• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

96-98 Maf on an 89

  • Thread starter Thread starter JBeezy53
  • Start date Start date Jun 7, 2006

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Jun 7, 2006
#1
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #1
Can I swap this onto my 89 GT (with the harness adapter, round to rectangle plug) or will I have to get a tune like I would with a Lightning MA?
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Jun 7, 2006
#2
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #2
Just make sure it's cal'd for the proper injectors and it should work fine.
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Jun 7, 2006
#3
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #3
millhouse said:
Just make sure it's cal'd for the proper injectors and it should work fine.
Click to expand...

Thanks, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't calibrated for a different computer system like the LMAF is.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jun 7, 2006
#4
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #4
The real answer to your question s at: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=640997
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 7, 2006
#5
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #5
Please read the thread posted by Jrichker!!!!!!!!

This may work and it may not.

You will not be calibrating a stock Ford MAF to your injector size. That is something only the aftermarket MAF meters do.

In order for the meter you want to use to work PERFECTLY, you will need to use an aftermarket tuner that can change the MAF Transfer.
The MAF Transfer is basically a calibration file inside the EEC-IV.

Without a tuner your chances of being happy with the end result is 50/50 if your lucky.
Without the tuner you will be dipping into the adaptive ability of the ECU. However there is only so much the Ford computer can compensate for.

jason
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Jun 8, 2006
#6
  • Jun 8, 2006
  • #6
Well the reason I asked was that I came across a new Pro-M optimizer at a good price, the problem is that it is for the 96-98 mafs. I was hoping that I could use any Pro-M 96-98 mustang style meter, the optimizer and the pigtail adapter on my 89. I will be going with a s/c soon (6-8 psi) and will need new new injectors as well as a maf.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 8, 2006
#7
  • Jun 8, 2006
  • #7
The aftermarket meters, including Pro-M, do things differently than Ford did.

If you don't have a Pro-M meter now then just buy the appropriate meter for your application when the time comes.

I would start by deciding what size injectors you will need (boost dependant). What size injector you use will influence the calibration of the MAF meter.

hope that made sense, Jack Daniels is helping me type,

jason
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Jun 8, 2006
#8
  • Jun 8, 2006
  • #8
I know how everything works, I'm just trying to save a little cash by getting the 96-98 maf because they are usually cheaper on ebay and I have the optmizer that matches it.

I plan on running 36-42# injectors, actually it all really depends on which ones I find for the best deal first. I was just hoping that with the optimizer I could use mismatched parts (i.e. 42# injectors and a 24# calibrated MAS) and it will all work out. Hopefully it works out for me and I don't end up paying more in the end, like what usually happens when you try to save money and cut corners.
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Jun 8, 2006
#9
  • Jun 8, 2006
  • #9
I didnt mention it before...but I used a pro-m univer made for a 96-98 mustang in my setup. I chopped up my factory plug a bit and found it to work flawlessly with my setup.
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Jun 8, 2006
#10
  • Jun 8, 2006
  • #10
millhouse said:
I didnt mention it before...but I used a pro-m univer made for a 96-98 mustang in my setup. I chopped up my factory plug a bit and found it to work flawlessly with my setup.
Click to expand...

Thanks, thats what I was originally asking, I should have mentioned the Pro-M maf in the first post. I think I'm going to get the adapter pigtail so if I switch back to the other style maf sensor plug later then I won't have to cut the wiring again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
677
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
1
Electrical Headlight harness trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
228
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
527
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Code 41 again
  • Creomod
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
320
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Saturday at 6:19 PM
Mcmahst
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
289
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?