• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

A TIP FOR THOSE WHO ARE "CARBURETIONALLY CHALLENGED"

  • Thread starter Thread starter D.Hearne
  • Start date Start date Feb 3, 2006
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 3, 2006
#1
  • Feb 3, 2006
  • #1
Two weeks ago I pulled the 331-sixpack motor from my 89 Ranger and replaced it with my "spare" 5.0 to, so to speak, "detune" the Ranger to use as a pickup again. Bought a new 06 Stang GT, that's enough "hot rod" for me now. Anyway, I had a Holley 600 on the 5.0 before, but the "Kid" sold it to a buddy, before going off to join the Marines. Well the guy he sold it to, likes it so much, he refused to swap it back to me for a Holley 750 (that would be a better match for his 383 Chevy ) so I had to rebuild the 750 to use on my 5.0. The 750 looked fairly new, so I tried it on the 5.0 to see if it'd work as is. Fuel went everywhere. I pulled it off, and tore it down to put a kit in it. During the teardown, I found the reason the previous owner of the 750 quit using it and put it up for sale on the used parts rack at the local speed shop. PLEASE PEOPLE, IF YOU'RE GOING TO INVEST IN A $400+ CARB, DO YOUR SELF A FAVOR AND ALSO INVEST IN A $5 FUEL FILTER. Don't bolt a Holley carb on, run it for a few months till the filter in the fuel inlet on the bowls clogs with crap, (Yea, the "rock" filter was clogged up with what looked like red mud, some of which also made it into the primary bowl) then blame the carb for it's problems, and then run out and buy a brand "E" carb to solve it. I also noticed that the red mud was conspicuously absent from the secondary side filter. Apparently, he also failed to properly tune the 750 to where the secondaries would ever open up. No point in buying a 750 cfm 4 bbl carb and then using it as a 375 cfm 2 bbl.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Feb 3, 2006
#2
  • Feb 3, 2006
  • #2
lol. i hear yah. we had a carb on a 440 RB and the secondary's were also not set up. man that engine ran way better after we realized that it was running on 2 barrels.
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
Feb 4, 2006
#3
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #3
hey theres one beauty to having a 750 on a 302, at cruising speeds your still running on the idle circuits. if you have a a/f ratio meter adjust the mixture till its in the green and get good gas milage(althoug youll have a bit of a dead spot at part throttle low rpm) got 25 mpg (highway of course) in my e-cammed capri, the best milage i ever got from it was with that carb. but in town just forget about efficiency.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Feb 4, 2006
#4
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #4
D.Hearne said:
PLEASE PEOPLE, IF YOU'RE GOING TO INVEST IN A $400+ CARB, DO YOUR SELF A FAVOR AND ALSO INVEST IN A $5 FUEL FILTER. Don't bolt a Holley carb on, run it for a few months till the filter in the fuel inlet on the bowls clogs with crap, (Yea, the "rock" filter was clogged up with what looked like red mud, some of which also made it into the primary bowl) then blame the carb for it's problems, and then run out and buy a brand "E" carb to solve it.
Click to expand...
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Feb 4, 2006
#5
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #5
I had a similar experience. New Holley 650 atop my totally rebuilt 351W. I had all kinds of problems with fuel delivery. The car sputtered and died out on the freeway. When I came here asking for tips, I was told that the old dizzy and ignition sounded like they were in their death throes so I replaced them ($700 in total parts) but the problem remained. Then the experts here opined that I might have a bad fuel pump so I replaced that ($150) but the problem remained. I was getting ready to ditch the carb when a shop I had the car towed to disassembled the carb and found particulate matter inside the carb. This crap was blocking the needles open. turns out that the gas tank was full of rust. They drained it and had enough rust to fill up a cereal bowl. I replaced the tank, kept the carb, and made a list of things to consider before ever spending another $1000 on parts (plus shipping) again when a $150 part would have done the job. I was *t*h*i*s* close to junking the carb for a new one and a spendy one at that.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Feb 4, 2006
#6
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #6
Great advice "D". Also make sure the screen is still in the fuel inlet on the carb.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 4, 2006
#7
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #7
HistoricMustang said:
Great advice "D". Also make sure the screen is still in the fuel inlet on the carb.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
Click to expand...
My "homegrown" fuel system on the Ranger has the following filters: One between the tank and electric pump, another filter/water separator after the pump, another inline filter before the regulator, plus the two "rock" filters in the carb inlets on the bowls. Recently, before I pulled the 331 sixpack, it was having starvation problems at high speeds I pulled the filter between the tank and pump (just a tip here: this is an "el-cheapo" 30 gal/hr Purolator pump feeding a 400+ horse 331 with 3 Holley 2 bbls ) This filter was the culprit, full of crap, not the tiny electric pump.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 4, 2006
#8
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #8
ashford said:
hey theres one beauty to having a 750 on a 302, at cruising speeds your still running on the idle circuits. if you have a a/f ratio meter adjust the mixture till its in the green and get good gas milage(althoug youll have a bit of a dead spot at part throttle low rpm) got 25 mpg (highway of course) in my e-cammed capri, the best milage i ever got from it was with that carb. but in town just forget about efficiency.
Click to expand...
Well, I think you still needed to tune that 750. Mine has no flat spots . Idles perfectly, runs perfectly, the motor just doesn't generate enough vacuum to open the secondaries. If it does, it does it so gently that you can't feel them. I even tried both a "black" (heavy) secondary spring, then switched to the lightest sec. spring. Virtually no difference that I can tell. The only thing I've noticed is the lack of power, but that's what you get in going from a 400+ horse motor to a 275 horse motor.
 

wild70stang

New Member
Nov 11, 2005
317
0
0
Feb 4, 2006
#9
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #9
My Carter AFB carb also didnt have a fuel filter inlet installed when I bought my mustang, and the guy used it for daily driving without 1. Its funny when you have to rig up a fuel filter system when there wasnt one to begin with, and get to have fun being showered with gasoline when you dont have a hose clamp when you remove the fuel line. ( I was broke at the time).
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Feb 4, 2006
#10
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #10
Its funny, there are tons of people who will dog on Holleys for being tempermental, hard to tune, or even downright "impossible" to tune. Many of the same people have nothing but praise for the new Carter-style carb they got and didnt have to touch. Those are the types that have no business getting inside a carb. While not rampant, I do see this more often in the forums dealing with EFI cars. My fleabay 650 still needs tuning and I'll admit I'm not that great with Holleys yet, but I do recognize that the tune is the problem and not the carb.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
D
Carb Spitting
  • daer0
  • May 16, 2021
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 28, 2021
7991LXnSHO
Need Help, Car Wont Start, I've Gone Through Both Checklists
  • 93silverlx50
  • Jul 22, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
12K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2019
General karthief
The Towering Inferno (the 1970 Mach 1 Version)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2016
smokin joe
A
92 Gt W/351w Advice Needed
  • adumb
  • Sep 24, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
141
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 31, 2015
adumb
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?