• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

95 GT vs 2004 EVO

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1Slick5.0
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Aug 2, 2004
#61
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #61
HairyCanary said:
I like the driving dynamics of a RWD car myself, and so it sounds like the system in the GT-R is superior, at least in my humble opinion . Kinda like getting the best of both worlds.

Dave
Click to expand...
thats an understatement...then throw in the 4 wheel steering system on the R34 and you have the makings of quite the track car...


Anthony
 
S

SkylineGTR

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
91
0
0
Lake Dallas, TX
Aug 6, 2004
#62
  • Aug 6, 2004
  • #62
VIPERn94Five-0 said:
thats an understatement...then throw in the 4 wheel steering system on the R34 and you have the makings of quite the track car...
Click to expand...
All of the R32, R33 and R34 GT-R's actually have HICAS (4ws). Many do not like it, they say it makes the car unpredictable but most likely they just haven't spent enough time with it. Many of the GT-R's have HICAS removed.
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Sep 29, 2004
#63
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #63
I raced two EVO 8 one on 1/4 one on HWY , kill them both, search my nick name with EVO 8 and you will fing my kils
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Sep 29, 2004
#64
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #64
mystang94gt said:
I thought they were packing more than that but your right I check the mitsu website and that is what it says. Nothing compared to the EVO!
Click to expand...


That said, my buddy just went out a few months ago, picked up one of these Ralliarts, and I tell ya, they're peppy little cars. No match whatsoever for the stang, but still peppy, and they can handle with the best of them. Recent magazine tests rated them at the bottom of the barrel though, compared to other sport compacts, which really kicked Mitsubishi in the junk, as they'd put alot of effort into making the Ralliart a competitive little brother of the Evo.

 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Sep 29, 2004
#65
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #65
Your engine is stock what did you expect.
 

rustang94

Member
Dec 2, 2003
281
0
16
Milwaukee WI.
Sep 29, 2004
#66
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #66
I work with a guy that has a 2004 evo with some mods. We went to chicago to get it dyno tuned he ended up with 305 hp at the wheels. and runs a 12.8 at 109 mph
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
536
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Tuesday at 2:38 PM
joeybuddy96
J
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
340
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
453
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Y
2004 Mustang GT AUTO (4R70W) Grinding noise when going in R or Drive does it as I put it into park too
  • yellowandblack
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
311
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2024
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?