• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

A Good Combination!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roger Ramjet
  • Start date Start date Nov 18, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Roger Ramjet

New Member
Oct 31, 2003
131
0
0
Southern Maryland
Nov 18, 2007
#1
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #1
I did a 3.89 gear change, an aluminum flywheel, and a SCT tune all at the same time on my '05 GT 5 speed. I also raised the idle RPM to 1000 to quicken the engine accel at the touch of the throttle. The engine does accel/decel much quicker. And, the RPM falls quicker between shifts - no more RPM hangup going up to the next gear.

I am VERY satisfied with the performance improvement but the factory tires are hating it - tire spin on demand in the first 2 gears.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Nov 18, 2007
#2
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #2
Taller gears means mor torque multiplication. A rear suspension and a pinion angle adjustment would be a good idea and should get some sticky tires.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Nov 18, 2007
#3
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #3
A new Driveshaft too maybe. The ones for the S197's are pricey though
 
A

anticubicle

New Member
Jul 30, 2007
268
0
0
Nov 18, 2007
#4
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #4
Grats! Your sig is very vague on your mods but I'll say before you even bother with a driveshaft or any other stuff go for Lower Control Arms and Adjustable Upper Control Arm!!
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Nov 18, 2007
#5
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #5
anticubicle said:
Grats! Your sig is very vague on your mods but I'll say before you even bother with a driveshaft or any other stuff go for Lower Control Arms and Adjustable Upper Control Arm!!
Click to expand...

Yeah, LCA's and UCA's sound good to me. Sucks that the DS's are expensive though
 

Roger Ramjet

New Member
Oct 31, 2003
131
0
0
Southern Maryland
Nov 18, 2007
#6
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #6
This is my street car - not a race car. Don't think I'll be doing anything else except tires.
 

Roger Ramjet

New Member
Oct 31, 2003
131
0
0
Southern Maryland
Nov 18, 2007
#7
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #7
Got a 900 HP street legal GMC S-15 Blazer for a race car.
 

Attachments

  • Pumpkin Blazer sm.webp
    44.4 KB · Views: 168

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Nov 18, 2007
#8
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #8
Roger Ramjet said:
This is my street car - not a race car. Don't think I'll be doing anything else except tires.
Click to expand...

Whoops, sounded like the way you were going with the combo it was going to be a race car How about a simple CAI or an exhaust before you call it quits after the new tires?
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Nov 18, 2007
#9
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #9
Roger Ramjet said:
Got a 900 HP street legal GMC S-15 Blazer for a race car.
Click to expand...

 

Roger Ramjet

New Member
Oct 31, 2003
131
0
0
Southern Maryland
Nov 18, 2007
#10
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #10
The steroids that my Mustang got started when the local Ford dealer sent me an invitation to check out their new Roush Mustangs. My '05 was stock except for the Steeda exhaust that it got a week after I took delivery in late 2004.

I drove the Roush about 25 miles then disappointed the salesman when I told him I wasn't interested in the car because the car did not impress me. I told him that I could make a regular Mustang GT run that good for the street with a gear change, an aluminium flywheel, and a set of performance mufflers. Then I had to prove it to myself while I saved 20 few thousand dollars the deal would have cost me.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Nov 18, 2007
#11
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #11
Roger Ramjet said:
This is my street car - not a race car. Don't think I'll be doing anything else except tires.
Click to expand...

The driveshaft will drop a bunch more rotational mass and your RPMs will climb faster yet
 

Roger Ramjet

New Member
Oct 31, 2003
131
0
0
Southern Maryland
Nov 18, 2007
#12
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #12
An aluminum flywheel is a lot better way to reduce rotating mass than the aluminum driveshaft - and it will last longer.
 

Towelly

New Member
May 9, 2006
174
0
0
Nov 18, 2007
#13
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #13
Roger Ramjet said:
An aluminum flywheel is a lot better way to reduce rotating mass than the aluminum driveshaft - and it will last longer.
Click to expand...

What? ... This statement confuses me... I understand that the flywheel is a better way to reduce rotating mass and why. But lasts longer? Last time I checked you have to machine that flywheel with a new clutch install, once you have a driveshaft installed you don't have to do anything to it....
 

stangdude2000

Founding Member
Jun 23, 2001
1,727
0
0
Northern VA
Nov 18, 2007
#14
  • Nov 18, 2007
  • #14
Only bad thing about an aluminum driveshaft is that it twists more under load which slows down responsiveness slightly, but its still a vast improvement over stock. How about carbon fiber?
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Nov 19, 2007
#15
  • Nov 19, 2007
  • #15
kooldawg6 said:
The driveshaft will drop a bunch more rotational mass and your RPMs will climb faster yet
Click to expand...

Indeed it does my friend
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Nov 19, 2007
#16
  • Nov 19, 2007
  • #16
Roger Ramjet said:
The steroids that my Mustang got started when the local Ford dealer sent me an invitation to check out their new Roush Mustangs. My '05 was stock except for the Steeda exhaust that it got a week after I took delivery in late 2004.

I drove the Roush about 25 miles then disappointed the salesman when I told him I wasn't interested in the car because the car did not impress me. I told him that I could make a regular Mustang GT run that good for the street with a gear change, an aluminium flywheel, and a set of performance mufflers. Then I had to prove it to myself while I saved 20 few thousand dollars the deal would have cost me.
Click to expand...

Just goes to show, the name ROUSH is worth a couple more thousands.
 

Roger Ramjet

New Member
Oct 31, 2003
131
0
0
Southern Maryland
Nov 19, 2007
#17
  • Nov 19, 2007
  • #17
The Fidenza aluminum flywheel that I bought has a bolted on steel friction plate for clutch contact. It should wear as well as the steel unit at 1/3 the weight.
 

Roger Ramjet

New Member
Oct 31, 2003
131
0
0
Southern Maryland
Nov 19, 2007
#18
  • Nov 19, 2007
  • #18
There are several reasons, in my mind, to not use a light driveshaft. The light materials fatigue and break more quickly, they are more easily damaged from contact, the riveted connections between the tubes and the steel yolks tend to loosen over time, and they cost a lot more. I'll stick with the steel driveshaft.
 
R

ranger04

New Member
Jul 28, 2007
245
0
0
Nov 19, 2007
#19
  • Nov 19, 2007
  • #19
Instead of either, or, why not just use them both? An aluminum DS and flywheel should let the motor really sing.
 

stangdude2000

Founding Member
Jun 23, 2001
1,727
0
0
Northern VA
Nov 19, 2007
#20
  • Nov 19, 2007
  • #20
Roger Ramjet said:
There are several reasons, in my mind, to not use a light driveshaft. The light materials fatigue and break more quickly, they are more easily damaged from contact, the riveted connections between the tubes and the steel yolks tend to loosen over time, and they cost a lot more. I'll stick with the steel driveshaft.
Click to expand...

Fatigue really isn't an issue in street cars. First, there is no fatigue failure associated with carbon fiber. Second, most of the aftermarket aluminum driveshafts are larger diameter (most I've seen are 3.5 inches instead of 3 for the steel driveshafts), so that helps offset the fatigue issue. At the torque we are running, its not nearly an issue. Even if you were transmitting 400 ft-lbs of torque through the driveshaft, it would take far more than a billion full throttle starts for the driveshaft to fail due to fatigue. I don't know the wall thicknesses of these driveshafts, but the stresses the driveshaft is put under (with 400 ft-lbs of RWTQ) would worst case would be about half of the stress level required for fatigue failure at one billion cycles. Keep in mind, when you do a less than full throttle start (say all half throttle starts), the number of cycles before fatigue failure would SIGNIFICANTLY increase.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Car idles good, then VERY SUDDENLY dies
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Jan 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 4, 2024
Vulpes5.0
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
R
For Sale 2000 Mustang Turbo 6 speed
  • rdwyellowguy
  • May 28, 2020
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 5, 2020
rdwyellowguy
R
P
SOLD 2014 Mustang Coupe with "Performance Package", "MCA Package", glass roof + MUCH MORE
  • pantheman75
  • Mar 14, 2019
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
5
Views
6K
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Apr 3, 2019
pantheman75
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?