• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

65 Convert- New subframes, not impressed. (?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter hunterhicks
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2009
H

hunterhicks

Member
Dec 4, 2003
62
0
7
D/FW
Apr 7, 2009
#1
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #1
I got a set of global west subframes welded onto the convertible, and I can't tell a difference- at all.

Yes, they are welded correctly, in the correct spots.

Has anyone else had this experience? I've always read it's supposed to be extremely noticeable, the best mod you can do to a suspension, and one would think that on a convertible they'd be even more noticeable. I've heavily modified the rest of the suspension, maybe that has something to do with it.

Check out the link in the signature for the rest of the suspension details if you're into that.
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Apr 7, 2009
#2
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #2
THe convertible has reinforced rockers, floor pan braces, and a tie plate underneth, etc. You may not notice much of a difference on a vert, but you will on a coup or fastback.
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Apr 7, 2009
#3
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #3
There are some other items you can add that will make a good difference.
1). NPD has a deep draw Export brace, it is thicker steel than the cheaper ones, and made a very noticable difference.
2). In '66 Ford installed a bar that runs from the pedal support over to the right side of the dash, This makes a noticable difference as well (in reducing cowl shake). You could either try to find one, or just make it.
3). There is a "Y" brace that will tie the back half of the subframe connectors to the front half. In my experience,... the jury is still out. I *think*, based on your choice of subframes that you would have to fabricate one.

What I noticed on the convertible in the signature below is that the subframes did more to hold the body from buckling, but do nothing for twist. I will say that before installing the Chassis Works setup on this car, jacking up the car would change the door alignment. Now, it doesn't matter which corner or end is in the air, the doors open and close normally.

For sure the export brace made the biggest difference. Big enough that I am now concerned about tearing the cowl, and am going to install the weld in support ("L" bracket that goes upside down under the cowl lip). I beat this car hard on some very rough back roads, to see what was going to bend or break. 1,000 miles of very hard abuse, and not a darned thing changed. I don't have a Monte Carlo bar yet on this car, but will add one just to support the shock towers. Not sure if I'll notice much difference in handling, but will stave off the towers cracking.
Good luck!
 
6

66candy

New Member
Nov 3, 2003
17
0
1
The Netherlands
Apr 8, 2009
#4
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #4
I have exactly the same connector lying in my garage ready to be welded onto the car. I was hoping this would improve the stiffness of my car but when I read your story all my hopes are gone......
I already installed a monte caro bar and a export brace but noticed not much difference drom the standard setup.....
 
H

hunterhicks

Member
Dec 4, 2003
62
0
7
D/FW
Apr 8, 2009
#5
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #5
I guess my old convertible is somewhat solid- Before the subframe connectors, when jacking, there was no real noticeable door gap change. Maybe ford did their job- 'verts are stiffer than I thought.
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Apr 8, 2009
#6
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #6
OK, then maybe an explanation of what you mean by "stiffness" would help. What does the car do that you don't like?
 
H

hunterhicks

Member
Dec 4, 2003
62
0
7
D/FW
Apr 8, 2009
#7
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #7
I mean stiffness in the body, it does not twist, etc. My thought was that the subframe connectors would just make the car, 'better.'
 
H

hunterhicks

Member
Dec 4, 2003
62
0
7
D/FW
Apr 8, 2009
#8
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #8
I'm one of those guys that is not sensitive to car changes- I've added all kinds of power enhancers, all kinds of suspension pieces, and I don't notice much. They are all done right, but it has to be a supercharger for me to notice something different.

That being said, when I recently re-did the front suspension, I noticed it handling corners much better. I'm going to credit the shelby drop. I'm sure the adjustable strut rods and roller spring perches did something, but nothing I can pinpoint.

Also, the new reverse eye rear springs made a big difference by giving the car a 'flat' feeling in the ass-end. (by the way, 4.5 leaf is just a little to stiff, I would go with the 4 leaf next time)

On the subject of things that do make a difference, I found that re-doing my original power brakes (with granada swap) to a modern booster and master cylinder made a huge difference. I used mustang steve's brake pieces on that. Feels like a totally modern brake system off a taurus or something.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Apr 9, 2009
#9
  • Apr 9, 2009
  • #9
I have GW subframe connectors and did notice a difference. I really notice it when jacking the car on one corner. The body had a lot of twist before and is much stiffer now.
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Apr 9, 2009
#10
  • Apr 9, 2009
  • #10
hunterhicks said:
I mean stiffness in the body, it does not twist, etc. My thought was that the subframe connectors would just make the car, 'better.'
Click to expand...


It sounds like the uni-body on your car is really in excellent condition. I can't tell you that I've ever jacked up a corner on a convertible (and even a lot of coupes and fastbacks) that didn't have flexure. That is *very* cool. It's also why you probably haven't noticed a difference with the subframe connectors. I *think* you would probably have noticed the difference over time with all the power adders. Eventually the car would start to sag.
BTW: sounds like a killer car!

Scott
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
187
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
R
Starting my 1979 notch build
  • redneck15431
  • Dec 28, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
470
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2025
redneck15431
R
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
670
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
424
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?