A/F ratio question....Help me out guys

WaterPog · Apr 23, 2004

you just stick arround there dave...I got a little somethin' for ya

Stangler · Apr 25, 2004

HairyCanary said:
Remember, my car weighs like 700 lbs more than your trunk .

Dave

Ya,... you also have like $7000 in mods,.... so ya,... I'll race you off the bottle. I'll even let you use the DR's,... just make sure "You" tune it. Cool? See ya at the track!!!

Visceral · Apr 25, 2004

ok boys....
Joe, you have the money in Paypal.
You remember my email, right? The transaction will show it. Email's good... mkay?

now...

Stangler said:
I'll race you off the bottle. See ya at the track!!!

Me too? No bottle for me either

jsturbo03 · Apr 25, 2004

Visceral said:
ok boys....
Joe, you have the money in Paypal.
You remember my email, right? The transaction will show it. Email's good... mkay?

Thanks Chris i really appriciate it

looks like nate is going to have to show dave a thing or two about the tune Thanks for the kind comments dave it is nice to know im clueless hopefully you can back that piehole up

joe

Juiced442 · Apr 25, 2004

i havent kept up with all this trash about tuning . but i do have a set of
snow tires that will hook up. just put a dominator on, make it fast and
sort-of-driveable.

Darkness · Apr 25, 2004

WaterPog said:
you just stick arround there dave...I got a little somethin' for ya

Is it project perpetuity?

WaterPog · Apr 25, 2004

well, it's coming along pretty quickly now

jsturbo03 · Apr 25, 2004

WaterPog said:
well, it's coming along pretty quickly now

That is the last time you get to area 51 with a camera Eric remember it's a secret sshhhhhhhhh Mabie dave wants to tune it for you he knows the eec remember!!

joe

Visceral · Apr 25, 2004

To Dave's defense...

There is thoroughly knowing how an engine works
There is thoroughly knowing how a tuning application works
There is thoroughly knowing how the computer itself works

You only need to know the first two to get great dyno results out of a car while tuning it.

You need to know all three to get great dyno results and drivability 3 months after the tune.

When it comes to the A9L or similar <95 computers, its never been shown to me that theres anyone in this town brilliant at all 3. It may in fact be impossible. THere may be noone alive wiht all 3 anywhere. Otherwise I would have had someone tune my little stock longblock for a few HP. For other cars, mustangs with other computers, some of our community may be very good. But the thread started with a post about a fox body car.

All just in MY opinion, of course.

chris

Visceral · Apr 25, 2004

WaterPog said:
well, it's coming along pretty quickly now

I see a heavy SN95 with a few extra heavy parts added. And someone is trying to dress up the car for a Flashdance 80's party with cool flourescent tape.

Do you have a fetish for heavy girls in 80's clothes, Eric???

jsturbo03 · Apr 25, 2004

Visceral said:
To Dave's defence
All just in MY opinion, of course.

chris

Well you forgot the most important point

EXPERIENCE

1. Terry Ryan probably the most experience in town with a basic set of parts just went 9.8 @ 136 no breakage

Cars I tuned

Sandis 2000 gt driven too and from the track 11.1 @ 129 never broke !!

909's my revolution chip enough said about driveability

and many more

If ferrycanary is going to tell me im clueless then what is his experience??

And chris i guess we will have to do a 2 out of 3 race between you and nate

Joe

Visceral · Apr 25, 2004

jsturbo03 said:
Well you forgot the most important point

EXPERIENCE

Sure... but not a single one of those relates in any way to understanding stock <95 computers. Dave's implication is that you dont. My point is that thats pretty normal. Im not making any shocking insults here. Dont turn beet red and start typing furiously because of MY post.

And bringing up your experience on Sandi's car in this forum... is a little dangerous.

Re: Nate... I'll race him 3 times instead of one... why?

jsturbo03 · Apr 25, 2004

Visceral said:
Sure... but not a single one of those relates in any way to understanding stock <95 computers.

......Either did this thread Red 5.0 has a 93 style processor

Dave's implication is that you dont.

.....Dave was just plain rude

And bringing up your experience on Sandi's car in this forum... is a little dangerous.

........Why it was fast soon to be faster!! hate her if you want that is thier problem .

Re: Nate... I'll race him 3 times instead of one... why?

......Because you might miss a shift !! Nate has an auto !!

All this is No big deal to me ,I have the experience to back up what i post .

Jordan , nate need some snow tires Asap to race chris doe you still have a set ?

joe

Visceral · Apr 25, 2004

"<95" means "prior to 1995"

WaterPog · Apr 25, 2004

Visceral said:
I see a heavy SN95 with a few extra heavy parts added. And someone is trying to dress up the car for a Flashdance 80's party with cool flourescent tape.

Do you have a fetish for heavy girls in 80's clothes, Eric???

yea, it's gonna be pretty heavy

Good thing we race the cars not the scales eh?

Darkness · Apr 25, 2004

gasketmaster · Apr 25, 2004

Visceral said:
And someone is trying to dress up the car for a Flashdance 80's party with cool flourescent tape.

I just want to know what the tape on the end of the cylinder heads is covering

WaterPog · Apr 25, 2004

jsturbo03 · Apr 25, 2004

gasketmaster said:
I just want to know what the tape on the end of the cylinder heads is covering

Looks like a little trick chung tought Eric those VJs are really stealthy Eric it was duct tape Eric used !!

joe

Rootus · Apr 25, 2004

jsturbo03 said:
If ferrycanary is going to tell me im clueless then what is his experience??

Joe, you missed the entire point, didn't you? Sigh... so I will try to make it clear...

1. No amount of name calling can take what you said and make it any more correct -- we are talking about objective fact. And no amount of experience grants you the omnipotence required to alter reality to suit your whim. The Ford EEC does in fact function in a particular way, and except within the bounds of calibration that behavior is not changeable.

(and before I go any further, I would like to point out that what you meant was "fairy", not "ferry". If you are going to waste keystrokes calling names, at least try to spell it right, okay?)

2. Your repeated jabs at Chris to collect monies allegedly owed to you is childish and tiresome. It does not matter one bit whether or not you are in the right, or wrong, in any case the public forum is the wrong place to take up that disagreement.

And Eric... until you know enough about the EEC to at least understand that it is not possible to flash an A9L calibration to a T4M0, it would seem logical to stay out of a discussion related to tuning the EEC.

Have a nice day,

Dave

A/F ratio question....Help me out guys

WaterPog

Stangler

A.K.A. Mr. Hankey

Visceral

New Member

jsturbo03

New Member

Juiced442

New Member

Darkness

WaterPog

jsturbo03

New Member

Visceral

New Member

Visceral

New Member

jsturbo03

New Member

Visceral

New Member

jsturbo03

New Member

Visceral

New Member

WaterPog

Darkness

gasketmaster

WaterPog

jsturbo03

New Member

Rootus

Officially Addicted

Similar threads

A/F ratio question....Help me out guys

A.K.A. Mr. Hankey

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

Officially Addicted

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency