• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

85 vs. 86 vs. 87> engines

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrKwik
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 12, 2005
#21
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #21
I know my pistons are stock stlye and not aftermarket that's for sure. I just checked the part # on the pistons: Ford E4ZE-6110-SB
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Jun 12, 2005
#22
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #22
Heya... if you've got them out, take a flat edge and run it across the top of the piston.
 

dcarlson

Member
Apr 8, 2005
128
3
19
Long Island, NY
Jun 13, 2005
#23
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #23
Daggar said:
Maybe they did some split year funkyness or something.
Click to expand...
There was a strike in 1985 that shut down production for a while. There were some minor changes in the cars built pre- and post strike. I don't know what all of the changes were. I just remember that there were some differences.
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jun 13, 2005
#24
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #24
This is what every 87-93 5.0 I have torn down looked like....


See the "dished" area in the center of the piston? The ones in my 85 motor look the same as far as valve reliefs go but do not have the dish.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Jun 13, 2005
#25
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #25
Well... I'll be the first to say that I'm stumped fellahs. Those pistons in the pic above look ALLOT like what I remember from the 85 and I cannot recall specifically what the 89 had in it (wasn't paying that much attention). Rick91GT may be able to help out a bit more with what's what. If it were me and I ever planned on forced induction, I'd go ahead with the 85 pistons you've got (regardless of what they look like) and maybe shave the heads to get your final compression ratio to where you want it to be. With the 85 pistons you have.... Are they shorter than the 87+ slugs you have lying around?
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jun 13, 2005
#26
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #26
Daggar said:
Well... I'll be the first to say that I'm stumped fellahs. Those pistons in the pic above look ALLOT like what I remember from the 85 and I cannot recall specifically what the 89 had in it (wasn't paying that much attention). Rick91GT may be able to help out a bit more with what's what. If it were me and I ever planned on forced induction, I'd go ahead with the 85 pistons you've got (regardless of what they look like) and maybe shave the heads to get your final compression ratio to where you want it to be. With the 85 pistons you have.... Are they shorter than the 87+ slugs you have lying around?
Click to expand...

What do you mean by shorter? Like further down in the hole or shorter skirts or what? Im definately going to use the 85 shortblock, including the pistons, one way or the other. Im basically just trying to figure out if the 85 shortblock and heads with the 87+ intake stuff is going to run lika an 87+ or more like the 86 motor. I wish I had an extra set of E7 heads lying around. The flat tops in the 85 block and the E7's would probably bump the compression a tad I imagine.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 13, 2005
#27
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #27
Yeah based on that picture, mine are definitly flat tops. There's no indentation in the pistons other then the 4 valve reliefs.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 13, 2005
#28
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #28
Daggar said:
Heya... if you've got them out, take a flat edge and run it across the top of the piston.
Click to expand...

Can't, I already bolted the new heads on.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Jun 13, 2005
#29
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #29
MrKwik said:
What do you mean by shorter?
Click to expand...

Yeah like... how close does it come to being level with the deck at the top of the stroke? You've got my curiosity peaked now about what final compression might be with a set of E7s.
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jun 13, 2005
#30
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #30
Daggar said:
Yeah like... how close does it come to being level with the deck at the top of the stroke? You've got my curiosity peaked now about what final compression might be with a set of E7s.
Click to expand...
Not sure on that one. Looks pretty darn even with the deck but I could ren a feeler under a straitedge I suppose to find out for sure. I dont have any 87+ motors taken apart right now to compare it to though.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Bad engine shaking at idle
  • sav22rem22
  • Jan 2, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 2, 2024
sav22rem22
Seemingly random 'will it fit' and 'how well does it work' kinds of questions...
  • JasonRP
  • Jul 3, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2021
2000xp8
MSpnp2 base tune review please
  • Trogdor
  • Nov 6, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
6
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 8, 2021
Trogdor
Progress Thread 91 GT - 5 lug swap, suspension upgrade, restoration...
  • Andrews24
  • Mar 31, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 10, 2021
Andrews24
M
Progress Thread Monkeybutt2000's 89 vert build thread- 408w build in progress
  • Monkeybutt2000
  • Apr 4, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
437
Views
68K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2026
2Blue2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?