• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

94 GT, steering does not return to center

  • Thread starter Thread starter fiveofanatic
  • Start date Start date Jul 25, 2007
F

fiveofanatic

How to fuel a Mustang:
Founding Member
Aug 12, 1998
8,152
0
76
Phoenix, AZ suburbs
Jul 25, 2007
#1
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #1
Got one in the shop now. Turn the wheel to 2:00 & let go while driving, wheel does not return to center. Turn the wheel to 10:00 & let go while driving, wheel does not return to center. Car has Koni reds, Eibach springs, Energy Suspension upper strut mount bushings. Factory camber/caster plates. Stock 17" wheels & stock tire size.

Still not finished with inspection, but this one seems kinda weird. Caster should be in factory range...no bind or slop noted in steering or suspension...odd.

Talk about a small world, too. I recognized every part on the car as what we used to use at Charlie's. Asked the customer, & sure enough, it's a Charlie's Mustangs car, put together in the time frame I worked there. Couldn't believe it.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jul 25, 2007
#2
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #2
From your sig I can easily tell you are WAY too low for the factory C/C plates. Im not sure if that would have an affect, but its a start.
 

GTA_V6_Mustang

Active Member
Nov 29, 2004
1,326
3
39
Miami, FL
Jul 25, 2007
#3
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #3
Could be worn inner tie rods, or worn rack bushings.
 

cjones

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,561
0
37
Avondale, AZ
Jul 25, 2007
#4
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #4
how is the steering rack?? the valves could be stuck or broken...

if there is way too much toe that could, in theory, cause it not to return.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,225
17,911
224
Massachusetts
Jul 25, 2007
#5
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #5
Check the toe

I'm guessing alignment issue, but the factory C/C plates might be preventing a proper alignment. He really should get aftermarket plates considering his other suspension mods
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Jul 25, 2007
#6
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #6
Needs more caster....
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jul 25, 2007
#7
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #7
Curt, assuming the suspension itself to be cool, are the pedigree and performance of the rack itself known? It seems to me that debris clogging the valves or stuck valves can create such an issue (failure to return to center).

Good luck with it bud.
 
F

fiveofanatic

How to fuel a Mustang:
Founding Member
Aug 12, 1998
8,152
0
76
Phoenix, AZ suburbs
Jul 25, 2007
#8
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #8
The Green GT said:
From your sig I can easily tell you are WAY too low for the factory C/C plates. Im not sure if that would have an affect, but its a start.
Click to expand...

It's not my car I'm discussing, but thanks.

Mustang5L5 said:
Check the toe

I'm guessing alignment issue, but the factory C/C plates might be preventing a proper alignment. He really should get aftermarket plates considering his other suspension mods
Click to expand...

cjones said:
how is the steering rack?? the valves could be stuck or broken...

if there is way too much toe that could, in theory, cause it not to return.
Click to expand...

GTA_V6_Mustang said:
Could be worn inner tie rods, or worn rack bushings.
Click to expand...


No visible problems; bushings all look good, no tie rod probs, steering shaft OK. I'm also suspecting toe, possibly, but I tend to think it'd have to be so out of whack to do this that I'd be able to see that it's buggered up with the naked eye (have not put it on the rack yet).

Personally, I'm not a big believer in cc plates on street cars. The additional adjustment is nice, so is the more solid upper mount, but in my experience they're purely optional. My own cars have had H&R, Eibach Sportline, Pro Kit, & cut Drag Launch springs, no cc plates on any of them, & no ugly tire wear.

94-302-vert said:
Needs more caster....
Click to expand...

Assuming you mean additional positive caster, I disagree. An excess of positive caster creates the problem this car is having.

Welp, it's all academic at this point. He needed the car back tonight, so we finished the other work we were doing & returned it to him. He's not that concerned with it, but when I drove it, it bugged the hell out of me. My car is more aggressive than his (lower, wider wheels, wider tires, also no cc plates), & the wheel returns just as it should. I'll have the car back in my shop in the future, & if I get this thing nailed, I'll post the results. Thanks for the input, gents!
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Jul 26, 2007
#9
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #9
positive caster would help alleviate this problem, I think you have it backwards. Positive caster is what you have on the front wheels of a shopping cart, if that makes more sense.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,225
17,911
224
Massachusetts
Jul 26, 2007
#10
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #10
fiveofanatic said:
Personally, I'm not a big believer in cc plates on street cars. The additional adjustment is nice, so is the more solid upper mount, but in my experience they're purely optional. My own cars have had H&R, Eibach Sportline, Pro Kit, & cut Drag Launch springs, no cc plates on any of them, & no ugly tire wear.
Click to expand...


I disagree and here's why

On my '88 5.0, i have FMS C springs. They dropped the front pretty good, almost 2". With those springs, the tops of the tires leaned in slightly. I tried to get it aligned, but the factory plates would only do so much. I was getting wear on the insides of the tires. I ended up going cc plates and that little extra bit of adjustability was enough to properly align the vehicle.

But it all depends on the complete setup. Some cars won't need them, some will
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jul 26, 2007
#11
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #11
Mustang5L5 said:
I disagree and here's why

On my '88 5.0, i have FMS C springs. They dropped the front pretty good, almost 2". With those springs, the tops of the tires leaned in slightly. I tried to get it aligned, but the factory plates would only do so much. I was getting wear on the insides of the tires. I ended up going cc plates and that little extra bit of adjustability was enough to properly align the vehicle.

But it all depends on the complete setup. Some cars won't need them, some will
Click to expand...

I dropped my car 2 inches and with the best alignment I could get on the stock plates this happened. Then they started showing metal, then one wore all the way through and leaked out over night.

 

Attachments

  • Picture003-1.webp
    133.9 KB · Views: 192
C

chuck943

New Member
Oct 26, 2002
262
0
0
north carolina
Jul 26, 2007
#12
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #12
A binding lower ball joint can cause this problem also. A way to check this is to raise front of vehicle off of the ground and disconnect the outer tie rods,then go to each front wheel, with the wheel straight push lightly on the rear of the wheel to get it started turning. If joint is ok it should just flop to the full turn postion,if it is binding or stops replace the lower ball joint.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jul 26, 2007
#13
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #13
chuck943 said:
A binding lower ball joint can cause this problem also. A way to check this is to raise front of vehicle off of the ground and disconnect the outer tie rods,then go to each front wheel, with the wheel straight push lightly on the rear of the wheel to get it started turning. If joint is ok it should just flop to the full turn postion,if it is binding or stops replace the lower ball joint.
Click to expand...

It was caused by the alignment though. You could SEE the tires leaning in.

But I would like to check that one day. Just to make sure.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jul 26, 2007
#14
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #14
Eric, I think Chuck's comment was for Curt or those with an issue like Curt's customer's car.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jul 26, 2007
#15
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #15
HISSIN50 said:
Eric, I think Chuck's comment was for Curt or those with an issue like Curt's customer's car.
Click to expand...

Makes sense. lol.
 

GTA_V6_Mustang

Active Member
Nov 29, 2004
1,326
3
39
Miami, FL
Jul 26, 2007
#16
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #16
Ok first of all go-stang, its negative caster on a shoping cart. Cars with no power steering use more negative caster, cars with power steering use more positive caster. Having positive caster helps the wheels return to the str8 ahead position. Hence why when ppl get caster/ camber plates they use more positive caster angles. High speed stability and better handling because the tires stay in the straight ahead position. And with more positive caster when the wheel is turned the camber stays more or less at its same angles (negative) so your tire gets more contact surface and you get better traction on turns. So like said before Caster could cause this problem. But its not as likely seeing as caster is non adjustable from factory unless you shift the cradle. Have you had your car towed at all recently. That would cause a change in caster seeing as they pull it onto the truck by the cradle.
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Jul 27, 2007
#17
  • Jul 27, 2007
  • #17
yea I got the caster backwards

Just about everything I've seen is positive caster so I'm used to refering to caster as more or less w/o the +/-.
 
C

chuck943

New Member
Oct 26, 2002
262
0
0
north carolina
Jul 27, 2007
#18
  • Jul 27, 2007
  • #18
go-stang5.0 said:
yea I got the caster backwards

Just about everything I've seen is positive caster so I'm used to refering to caster as more or less w/o the +/-.
Click to expand...

The reason that everything you see now is positive caster is because of radial tires. See back in the day when everything was bias ply, these tires when you get to higher speeds tend to get egg shaped so to compensated for this the caster was set to negative to keep the biggest tire contact patch with the road as possible. Radial tires don't do this so you can put the caster postive and get better handling and still get a good contact patch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Manual steering not returning to center
  • Mike Mayer
  • May 10, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
200
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
Mike Mayer
M
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
436
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
T
Resolved Steering won't return to centre
  • Tom77
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
Tom77
T
67 mustang with borgeson style steering box
  • 67coupestang
  • May 26, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
999
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 21, 2024
horse sence
P
Suspension 88 GT- trying to diagnose power steering issue
  • pindude80
  • May 26, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 27, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?