• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

90 LX Front wheel offset…

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bdude93
  • Start date Start date Oct 26, 2021
  • Tags Tags
    03 cobra wheels fox body front suspension sn95 brake upgrade wheel offset
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 26, 2021
#1
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • #1
Hello,
Doing ground up resto on a 90LX. Always wanted 03 cobra wheels. Have the SN 95 swap to cobra brakes with 96+ spindles. PA racing k member and control arms with SVE coil overs.
After watching KASL customs video on 18 “ wheels on a fox, I decided to get a set of 18x9 03 cobra wheels. Now at this point the car is still in the air and have yet to purchase tires. Mocked the front wheels on and they’re sticking out pretty far passed the fender. Wondering if anyone has any idea if it could be a result of any specific part(s) of my setup. Thought about looking into a set of 1” short A arms… really that’s all I’ve got at this point. I’ve read that may require notching of the shock tower to allow CC clearance…

Thoughts…?
 

Attachments

  • 519E1664-B0E5-4698-A7EE-7572DD4A1C52.webp
    272.5 KB · Views: 279
  • 6373FB40-F591-4372-B956-59EDA3F5E03B.webp
    233.5 KB · Views: 231
  • 1CD84C53-76E1-468E-970A-7FB207FC193C.webp
    136.5 KB · Views: 194
  • 574161CF-B992-4E9A-BCEB-6968C11B2188.webp
    137.3 KB · Views: 208
  • 23AB126A-C0AD-43A3-AFE2-1324AD128DAF.webp
    54.8 KB · Views: 224

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,233
17,919
224
Massachusetts
Oct 26, 2021
#2
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • #2
Swapping from the 96+ spindles to the 94-95 spindles will pull them in about 1/4”. Unsure of the k-member requires 96+ spindles as some do due to relocated steering rack location.

Check the backside of the rim to the coil-over. If you pull the wheels in using shorter a-arms, you run the risk of the rim hitting the spring, requiring a spacer. Usually it’s less of an issue with 18” wheels but gotta pay attention here.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Oct 26, 2021
#3
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • #3
1 inch shorter control arms would bring issues with the wheels rubbing on the inside wheel well. Those wheels do seem to poke out quite a bit. Use a straight bar and measure the back spacing. They could've boxed them wrong. I hate custom wheel shopping.
 
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 26, 2021
#4
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • #4
Mustang5L5 said:
Swapping from the 96+ spindles to the 94-95 spindles will pull them in about 1/4”. Unsure of the k-member requires 96+ spindles as some do due to relocated steering rack location.

Check the backside of the rim to the coil-over. If you pull the wheels in using shorter a-arms, you run the risk of the rim hitting the spring, requiring a spacer. Usually it’s less of an issue with 18” wheels but gotta pay attention here.
Click to expand...
I have Maybe 3/8” clearance. With shortening the a arm length at the bottom, I wasn’t sure how that would affect it at the top. And obviously I don’t want to have to use a spacer cause that would undo what I’m trying to fix
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,233
17,919
224
Massachusetts
Oct 26, 2021
#5
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • #5
Unfortunately need to use a little trigonometry to calculate how much pulling the a-arm in will affect up top. 1” shorter a-arm might correlate to only 3/8” up top. Unfortunately I don’t really have all the angles and numbers I would need to do a napkin Calc.

What do you have available for options for shorter arms?
 
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 26, 2021
#6
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • #6
Mustang5L5 said:
Unfortunately need to use a little trigonometry to calculate how much pulling the a-arm in will affect up top. 1” shorter a-arm might correlate to only 3/8” up top. Unfortunately I don’t really have all the angles and numbers I would need to do a napkin Calc.

What do you have available for options for shorter arms?
Click to expand...
Yeah. I have full turning clearance but bringing in an inch would probably change that requiring the need for rack limiters…

By options, do you need manufacturers of shorter arms or lengths of shorter arms?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,233
17,919
224
Massachusetts
Oct 26, 2021
#7
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • #7
Both
 
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 26, 2021
#8
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • #8
Mustang5L5 said:
Both
Click to expand...
From what I’ve seen so far, I think the Team Z adjustable ones would be best bet. On LMR, it says when threaded all the way in they are 1” shorter and can be threaded out as much as 1.25”
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,809
906
143
Oct 27, 2021
#9
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • #9
What lower control arms are you using?

I have a similar set up to what you are trying to do.

I have 90 GT with a stock k-member with the lower control arm mounts modified to move the arm in 0.75" (I think most aftermarket k-members incorporate this mod in their design). I am using the stock length fox control arms and 96+ spindles. I have coil overs and 18x9 Saleen Reps all around with a 24mm offset. I needed to use a 5/16" spacer for my rim to clear my coil over spring but here is my tire/rim to fender alignment. Front tires are 255/35/18.

 
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 27, 2021
#10
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • #10
KRUISR said:
What lower control arms are you using?

I have a similar set up to what you are trying to do.

I have 90 GT with a stock k-member with the lower control arm mounts modified to move the arm in 0.75" (I think most aftermarket k-members incorporate this mod in their design). I am using the stock length fox control arms and 96+ spindles. I have coil overs and 18x9 Saleen Reps all around with a 24mm offset. I needed to use a 5/16" spacer for my rim to clear my coil over spring but here is my tire/rim to fender alignment. Front tires are 255/35/18.

Click to expand...
Planning on that same tire size. My k member and control arms are PA racing. Factory length arms
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,809
906
143
Oct 27, 2021
#11
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • #11
Are the control arms fox length or SN95? What is the length from bushing centerline to center of ball joint?
 
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 27, 2021
#12
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • #12
90sickfox said:
1 inch shorter control arms would bring issues with the wheels rubbing on the inside wheel well. Those wheels do seem to poke out quite a bit. Use a straight bar and measure the back spacing. They could've boxed them wrong. I hate custom wheel shopping.
Click to expand...
Yes, back spacing is accurate.
 
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 27, 2021
#13
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • #13
KRUISR said:
Are the control arms fox length or SN95? What is the length from bushing centerline to center of ball joint?
Click to expand...
Fox. I Measured last night cause I got that idea in my head that they may have sent wrong ones. From center of k member mount to center of ball joint is 13”
 
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 27, 2021
#14
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • #14
In the event of getting shorter or adjustable control arms… i notice most manufacturers either recommend or require the use of THEIR k members. Now is this them trying to force people into buying their stuff or would they’re really be a compatibility issue. I ASSUME all mounting points and dimensions would be the same.‍
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Oct 27, 2021
#15
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • #15
The problem is either the A arms or the spindles. Also the k member a arm mounting points aren't the same across the board so that maybe contributing to the issue as well. I personally would swap out the spindles to 94/95 spindles and see where your at there. It's the cheapest and easist part change to try. I have UPR moly kmember, a-arms, with 94 spindles on a 93 and 88 and neither have a problem like that. Both have 17x9 front wheels with 245/40 tires. One has 14" coilover springs while the other has 12" coilover springs. The one with 14" springs put the coilover collar right where the rim end would be with barely any space between so had to flip collar to resolve rather than run a very thin spacer.
 
Reactions: Bdude93
B

Bdude93

Member
Oct 16, 2020
35
6
18
Ferndale, MI
Oct 27, 2021
#16
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • #16
96+ on left, 94-95 on right. I see the difference where wheel hubs mount. Will definitely try to get these swapped out. Now my concern with this, as well as the aforementioned suggestion of shorter A arms, this will bring the wheel closer to the coil over. At the moment I have about 3/8 clearance
 

Attachments

  • 94F879AC-1A5D-4501-A50A-7E93A5FFD9A9.webp
    25.8 KB · Views: 221
  • 39EA9F3E-6BEF-4F40-90C1-18E03438194F.webp
    16.5 KB · Views: 199
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
Progress Thread Low Mile 89 GT Restomod - Moving toward paint
  • KRUISR
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- 24 minutes ago
KRUISR
D
Brakes 88 LX 5.0 - help! no brakes
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
405
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
nickyb
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
D
1991 Mustang GT SN95 5 Lug Conversion, Wheel Sizing and Offset Questions
  • DHatton
  • May 26, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2022
Rdub6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?