• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

66 bronco rearend

  • Thread starter Thread starter bocksta
  • Start date Start date Feb 24, 2004
B

bocksta

Member
Apr 30, 2003
66
0
6
rhode island
Feb 24, 2004
#1
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #1
I have a friend who has a 9" out of a 66 bronco . He said he thought they were about the same width . The bronco rear is 58" from flange to flange an the 66 stang is about 57.25 flange to flange .Now thats not to bad ,But i have a set of 17" X8 TTIIs with 4.75" backspacing that are still in the box . Will the rims still fit without cutting down the bronco rearend . If this rear has to be cut down is it true that the axles cannot be re-splined. What do you think ? I am told that it is a posi but am unaware what gearing is in it.It may still be worth buying .
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Feb 24, 2004
#2
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #2
Well, you're only talking about 3/8" per side. Rolling the fender lips should take care of that. If it does need to be narrowed, I doubt you'll have to have the axles resplined, just cut a 1/2" off per side and re-bevel the ends with a grinder and clean up the ends of the splines with a small triangular file. When you pull the axles, you'll notice a sort of line where the splines go into the carrier. This is the spline engagement. Typically I've seen about an inch of un-engaged spline sticking out. You can't go all the way up to the ends of the splines as ther is a little movement in and out of the carrier. If you're going to have to narrow, you might take into consideration if you'll change the drums out for discs in the future. Sometimes the disc setups are a little wider than the drums, just take that into consideration. Just narrowing the housing using your old ends will run you from $75-$150 at a chassis shop that has a jig.
 
9

96 DOHC Cobra

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2001
542
0
16
Cerritos, CA
Feb 24, 2004
#3
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #3
The width is close to the Mustang's, but it'll still needa lot of work to make it useable under your car. The Bronco's leaf spring perches are on top of the housing. The Mustang has them underneath. The Bronco also has the 5 X 5.5" bolt circle (like pickups). The Mustang is a 5 X 4.5" circle.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Feb 25, 2004
#4
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #4
96 DOHC Cobra said:
The width is close to the Mustang's, but it'll still needa lot of work to make it useable under your car. The Bronco's leaf spring perches are on top of the housing. The Mustang has them underneath. The Bronco also has the 5 X 5.5" bolt circle (like pickups). The Mustang is a 5 X 4.5" circle.
Click to expand...

Huh, I thought the early broncos had the 4.5" bolt circle. I know that the '80 - whenever they stopped making them F-100's had the 4.5" bolt pattern whereas the F-150 had the 5.5". I'm not sure about the 70's F-100's, but having never owned an early bronco, I didn't know. The pattern can be redrilled, but you'd also have to worry about the size of the hub the wheel has to fit over. Might be better just to order a set of aftermarket axles. Are the early broncos 28 or 31 spline?
 

SandSprite

Member
Feb 8, 2003
332
0
16
L.A., CA
Feb 25, 2004
#5
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #5
i think my 9" might be out or a bronco. it has good gears (3.70) and is a trac-lock. the tag was still on it, and it measures about 58" drum face to drum face. Pretty sure the pattern is 4.5 x 5. I think it's a small bearing housing too. it's 28 spline. I think Larry is right that the smaller "truck" vehicles (bronco and f-100) got the smaller 9" rears with small bearings, 28 spline, and 4.5" on 5-- not positive on that though.

edit: yea, i need to get the spring perches installed in the right places for a classic mustang. hopefully that won't cost too much.....
 
B

bocksta

Member
Apr 30, 2003
66
0
6
rhode island
Feb 25, 2004
#6
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #6
I still have to go and look at it an check .I dont think it would cost to much to have the perches installed. www.kevinstang.com/ninecase.html and www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/fordreardimensions.html is a good source for 9" ford info i found it yesterday .Gives rear dimensions an what cars to find them in .Also gives axle types for the rearends .
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 25, 2004
#7
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #7
As far as I've seen the only pickups that had the 4.5 inch bolt pattern were the 80-85 or so, F100's. All the earlier F100's and Bronco's I've ever seen had the 5 X 5.5 bolt pattern.
 
B

bocksta

Member
Apr 30, 2003
66
0
6
rhode island
Feb 26, 2004
#8
  • Feb 26, 2004
  • #8
66 -77 broncos have a 5-on 5 1/2 " diameter bolt circle ,i wonder if i could use my 8" axels and drums on this .Anyone know?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 26, 2004
#9
  • Feb 26, 2004
  • #9
You can as long as the axles are the right length , the bearings fit the axle ends,and your drums are the right size. And the spline count is correct for the differential.
 

SandSprite

Member
Feb 8, 2003
332
0
16
L.A., CA
Feb 26, 2004
#10
  • Feb 26, 2004
  • #10
bocksta said:
66 -77 broncos have a 5-on 5 1/2 " diameter bolt circle ,i wonder if i could use my 8" axels and drums on this .Anyone know?
Click to expand...

if the bronco rear is small bearing and 28 spline, it should work as long as the splines engauge enough. compare the axles length and note the distance between the bearing and the axle "face" (where the drum/wheel sit). the extra 3/4" (you said the bronco is 58", the mustang is 57.25") may be there. or measure the housings flange to flange and compare.

you will have to use you old brakes or get different drums (or possibly drill the bronco drums).
 

67coupestang

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
509
2
19
Feb 27, 2004
#11
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #11
All broncs were 5x5.5. 66 would for sure be a small bearing. one thing worth mentioning is although the total width is good, the bronco has a slightly off center pumpkin...
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Oct 1, 2004
#12
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #12
Well, I guess this is kinda late but I used a 66 Bronco rear end. I had to get the bolt pattern redrilled, and the drums, remove the shock mounts and weld on new spring perches, it was a PITA. Versailles was a much easier swap. But the bronco rear did come with 4.11 detroit locker so that was a plus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
115
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
S
Help with window and possible engine
  • StefRena22
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
842
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
Willybill32
K
Electrical charging issue
  • knucklehead11
  • Jul 15, 2024
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
879
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 16, 2024
Mcmahst
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
476
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?