drop in the engine with the headers installed. I also recommend header bolt locks because it's so hard to get them tight after they're installed.

I guarantee you won't have to worry about back-pressure with this setup!
I have to say though, they're pretty loud, even with a 3 chamber FlowMaster muffler. I'll be adding a small resonator when I get it back together.

Roy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
894
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?