• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Advice Wanted

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drews93fox
  • Start date Start date Jun 6, 2011
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 6, 2011
#1
  • Jun 6, 2011
  • #1
Hey guys,

I am trying to get more horsepower for my car cheap. I am going through college and I dont have a lots of money to spend on my car. I have found a 5.0 engine from a 1997 mercury and I can buy the complete engine for $250. Im kinda think that if I buy it I would take the heads and intake off and put it on my 93 fox. I would then probably buy a off the shelf cam for it to give it some more horses.

My second option, I was bought a 351 windsor cheap. This engine was gone through by a respected shop in town about 5000 miles before I purchased it. The down side is its a 1983 block. If I go this way I would have to put the gt40 heads on the 351 and buy a different intake for time being. I would also have to buy a roller cam and go through this route. I know that 302 parts make 302 power but, Is it worth it to start with a 351 block and then eventually go to better heads when I have the money.

So, After the long read should I buy the 5.0 out of the mercury and put the parts on my 302 in my car now, or should I go with the 351 block with 302 heads until I can afford better.(probably 3 to 4 years)

Thanks for all the opinions

Drew
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Jun 6, 2011
#2
  • Jun 6, 2011
  • #2
Buy the mercury motor, buy new cam and valve springs and call it a day. With the 351 you would need a new oil pan, headers, intake.. and that stuff adds up quick. Especially when you have no money.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Jun 7, 2011
#3
  • Jun 7, 2011
  • #3
ID89GT said:
Buy the mercury motor, buy new cam and valve springs and call it a day. With the 351 you would need a new oil pan, headers, intake.. and that stuff adds up quick. Especially when you have no money.
Click to expand...

The headers for the 351 and maybe the intake are the expensive part. If you can find a van with a 351 or an LTD police interceptor 351 in a junk yard those both have the double sump that will work in the fox. You also have to get the pickup tube with the pan.(FRPP also sells the pair for $200 i believe) You didn't say if you were running carb or e.f.i.... If carb, you can pick up an intake off c.l. or a swap meet cheap, e.f.i is another story.Don't forget hood clearance issues with the 351.


In other words, the 351 is more expensive, but It can be done on a budget, I've done it. It's also a real time consuming pita to gather all the stuff together, and if this car is your sole transportation, the 302 may be the better idea.

Good luck.
 

TRICKYGT

New Member
Jun 7, 2011
59
0
0
Rochester, NY
Jun 7, 2011
#4
  • Jun 7, 2011
  • #4
Turbonator
 
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 8, 2011
#5
  • Jun 8, 2011
  • #5
Thanks for the advice fellas

The car will be staying fuel injected. Is there an older car or truck that used a 351 engine, fuel injected?

I also didn't think about a oil pan, and I would have to get a new oil pump for the 351 too... I think that I am leaning towards sticking with my 302

Thanks for the help Drew
 

JSSuper455

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2002
197
0
16
UT
Jun 8, 2011
#6
  • Jun 8, 2011
  • #6
I'd stick with the 302 in the fox also. Ford used the 351 in lots of cars and trucks. IIRC when fuel injection hit, it was only found in the F-series, vans and Bronco.

If you want to build a 351 car, it might be kinda cool to build a Crown Vic or LTD Victoria, whichever it is. I am thinking of the 4-eyed car like the one in Men in Black that Smith calls a "Ford POS"

Stuffing a warmed up 351 in one of those would be kinda fun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
130
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
C
347 advice
  • CRonaldo773
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
252
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
2000xp8
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
638
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
293
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?