• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Advantages to stud mount rockers, rather than pedistal mount??

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95CobraMike
  • Start date Start date Feb 23, 2006

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Feb 23, 2006
#1
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #1
What are some of the advantages of going stud mount rather than pedistal mount on your rocker arms??

i know that studs are stronger and they are adjustable....but what does that mean to be adjustable? what are the advantages of a rocker arm being adjustable?

thanks
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 23, 2006
#2
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #2
My thoughts would be

A little more stronger

A little more stable

Flexability of adjustment ...... with ease

They cost more and to me ...... they are worth it

Grady
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Feb 23, 2006
#3
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #3
Thanks Grady,

But what exactly is the point of having adjustable rocker arms? does it have to do with pushrod length?
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Feb 23, 2006
#4
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #4
NO SHIMS...they adj. easier.

I dont know how much of a diff. in pushrod length you can make up with them though...you would think there is some kind of limit.
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Feb 23, 2006
#5
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #5
so if your push rods are SLIGHTLY off, when you adjust your rr's you can make up for the little diffrence?
 

Black95GT_Kid

Member
May 3, 2005
57
1
8
Cochranville PA
Feb 23, 2006
#6
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #6
granted the stud mount rocker arms are stronger but if your using stock heads then the work isnt worth it. with a stock head motor you most likely are not makin enough power to need the extra strength. the crane 1.7 rocker arms are a great upgrade from stock. i put them on my car and didnt need the shims as i have heard from others. how ever i would recomend changing the springs and valve seals while you have the heads open.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 23, 2006
#7
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #7
95CobraMike said:
Thanks Grady,

But what exactly is the point of having adjustable rocker arms? does it have to do with pushrod length?
Click to expand...

I guess I could have been more clear Mike but I usually post too much junk anyway and I'm tryin to cut back

Here is my take on this part of the valve train

Lets say you got every part of the vt perfect.

For a street car, you'll most likely run a pre load range of 1/4 to 3/4 of a turn.

With a stud setup, you just set it as you wish it to be.

With a ped setup

You first check it for a base line
Then you shim
or
Then you change push rods

What if you decide you don't wanna run at 1/4 anymore
and
you decide to to run at 3/4

Flexability and ease of adjustment!

Know what I mean Vern?

Grady
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 23, 2006
#8
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #8
Black95GT_Kid said:
granted the stud mount rocker arms are stronger but if your using stock heads then the work isnt worth it. with a stock head motor you most likely are not makin enough power to need the extra strength. the crane 1.7 rocker arms are a great upgrade from stock. i put them on my car and didnt need the shims as i have heard from others. how ever i would recomend changing the springs and valve seals while you have the heads open.
Click to expand...

For the most part, stock oem iron heads will always use the intended ped setup as the expense to convert them over is kinda high ... if you do it right.

Grady
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Feb 23, 2006
#9
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #9
final5-0 said:
I guess I could have been more clear Mike but I usually post too much junk anyway and I'm tryin to cut back

Here is my take on this part of the valve train

Lets say you got every part of the vt perfect.

For a street car, you'll most likely run a pre load range of 1/4 to 3/4 of a turn.

With a stud setup, you just set it as you wish it to be.

With a ped setup

You first check it for a base line
Then you shim
or
Then you change push rods

What if you decide you don't wanna run at 1/4 anymore
and
you decide to to run at 3/4

Flexability and ease of adjustment!

Know what I mean Vern?

Grady
Click to expand...


i know what you mean... ...Earnest

so push rod length doesnt matter all that much?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 23, 2006
#10
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #10
95CobraMike said:
i know what you mean... ...Earnest

so push rod length doesnt matter all that much?
Click to expand...

Even if you go stud mount, you do need the correct vt geometry which does mean a pr that is the correct length. But yes, once you get the correct length it is as above.

I just was trying to show you could go from one extreme to the other with the stud setup and no other parts would be needed.

On the peds, you gotta do all that other shims & diff length pr stuff.

Grady
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Feb 24, 2006
#11
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #11
i got you....

so now my next question is... how do you determine the correct pushrod length if your rockers are adjustable? you know with your old ped mount ones you install them with the valve closed, then you measure from rocker arm to the lifter (pretty much) how do you do it when the distance between rocker and lifter can be changed by the simple turn of a nut?
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Feb 24, 2006
#12
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #12
Either way, IMO, the VT can be considered the most crucial part of the engine, it manipulates the flow characteristics of the entire engine, putting a little extra dough and reliability cannot hurt.

I would definately go with pedastal.
 

FORCED2DV8

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
458
0
0
Grand Rapids MI
Feb 24, 2006
#13
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #13
SWYZ721 said:
Either way, IMO, the VT can be considered the most crucial part of the engine, it manipulates the flow characteristics of the entire engine, putting a little extra dough and reliability cannot hurt.

I would definately go with pedastal.
Click to expand...




You mean Stud right....
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Feb 24, 2006
#14
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #14
FORCED2DV8 said:
You mean Stud right....
Click to expand...

i think he does...
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Feb 24, 2006
#15
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #15
You won't see any benefit from changing your rockers since you already have good ones. If you eventually get aftermarket heads, they'll already be setup for studs so you won't be able to use pedestal rockers anyway.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 24, 2006
#16
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #16
95CobraMike said:
i got you....

so now my next question is... how do you determine the correct pushrod length if your rockers are adjustable? you know with your old ped mount ones you install them with the valve closed, then you measure from rocker arm to the lifter (pretty much) how do you do it when the distance between rocker and lifter can be changed by the simple turn of a nut?
Click to expand...

There is more to it than this but you can paint the top of the valve tip with a marks a lot and turn the motor over a time or two. You want the roller to travel a certain distance (can't remember the amount) across the center of the valve tip.

Here is a pic of mine for you



Lots of stuff to consider Mike like coil bind, roller travel across the valve tip, and more, but even if we were talking on the phone, pics would help so much more to show what is really going on with the valve train.

IMHO, here is the best way to see the light on all this stuff!

The big cam companies like Crane, Comp, etc have great stuff on their sites with pics and everything.

When you see the pics and spend just a little time reading the faqs and such, you'll see the big picture and it will all make sense.

Grady
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Feb 24, 2006
#17
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #17
ok i will have to look into that more...

Zero, i just bought some TW's and thats why i am asking
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD Crane Cams 1.7 Pedestal Mount rockers - Ford OEM style replacement
  • TTSaleen
  • Jun 25, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
97
Other Classifieds Jun 25, 2026
TTSaleen
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
221
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
D
Rockers, lash adjusters and timing: help with parts (4.6 2v)
  • dvigAtel
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
250
Other Auto Tech Nov 1, 2025
dvigAtel
D
Motor mounts question
  • djj62478
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
499
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
nickyb
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
134
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?