• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Aftermarket TB's Suck! Beware

  • Thread starter Thread starter kkdoughboy
  • Start date Start date Aug 20, 2007
K

kkdoughboy

New Member
Jul 20, 2007
212
0
0
Pennsylvania
Aug 20, 2007
#1
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #1
Just wanted to voice my opinion on these aftermarket TB's. First I purchased an MMR TB for around $400. Tried to install it and the car was f'ed. Check engine light, wrench indicator and wouldnt rev. Reinstalled the stock TB and all was fine. Sent the aftermarket TB back to MMR. They looked at it and said they adjusted it and it would definately work. Well what do you know- it didnt work. The same damn thing happened when I installed it. Called MMR again and they basically told me I'm stuck with the damn thing. What a great company that is. Then I decided to ditch the MMR TB and take a loss. I go out and buy a Granatelli TB for around $450. Well wouldnt you know this damn thing doesnt work either. I am an expert at installing these TB's now! I have installed then removed and so on and so on about 10 times now with no luck. To make a long story short dont waste your time buying these piece of s things. It's not worth the 2-6 hp you might get. Later fellas.
 
R

ranger04

New Member
Jul 28, 2007
245
0
0
Aug 21, 2007
#2
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #2
I'm telling you this new drive by wire is going to make TB swaps touch and go.
 

lightblade

Member
Aug 7, 2004
366
0
17
Aug 21, 2007
#3
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #3
I've had the bbk 62mm tb for about 500 miles now, with zero problems. And I personaly will never buy gms. 02 cents.
 

Radman

New Member
Feb 4, 2007
113
0
0
Texas
Aug 21, 2007
#4
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #4
Lemme know when you put 'em on ebay!
 
S

Stang457

New Member
May 3, 2001
27
0
0
Long Island NY
Aug 23, 2007
#5
  • Aug 23, 2007
  • #5
I installed a bbk and it sucked. any time i drove it for more then 45min is would get stuck on. i ended up putting the stock one back in.


lightblade said:
I've had the bbk 62mm tb for about 500 miles now, with zero problems. And I personaly will never buy gms. 02 cents.
Click to expand...
 

lightblade

Member
Aug 7, 2004
366
0
17
Aug 23, 2007
#6
  • Aug 23, 2007
  • #6
Stang457 said:
I installed a bbk and it sucked. any time i drove it for more then 45min is would get stuck on. i ended up putting the stock one back in.
Click to expand...

when i first installed it i pushed the throttle open with my finger and it got stuck or stayed open, i tooked it back a part and found that i clocked the spring wrong, pulled her off fixed the spring tested it by pushing it with my finger( should spring closed after you open it, and slapped it on there and havent had a problem with it yet.
 

RBonite

New Member
Jun 8, 2006
9
0
2
Vallejo, CA
Aug 24, 2007
#7
  • Aug 24, 2007
  • #7
I've had the BBK TB for some time now and never had an issue. Power was not much (no dyno #s, just pedal feel) but I figure with future internal engine mods, it couldn't hurt to have it. Brenspeed got 7 rwhp with their modded S197. I'm glad I didn't spend the extra money for the GMS model.
 
S

Stang457

New Member
May 3, 2001
27
0
0
Long Island NY
Aug 24, 2007
#8
  • Aug 24, 2007
  • #8
Yea, the first time I had problems it was because it was not wound up enough. After that I fixed that problem and things kept happening. If it actually got 10hp I might mess with it more. 3 times on the side of the hwy in my suit winding a spring was enough for me.

lightblade said:
when i first installed it i pushed the throttle open with my finger and it got stuck or stayed open, i tooked it back a part and found that i clocked the spring wrong, pulled her off fixed the spring tested it by pushing it with my finger( should spring closed after you open it, and slapped it on there and havent had a problem with it yet.
Click to expand...
 

Fourth Horseman

New Member
Dec 1, 2004
92
0
0
Aug 24, 2007
#9
  • Aug 24, 2007
  • #9
I haven't changed out my Mustang's throttle body, but I know that when I put the dual 60mm Accufab throttle body on my Marauder that I had to adjust the throttle position sensor and use a volt meter to get the idle voltage just right. It wasn't hard to do, but was necessary so that the computer didn't freak out. Perhaps that's something that needs to be done on our Mustangs' TBs as well? Typically you can just loosen the two TPS screws and rotate the sensor ever so slightly one way or the other for adjustment.
 
M

MikeysOTP

New Member
Mar 29, 2007
203
1
0
Aug 24, 2007
#10
  • Aug 24, 2007
  • #10
I have a Dodge Dakota with the 4.7 in it and it is also drive by wire. The first thing I did to it when I got it was to follow a procedure posted on a message board like this one to adjust the TPS sensor to .07 volts. It made a huge difference in throttle response, apparently the factory does not have tight quality control over this setting. Is it possible that the problems people are having with these TB swaps are just adjustment issues with the TPS?
 
M

Mighty Mineral

New Member
Aug 6, 2007
15
0
0
So Cal
Aug 24, 2007
#11
  • Aug 24, 2007
  • #11
I run the MMR throttle body and have never had a problem with it sticking or causing error codes to trip the check engine lights. I did have the car tuned on a dyno immediately after installation. It is wierd to see so many problems with AM throttle bodies.
 
S

Stang457

New Member
May 3, 2001
27
0
0
Long Island NY
Aug 24, 2007
#12
  • Aug 24, 2007
  • #12
What kind of hp are you running with those mods? Are your happy with your cams?

Mighty Mineral said:
I run the MMR throttle body and have never had a problem with it sticking or causing error codes to trip the check engine lights. I did have the car tuned on a dyno immediately after installation. It is wierd to see so many problems with AM throttle bodies.
Click to expand...
 
M

Mighty Mineral

New Member
Aug 6, 2007
15
0
0
So Cal
Aug 24, 2007
#13
  • Aug 24, 2007
  • #13
Stang457 said:
What kind of hp are you running with those mods? Are your happy with your cams?
Click to expand...

Well I dont want to get flamed too badly so I will just post the dyno charts and spec sheets listing all the variables this weekend. I will only say it was low 4's to the rear wheels on a 91 tune. I had an appointment Thursday but the shop could not follow through..double booking. This next pull I am going to go aggressive on the tuning to see how much she will put to the wheels as I know she has got a lot more in there.

The cams were a challenge as they are more friendly to force fed motors. After the tuning was worked out they made this motor really rev and expanded my power range. I did the cams and heads at the same time which is why the tuning may have been a bit of a prob. The car idles nice and rumbly, they are kind of a give away though as it does not sound OE.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Starters suck. So does the aftermarket!
  • Blue Thunder
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
4K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 13, 2024
Blue Thunder
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Today at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
962
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?