• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

a simple beginner question, new owner

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustanggt108
  • Start date Start date Oct 2, 2005
M

Mustanggt108

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
221
0
0
Oct 2, 2005
#1
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #1
thank you so much for welcoming me , first of all.
As you all know I'm new to the mustang world, so please bare with me if my questions sound nobish.
I hear so much about Throttle bodies.
i was thinking of going with the ....Accufab 4.6L 2v 70mm Throttle Body & Plenum Combo from mustang tuning, for $414.99. Now my first question is , if my car will remain N/A (and it will),is it better to go with 70mm or 75?? and why ?
second, the site itself claims that the TB is dyno proven to give me 9.2HP , is that really true? if not , how much gains should i expect?
oh by the way , i have the Mac CAI already

Thank you all
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Oct 2, 2005
#2
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #2
http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?threadid=20529
 

crzyhrse99

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
259
3
28
Kansas
Oct 2, 2005
#3
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #3
well accufab is probably the best combo, although you will pay the price for it. others on this site will agree, as far as the hp gains im sure someone will have some dyno info for you,
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Oct 2, 2005
#4
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • #4
the 70mm vs. 75mm debate is ongoing with no real answer. 70 for n/a and 75 for s/c is a very popular rule around here, but ive also seen dyno claims that 70/75 yielded the same numbers. personally, i'd get a KB and bypass the problem all together.

of course, our wallets dont always allow that. keep doing some research on it and im sure you'll come to a better understanding of what you need for your specific application. and yes, accufab is the best performing brand, and yes, its been dyno proven. MD did a plenum dyno shootout and the Accufab came out on top over the dragon, trick flow and C&L. all done with an accufab 75mm TB by the way. heres a link

Plenum Shootout

keep in mind, although the accufab did post best numbers, it was by only 1.25 hp over the C&L and 3.15 ft lbs over the dragon. so, you have to decide if that small of a difference is worth the extra cash? also for your second question, if you look at the bottom of that chart, the 75mm TB AND Plenum only yielded a 6.31hp/6.88 ft lbs over the stock TB and Plenum, so its hard to believe that a TB alone could yield 9 hp. not saying it isnt possible, just hard to believe based on MD's test results.
 
M

Mustanggt108

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
221
0
0
Oct 3, 2005
#5
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #5
will the 70mm plenum work with stock TB which is 65mm?? if yes, isnt that better i mean "Saving money" wise, since most of the gain comes from the plenum anyways. Suggestions please
 
T

Torinalth

Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
952
0
16
Clayton NC
Oct 3, 2005
#6
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #6
personally i'd go with the same setup that i went with... the dragon 75mm TB and matching plenum (two different ones made) coupled with the tunable inductions (also known as Demolet) CAI. from my research the dragon posted the best for the money and the TI CAI i have seen post better then the JLT RAI which everyone says is the best.... I am quite happy with my setup as it really didnt cost much, and had noticable gains with all 3. if you are interested in this combo let me know, and i can show you the best place to get em.

as far as the 75vs70, yes its always going to be an ongoing debate, nobody is ever happy with one decision. the old school vs new school conflict a lot when it comes to the 4.6, so there will always be arguements. the price was the same on the 70 vs 75, so i opted for the 75 after seeing a slight gain in the upper mid range on 1-2 dynos (few, but enough to make me go 75 over 70)

also, most plenums will work with the 65mm tb unless they are made for the 75mm (i think C&L and dragon have a plenum for each application). as far as saving money, maybe. if you plan to supercharge, or really, do any higher end mods (long tube headers, cams, heads, etc) i'd go ahead and go to the 75. But then, that is my personal preference. I'm hard up on cash, but it seemed the most economical to me for longer run mods.

Torinalth
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Oct 3, 2005
#7
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #7
helty said:
Plenum Shootout
Click to expand...
Helty, nice post.....beat me to that link. Decisions supported by data are teh win!
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Oct 3, 2005
#8
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #8
thanks, im known for my quickness. shhh! dont tell the ladies

jk. no really, i am just kidding. i see you're sporting a new avatar. nicely done

but anyway, i think that was a great tech article! still doesnt quite solve the 70mm vs 75mm debate, but nontheless very informative.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Oct 3, 2005
#9
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #9
thats true no matter what the 70vs.75mm TB/ plenum bttle will never be solved just go with what ever you think will work for you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
New mustang owner
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
109
The Welcome Wagon Apr 27, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
288
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
533
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
New gal in San Diego
  • Mustang Momma
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
164
The Welcome Wagon Feb 11, 2026
Mcmahst
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
568
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?