• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

85 mph brick wall

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67coupestang
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

67coupestang

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
509
2
19
Apr 11, 2004
#1
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #1
thats crappy too!!

351W + tremec in OD + 2.8 gears = top speed of about 85!

granted it'll do more in 4th but man that sucks!!

I still think my 750 carb is too big (anyone want to trade) but gears have got to be a lot, she dont sound healthy at 60 in 5th

think 3.50's would be too much??
 

taylor4g63

Founding Member
May 6, 2002
921
0
0
Asheboro, NC
Apr 11, 2004
#2
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #2
if you have OD, i would suggest 3.73's or somewhere around there. They seem to be the best all around gear. If you want more performance, go to a 4.10, want better gas milage, a 3.5 or so would be better.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Apr 11, 2004
#3
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #3
i know with fox bodies, due to the 2.8s in the back and the .63 top gear ratio, they top out in 4th with the 5 speed trannies cause htey can't rev in 5th. I'd get 3.73s as the above said, as long as there isn't anything wrong with the engine otherwise.. does it pull hard in the other rpms?
 

67coupestang

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
509
2
19
Apr 11, 2004
#4
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #4
oh hell yea it pulls! i was just worried about 1st gear 3.35 first + 3.50 gears...
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Apr 11, 2004
#5
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #5
nah, that'll just make it more fun

I'd go with ~3.50 for sure... just as a question, what is the top gear ratio in a 3550?
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Apr 11, 2004
#6
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #6
So you guys really think you need more gear to run big speed with an overdrive 5 speed? Wow, I'm sure glad I didn't know that before! My wife's 5.0 GT with a ton of miles on it will easily run faster in 5th than 4th. Your 351 should easily pull top gear with 3.0 gears due to the massive torque those motors are capable of, even stock. Since the lower gears work as torque multipliers, making it easier for the engine to do the work, I'd think that whenever the motor is put under a strain, it's struggling. That's a sign of too little total timing, so whup out your timing light and scope it out. For checking total timing, leave your vacuum advance plugged in and wind the motor to about 2,700 or so, then hold it steady and see where the marks on the damper read. Although I'm not sure what your particular motor is happiest with, I'd suspect around 32-34 degrees would be a nice start. Then slowly advance it 2 degrees at a time until performance starts falling off (or pinging) then back it up to the last good reading. Hope this helps.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Apr 11, 2004
#7
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #7
5th gear is for cruising, has very lil pullin power, if i want to go in my dads 5spd vw, it'll pull really well in 4th and slowly in 5th. Gears are important, and i know this sounds stupid, but on any gran turismo, even on a 1000 hp car, put 5th really up there and you will actually lose 5mph shifting from 4th to 5th.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Apr 12, 2004
#8
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #8
I hate to be a jerk, but what are you basing these "facts" on? Please tell me that your entire engineering experience isn't based on the data acquired by topping out Dad's VW. Read this gentlemans' post: he states that it doesn't sound too good at 60mph, and will not pull past 85 in 5th gear. This is not normal, regardless of what anyone thinks. Also, what 1000 hp cars have you ridden in lately? What was their final drive ratio? What was the high gear trans ratio? All these factors, plus the coefficient of drag (hardly important at 85 mph) will determine top speed. But none of these problems apply to the current problem, it's a sour motor, plain and simple.
 
S

STSFCTN67

Member
Feb 5, 2003
450
0
16
Denver, CO
Apr 12, 2004
#9
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #9
My 67 pulls really hard in 5th gear and 85+ and I never downshift to 4th. The only problem I have is that the front end really starts to feel too light and floating at higher speeds. I had 3.00 and upgraded to 3.25 and the 3.00 were a noticable difference on the highway. It could be your carb just flooding you out. I had a 750edelbrock and I had to nurse it to get to 85.
 
6

68 & 00 GT

New Member
May 14, 2003
2,407
1
0
HOUSTON TEXAS
Apr 12, 2004
#10
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #10
my 2000 pulls plenty in 5th. I seldom have downshift it on the highway. Few cars can keep up w/ me just rolling the gas in 5th. Oh and yeah it's a Tremec w/ 373 gears.
 
6

67CoupeDriva

Member
Mar 15, 2004
165
0
16
South Carolina
Apr 12, 2004
#11
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #11
Well if it lacks power at low RPM but wakes up at a higher engine speeds, assuming you don't have an inappropriate cam or heads (e.g., Boss 302 = torque dog), I'd say you are overcarbed. One of the biggest factors in low-rpm power is airspeed through the carb to atomize the fuel; if it's too big the air isn't moving fast enough until the rpm comes up.
The gears will make a difference but if the engine is mis-tuned it's just curing the cough while leaving the cold.
 
6

67CoupeDriva

Member
Mar 15, 2004
165
0
16
South Carolina
Apr 12, 2004
#12
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #12
Well if it lacks power at low RPM but wakes up at a higher engine speeds, assuming you don't have an inappropriate cam or heads (e.g., Boss 302 = torque dog), I'd say you are overcarbed. One of the biggest factors in low-rpm power is airspeed through the carb to atomize the fuel; if it's too big the air isn't moving fast enough until the rpm comes up.
The gears will make a difference but if the engine is mis-tuned it's just curing the cough while leaving the cold. At the risk of sounding sarcastic, my bone stock 4.0 Explorer would walk right by you at 85 in overdrive with the air on and a boat behind it, so your 351 isn't living up to it's potential.
 

BAD67FUN

Founding Member
Oct 31, 2001
589
0
0
Wisconsin
Apr 12, 2004
#13
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #13
Can't bust 85mph? Sorry... that's a huge problem that might warrant a five hundred word response that I just don't feel like writing. You should be hitting that mph half way thru third gear!!! Something is really wrong.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Apr 12, 2004
#14
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #14
zookeeper said:
I hate to be a jerk
Click to expand...

look, you prolly know I am 18, i dont have alot of experience, so I posted what I do have experience in, give me a lil break.
 

sand1man

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
299
0
0
Charlotte, N C
Apr 12, 2004
#15
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #15
while I agree there should be no problem gettting obove 85 in 5th it may just be your settup all together, may want to post some more info about motor, using a 225 60 15 tire and not know wing if 5th in yours is a .63 or a .83 OD if it's a .63 OD than if your using said tire your only turning a tick under 2K rpm I could see where this may be a problem if you don't build any power to say 4k
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Apr 12, 2004
#16
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #16
65fastback2+2 said:
look, you prolly know I am 18, i dont have alot of experience, so I posted what I do have experience in, give me a lil break.
Click to expand...
I didn't know your age, and to be honest I really never considered it. But while I do apologize for the harshness of my response, here's why I feel so strongly about giving half-truths or incomplete answers to fellow Mustangers problems: lets suppose that this gentleman didn't know your age (I didn't) or experience level. Your advice could have sounded reasonable to him, and he then spends several hundred bucks on your say-so only to find that it was a fouled plug or a loose vacuum connection, don't laugh I've seen it happen and it's sad when it happens to you. So while I agree that each of us has the chance to make a valuable contribution to help solve each other's crisis, we all need to think before we send a friend down the wrong road in search of the Holy Grail answer to the headaches we all find from time to time. I've come to the advice well of this forum many times and have had tons of good advice given by people I'll never meet and get to thank, so I feel the best way to thank them is to give quality advice to others. There, now don't we all feel all warm and fuzzy about being part of the Mustang Brotherhood?
 
6

67efivert

Member
Jan 26, 2003
348
0
16
lincolnton nc
Apr 12, 2004
#17
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #17
well before u do anything tell us a little more bout this engine it could be slap wore out or simply to high of a powerband for 5 to pull with those gears? let us know
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Apr 12, 2004
#18
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #18
not for all five speeds, but on a T5 and on most standard 5 speeds 4th gear is 1:1 and 5th is about .65-.6:1. This doesn't sound like a huge gap, but proportionally it is. So without a very powerful engine, or a very high rear gearing, the engine won't be able to rev into 5th gear. Many people re-gear 5th to about .8:1 so they can actually use it.

this is all assuming like, as he says, the engine seems healthy at all other rpms and gears. yes, 5th should still be more worth more than 85 imo, but i do occasionally hang out on the 5.0 forum and as I said several of them say that the 5.0 tops out in 4th, not 5th. This would be why.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Apr 12, 2004
#19
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #19
not for all five speeds, but on a T5 and on most standard 5 speeds 4th gear is 1:1 and 5th is about .65-.6:1. This doesn't sound like a huge gap, but proportionally it is. So without a very powerful engine, or a very high rear gearing, the engine won't be able to rev into 5th gear. Many people re-gear 5th to about .8:1 so they can actually use it.

this is all assuming like, as he says, the engine seems healthy at all other rpms and gears. yes, 5th should still be more worth more than 85 imo, but i do occasionally hang out on the 5.0 forum and as I said several of them say that the 5.0 tops out in 4th, not 5th. This would be why.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Apr 13, 2004
#20
  • Apr 13, 2004
  • #20
sadbuttrue: I know it is not true for every T-5, but for all of the ones that I have seen, the gearing for 4th is ineed 1.00 as the top gear is in basically every non-overdrive transmission (at least I've never seen one where it wasn't) and 5th in the T-5 is the OD gear and all the ones I've seen the ratio for 5th is .68 or .63. That can be changed, and other gearing is available in the T-5, but that's what you should see most of the time...

Sounds to me like he maybe lacking in power at the lower RPMs. I have no issues with my car which has very minimal upgrades for power, at getting past 85 in 5th, going up a hill (I have a T-5). It sounds to me like his engine either needs some tuning or has some serious issues.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Suggestions for rear diff gears - 1969 Mach 351W 4v
  • cfauvel
  • Apr 8, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 27, 2024
cfauvel
C
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
Progress Thread Black Beauty: '85 GT T-Top: Winter Is Coming
  • LiquidStangs
  • Jul 30, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2019
LiquidStangs
J
Driveline Vibration
  • jeffsqartan
  • Aug 24, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 31, 2017
jeffsqartan
J
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?