• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

about to go turbo...what do i need?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cenok is family
  • Start date Start date Mar 2, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Mar 4, 2013
#21
  • Mar 4, 2013
  • #21
Why do people say On3 sucks...yes they have some problems Mine didnt.But i think the people who have the problems dont know what there doing... i have the kit for over a yr drive my car daily and it fits perfect..performs awesome...has no fitment issues...makes great power !!! I love driving my car with the turbo...puts a smile on face everyday...especially when someone wants to race and you just suck there headlights out...lol...for the price im very very very happy with the kit...
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Mar 4, 2013
#22
  • Mar 4, 2013
  • #22
MY 85 GT said:
Why do people say On3 sucks...yes they have some problems Mine didnt.But i think the people who have the problems dont know what there doing... i have the kit for over a yr drive my car daily and it fits perfect..performs awesome...has no fitment issues...makes great power !!! I love driving my car with the turbo...puts a smile on face everyday...especially when someone wants to race and you just suck there headlights out...lol...for the price im very very very happy with the kit...
Click to expand...

honestly, i know i could have made the on3 kit work just fine. i co-own a body shop but we have metal fab equipment as well. the only reason i didn't get the on3 was because i would have wanted to get a better turbo anyways, so after the price of the on3 kit plus a different turbo, i could just get the treadstone kit with a turbonetics turbo. what kind of numbers and/or times are you putting down my 85 gt? i see you have a moates quarterhorse, do you tune yourself? i've been thinking about grabbing a moates as well and doing my own tuning.
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Mar 4, 2013
#23
  • Mar 4, 2013
  • #23
I have a convertible getting the roll bar installed this week...havent taken it yet due to it being a convertible and you cant go faster the 13.49...im sure im a little faster then that..lol..when it was a stock long block with a powerdyne 1st and only run i went 13.3 got told to slow down NO ROLL BAR..lol so i said if im going to need a roll bar im really going to need one...The shop that did my turbo install and motor work did the moates QH and tune...but im switching it going with a Mega squirt plug and play...the shop says way better then the QH..i didnt do it intially money was a little tight,so i am now...As far as numbers i made just shy of 500 rwhp thru an AOD it had more but its a stock block..so they backed it down with a very safe tune...[ a little rich] thats why i want the Mega squirt and re-tune...I also run the on3 turbo 70mm .68 A/R spools wicked fast and seems like a decent turbo...if it goes i will upgrade to a ball bearing type...but stay with the same size...car make awesome power...
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,485
8,707
234
S.I.NY
Mar 5, 2013
#24
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #24
MY 85 GT said:
I have a convertible getting the roll bar installed this week...havent taken it yet due to it being a convertible and you cant go faster the 13.49...im sure im a little faster then that..lol..when it was a stock long block with a powerdyne 1st and only run i went 13.3 got told to slow down NO ROLL BAR..lol so i said if im going to need a roll bar im really going to need one...The shop that did my turbo install and motor work did the moates QH and tune...but im switching it going with a Mega squirt plug and play...the shop says way better then the QH..i didnt do it intially money was a little tight,so i am now...As far as numbers i made just shy of 500 rwhp thru an AOD it had more but its a stock block..so they backed it down with a very safe tune...[ a little rich] thats why i want the Mega squirt and re-tune...I also run the on3 turbo 70mm .68 A/R spools wicked fast and seems like a decent turbo...if it goes i will upgrade to a ball bearing type...but stay with the same size...car make awesome power...
Click to expand...
Check the nut on the impeller and make sure it is not coming loose at all , on 3 are known for the nut to back off and blow the turbo up , like I said I like the kit just better turbo is needed IMO
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Mar 5, 2013
#25
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #25
Thanks for the heads up...i will take a look...
 
Reactions: toolow91

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Mar 5, 2013
#26
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #26
the 62mm turbo is going to be a fun street car, I feel sorry for your tires.

Good luck, keep the tune safe and dont get greedy on power and save money for tires.
 
Reactions: toolow91

MikeROD16

Member
Feb 4, 2008
0
0
17
Miami, FL
Mar 5, 2013
#27
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #27
I honestly think so. My old Conquest had a 2.6 4 banger with a 60-1 and it was putting down 300.

My word of advice after dealing with turbos, it's all in the tune and always check your oil and oil lines and stay on top of it. They can be real finicky.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Mar 5, 2013
#28
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #28
The problem with a turbo and a stock block is that all you need to do is turn a knob in the car and bam...more boost. That's waaay too tempting. I'd be in block splitting territory so fast. I envy you if you have the discliping to keep the car in the 400rwhp range.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Mar 5, 2013
#29
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #29
why limit to 400. Get a safe tune 450-480 and you'll be fine as long as you keep the revs below 6k
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,485
8,707
234
S.I.NY
Mar 5, 2013
#30
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #30
my buddys car ran 12 psi made 475 at the tire through a c4 , Ran great. Went best of 11.2x on 18 in saleens at 127 mph. They are FUN
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Mar 5, 2013
#31
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #31
MY 85 GT said:
Why do people say On3 sucks...yes they have some problems Mine didnt.But i think the people who have the problems dont know what there doing... i have the kit for over a yr drive my car daily and it fits perfect..performs awesome...has no fitment issues...makes great power !!! I love driving my car with the turbo...puts a smile on face everyday...especially when someone wants to race and you just suck there headlights out...lol...for the price im very very very happy with the kit...
Click to expand...

People say they suck, because they suck.
I know people extremely versed in pretty much every phase of modifying mustangs. I've seen how on3 kit's fit in person (which is not good) and if somehow you overcome their fitment issues, you still have to worry about the turbo blowing itself to pieces. I know people that have been given estimates almost as high as the whole kit costs, just to fix it.

You get what you pay for most of the time.
A $2000 vortech is a much better purchase. Start the install on saturday and drive it to work on monday.

I'm not opposed to turbos, i just think it's one of those mods you either go all in on, or you don't do at all. Doing a cheap kit just so you can say you have a turbo IMO isn't worth the trouble.
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe and RacEoHolic330

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Mar 5, 2013
#32
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #32
Well im very happy with what i got runs great..fits great..fast s hell...been there done that with superchargers wanted something different...And wanted to give the under dog turbo a try...See im not worried about money or if it goes Guess what i get it rebuilt go with a dart block better turbo...Faster stronger more fun...This is one of MY cars one toy i have many...i think for the price its KICK ASS.....fun to drive and very FAST..
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Mar 5, 2013
#33
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #33
about to go turbo...what do i need? money
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Mar 5, 2013
#34
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #34
I know what you dont need, FONT SIZE AND BOLD KEY
 

Simply Willens

New Member
Oct 11, 2008
21
0
1
Wichita, KS
Mar 5, 2013
#35
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #35
A Walbro GSS 341 and a hotwire should be more than sufficient for your goals. a 340 is overkill.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Mar 6, 2013
#36
  • Mar 6, 2013
  • #36
S&B said:
I know what you dont need, FONT SIZE AND BOLD KEY
Click to expand...
what a don't need or do?? Yeah my bad slick, I copy and pasted the thread title and it came out that way. But after lookin at it again, I kinda like it
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 6, 2013
#37
  • Mar 6, 2013
  • #37
2000xp8 said:
People say they suck, because they suck.
I know people extremely versed in pretty much every phase of modifying mustangs. I've seen how on3 kit's fit in person (which is not good) and if somehow you overcome their fitment issues, you still have to worry about the turbo blowing itself to pieces. I know people that have been given estimates almost as high as the whole kit costs, just to fix it.

You get what you pay for most of the time.
A $2000 vortech is a much better purchase. Start the install on saturday and drive it to work on monday.

I'm not opposed to turbos, i just think it's one of those mods you either go all in on, or you don't do at all. Doing a cheap kit just so you can say you have a turbo IMO isn't worth the trouble.
Click to expand...

The On3 "fit" argument always cracks me up, considering this is a hobby where 351 swaps, MOD MOTOR SWAPS, long tube headers, rolled fenders, removed quad shocks, piston notching, intake spacers, valve cover grinding, radiator bracket bending, and general BFH sheetmetal massaging is the norm. I understand that people expect anything that's called a "kit" to just sort of fall into place, but for the money you save buying a $1500 turbo kit, what's a few extra hours spent getting everything squared away?

Now, as far as the quality of the turbo itself, I can't say. It is what it is for $1500 I guess. I just think bi tching about install fitment is silly. My brain melts out of my ears every time I see one of those 12 page long threads on the Corral where some half-wit is crying about 1/4" misalignment between two pipes after making zero real effort to readjust anything.
 
Reactions: cenok is family and toolow91

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,485
8,707
234
S.I.NY
Mar 7, 2013
#38
  • Mar 7, 2013
  • #38
NIKwoaC said:
The On3 "fit" argument always cracks me up, considering this is a hobby where 351 swaps, MOD MOTOR SWAPS, long tube headers, rolled fenders, removed quad shocks, piston notching, intake spacers, valve cover grinding, radiator bracket bending, and general BFH sheetmetal massaging is the norm. I understand that people expect anything that's called a "kit" to just sort of fall into place, but for the money you save buying a $1500 turbo kit, what's a few extra hours spent getting everything squared away?

Now, as far as the quality of the turbo itself, I can't say. It is what it is for $1500 I guess. I just think ****ing about install fitment is silly. My brain melts out of my ears every time I see one of those 12 page long threads on the Corral where some half-wit is crying about 1/4" misalignment between two pipes after making zero real effort to readjust anything.
Click to expand...
It's not a terrible kit like you are saying , and your right people don't want to take the time Nik , my friends kit was great almost 2 years no issues , but the turbo was swapped for a master power before it went on and tial blow off and waste gate , only problem he ever had was the weld broke on the waste gate flange so he bought a Bigger wastegate and had the chassis guy tig it and he was back at it .
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Mar 7, 2013
#39
  • Mar 7, 2013
  • #39
NIKwoaC said:
The On3 "fit" argument always cracks me up, considering this is a hobby where 351 swaps, MOD MOTOR SWAPS, long tube headers, rolled fenders, removed quad shocks, piston notching, intake spacers, valve cover grinding, radiator bracket bending, and general BFH sheetmetal massaging is the norm. I understand that people expect anything that's called a "kit" to just sort of fall into place, but for the money you save buying a $1500 turbo kit, what's a few extra hours spent getting everything squared away?

Now, as far as the quality of the turbo itself, I can't say. It is what it is for $1500 I guess. I just think bi tching about install fitment is silly. My brain melts out of my ears every time I see one of those 12 page long threads on the Corral where some half-wit is crying about 1/4" misalignment between two pipes after making zero real effort to readjust anything.
Click to expand...

So you are comparing a bunch of minor fixes that any noob with a toolbox can do, to cutting, welding and realigning a turbo kit?

The point really is that you get what you pay for and the sensible thing is to just pay for something better. It's no different than the pro comp heads, you can buy them cheap then dump money in them to make them right or you can just buy twisted wedges or afr's, either way you are spending the same amount of money, except for in the end if you buy the better product, you have just that, a better product.
Ever see the price of stainless pipe? Not exactly the stuff to experiment with if you aren't a good welder (or have a welder at all).

People in the market for cheap turbo kit's are already on a budget, hence the fact that they bought on3 to begin with, adding more time and money to already slim wallet.

This is why i just like the idea of the vortech kit, you know it's going to be reliable, fit well and produce the power.
The on3 kit is nothing but a potential headache for the sake of being different.

Btw my "MOD MOTOR SWAP", required little to no fabrication and was not based on some unreasonable $1500 budget. Mainly it require reading diagrams and collecting the right parts for the job. About the only thing on it outside the realm of the average guy was welding on the heat exchanger, which i knew going into it, i never expected it to work as is.
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Mar 7, 2013
#40
  • Mar 7, 2013
  • #40
Well money isnt an issue with me...i could have bought any turbo kit ANY....i wanted to give the under dog kit a chance why not...I have a stock bottom end anyways even this kit can split it...i figure when and if i do blow this motor up i build a Dart block and then maybe upgrade to a different turbo kit..Also boost is boost this kit will still propell my car into the 11's maybe 10's... My car is a vert and heavy so thats why i say maybe 10's ..AGAIN i will say this i drive this car daily for over a yr now it works great..Im not saying it wont have any issues or its perfect but AS of now its just fine.....
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Fox Help
  • 93fox85
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
219
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2026
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
263
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?